This came up in bug 572348. Question, especially to maintainers of eselect modules, is it safe to globally set "umask +rx" in eselect, or are there any circumstances where files should be created with more restrictive permissions when root's umask asks for it?
Of course, it would still be possible to set a more restrictive umask or set permissions explicitly with chmod when this is needed in any module. Ulrich
pgppq8I20Q6kG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
