On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> IMO the best way will be to put mandatory stuff in the
> repo/gentoo.git.
On Thursday 13 August 2015 07:02:59 Rich Freeman wrote:
> Tend to agree. The main reason not to would be if they were
> maintained by different groups and we wante
This script needs a completely rewrite for Git,
previously parsed the CVS history file.
Volunteers welcome, please file a bug to infra with it.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:05:20AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
> from the tre
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2015-08-16 23:59 UTC.
Removals:
Additions:
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer
E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
Remove
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>
> Ebuild:
> - User copies .ebuild with expanded $Id$ to /usr/local/portage/...
> - User modifies local ebuild copy
> - User submits changed ebuild to bugzilla
> - Developer uses Header/Id to figure out what to base a diff on for
> mergin
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:33:05PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 02:44:47PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
> > Hi and happy Git days! :)
> >
> >
> > Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > It expands to the hash of the blob of that file; and from that, you can
> > > identify which commit
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 02:44:47PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Hi and happy Git days! :)
>
>
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > It expands to the hash of the blob of that file; and from that, you can
> > identify which commits the blob exists in.
>
> $ git ls-tree HEAD README
> 100644 blob 08ae16956b
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 09:52:06 -0700
Raymond Jennings wrote:
> What's the best way to get rid of deprecated ebuilds?
>
> Do we just wait for their maintainers to migrate them or should they
> be sought out and flagged? I'm pondering searching for EAPI 0
> ebuilds and filing bug reports on them.
What's the best way to get rid of deprecated ebuilds?
Do we just wait for their maintainers to migrate them or should they be
sought out and flagged? I'm pondering searching for EAPI 0 ebuilds and
filing bug reports on them.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 9:47 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
wrote:
> On 8/16/15 3:29 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> They are deprecated already:
>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/metadata/layout.conf
>>
>> Deprecated means stop adding them, and move away from them. Repoman
>> will give you a
On 8/16/15 3:29 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> They are deprecated already:
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/metadata/layout.conf
>
> Deprecated means stop adding them, and move away from them. Repoman
> will give you a warning about them.
Is anything blocking deprecating EAPI4 in the
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Raymond Jennings wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>
>> Finally, the gentoo developer quiz -should- still contain questions
>> about ancient stuff. There are still EAPI0 and EAPI2 ebuilds in the
>> tree at least.
>
>
> Why not de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 08/16/15 um 10:43 schrieb Joakim Tjernlund:
> vanilla-sources 3.14.x is gone from the tree.
>
> Jocke
>
Thanks. This is fixed in git now. There was a missing file name suffix
".ebuild".
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=65a
Also saw the wrong URL and sent a pull request to fix that earlier
today:
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo-portage-rsync-mirror/pull/195
--
Hanno Böck
http://hboeck.de/
mail/jabber: ha...@hboeck.de
GPG: BBB51E42
Hi everyone,
after I stopped getting updates when syncing I went to see the repo:
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo-portage-rsync-mirror
The link in '3. GitHub mirror with pre-generated metadata cache' is
broken, it points to:
https://github.com/gentoo-mirrors/gentoo
but should point to:
https://g
vanilla-sources 3.14.x is gone from the tree.
Jocke
15 matches
Mail list logo
