Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-03 Thread mingdao
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 03:11:30PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > > I would like to add a virtual/network-manager package to @system which > has the following rdepend settings: > > RDEPEND=" || ( > net-misc/netifrc > >=sys-apps/openrc-0.12[newnet] > net-misc/badvpn > net-mi

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-03 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
On 2013-12-03, at 6:00 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:43:28PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> On 2013-12-03, at 4:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >>> I would like to add a virtual/network-manager package to @system which >>> has the following rdepend settings: >>> >>> RDE

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-03 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:43:28PM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 2013-12-03, at 4:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > I would like to add a virtual/network-manager package to @system which > > has the following rdepend settings: > > > > RDEPEND=" || ( > >net-misc/netifrc > >>=sys-apps/o

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-03 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
On 2013-12-03, at 4:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 09:32:10PM +0400, Alexander V Vershilov wrote: >> On Dec 3, 2013 1:24 AM, "Ian Stakenvicius" wrote: >>> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> On 02/12/13 04:19 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wro

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-03 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 09:32:10PM +0400, Alexander V Vershilov wrote: > On Dec 3, 2013 1:24 AM, "Ian Stakenvicius" wrote: > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On 02/12/13 04:19 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > > > On 12/02/2013 03:28 PM, William Hubbs wrote: [.

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-03 Thread Alexander V Vershilov
On Dec 3, 2013 1:24 AM, "Ian Stakenvicius" wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 02/12/13 04:19 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > > On 12/02/2013 03:28 PM, William Hubbs wrote: [...] > >> Also, the other message in this thread is correct; the netifrc > >> use flag