El lun, 14-10-2013 a las 09:58 +0400, Peter Volkov escribió:
> В Вс, 13/10/2013 в 14:13 -0700, Matt Turner пишет:
> > On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:32 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > from what I'm seeing, we should look into converting /etc/mtab to a
> > > symlink to /proc/self/mounts [1].
>
> > Is t
В Вс, 13/10/2013 в 14:32 -0500, William Hubbs пишет:
> from what I'm seeing, we should look into converting /etc/mtab to a
> symlink to /proc/self/mounts [1].
>
> Are there any remaining concerns about doing this?
The only concern I have how this change affects *BSD or prefix? But yet
I failed to
В Вс, 13/10/2013 в 14:13 -0700, Matt Turner пишет:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:32 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > from what I'm seeing, we should look into converting /etc/mtab to a
> > symlink to /proc/self/mounts [1].
> Is the issue with NFS user mounts resolved? (Mentioned
> https://wiki.gentoo.
AFAIK this known historical behavior that what you find in
`/etc/mtab` are things mounted by mount(8) (if that's what's printed by
running just mount).
Whereas /proc/mounts is the kernel view on what's mounted.
Curiously I don't see any difference on my gentoo box, which I think I
should see but
I nolonger have Apple MacBook machine, so that I can't check if it's
working fine or not on any machine. Please pick it up.
app-laptop/pommed
pgpxEqTO_QCBY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 07:38:19AM +0800, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 10/14/2013 07:29 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> >> On 10/14/2013 03:32 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >>> All,
> >>>
> >>> from what I'm seeing, we should look into converting /etc/
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 07:21:47AM +0800, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 10/14/2013 03:32 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > from what I'm seeing, we should look into converting /etc/mtab to a
> > symlink to /proc/self/mounts [1].
> >
> > Are there any remaining concerns about doing this?
>
>
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2013-10-13 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
net-irc/ezbounce2013-10-12 12:01:50 pacho
app-misc/gpsdrive 2013-10-12 12:02:26 pacho
sys-
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:32 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> from what I'm seeing, we should look into converting /etc/mtab to a
>> symlink to /proc/self/mounts [1].
>>
>> Are there any remaining concerns about doing this?
>>
>> If not
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 10/14/2013 07:29 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>>> On 10/14/2013 03:32 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
from what I'm seeing, we should look into converting /etc/mtab to a
>>>
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> And the magic trick is to keep "system mounts" like /run out of
> /etc/mtab (willful desynchronization) so that umount -a doesn't nuke
> them by accident.
>
> ... why else would you keep such data in two non-synchronized locations?! :D
>
Sou
On 10/14/2013 07:29 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> On 10/14/2013 03:32 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> from what I'm seeing, we should look into converting /etc/mtab to a
>>> symlink to /proc/self/mounts [1].
>>>
>>> Are there any remai
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 10/14/2013 03:32 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> from what I'm seeing, we should look into converting /etc/mtab to a
>> symlink to /proc/self/mounts [1].
>>
>> Are there any remaining concerns about doing this?
>
> Apart from breaki
On 10/14/2013 03:32 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> from what I'm seeing, we should look into converting /etc/mtab to a
> symlink to /proc/self/mounts [1].
>
> Are there any remaining concerns about doing this?
Apart from breaking umount -a and some other things?
None at all ;)
(The breakag
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:32 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> from what I'm seeing, we should look into converting /etc/mtab to a
> symlink to /proc/self/mounts [1].
>
> Are there any remaining concerns about doing this?
>
> If not, it seems like it would be pretty easy to make baselayout crea
All,
from what I'm seeing, we should look into converting /etc/mtab to a
symlink to /proc/self/mounts [1].
Are there any remaining concerns about doing this?
If not, it seems like it would be pretty easy to make baselayout create
this symlink in the stages (I'm willing to do this work), but what
Am Samstag, 12. Oktober 2013, 08:45:15 schrieb Pacho Ramos:
> Due pebenito retirement:
> dev-libs/ustr
I've never heard of that package before, but the description sounded
interesting. So I went to their site and read what it is about, and it looks
like a project that seems to be ideal for my wo
17 matches
Mail list logo
