On 06/20/2013 05:27 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 06/19/2013 08:25 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 06/19/2013 07:59 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>>> I was surprised by repoman just dropping FEATURES="sign" . I'm aware
>>> that at that time it has to commit an updated Manifest to prevent
>>> breakages, s
Does this mean the QA lead finally gets to suspend people who are patently
not suited for developing a stable distribution without asking devrel?
Because last time we got into the same judge, jury, and executioner
argument, which I guess was just sent for the gallows (pun intended).
Mind, it's not
On 06/19/2013 08:25 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 06/19/2013 07:59 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> I was surprised by repoman just dropping FEATURES="sign" . I'm aware
>> that at that time it has to commit an updated Manifest to prevent
>> breakages, so if gpg fails it proceeds, but is there somethi
On 06/19/2013 07:59 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> I was surprised by repoman just dropping FEATURES="sign" . I'm aware
> that at that time it has to commit an updated Manifest to prevent
> breakages, so if gpg fails it proceeds, but is there something it could
> do to check gpg sanity before com
Today an interesting thing happened to my repoman, as I was committing a
change:
>>> Creating Manifest for /home/ph/gentoo-x86/dev-lang/v8
gpg: no default secret key: Unusable secret key
gpg: /home/ph/gentoo-x86/dev-lang/v8/Manifest: clearsign failed:
Unusable secret key
!!! !!! gpg exited with '2
On 06/19/2013 09:15 PM, g...@malth.us wrote:
> Sorry to hear you have such a low opinion of the socialization of Gentoo
> developers. Since I'm not one of them, I'll just put forth my 2c in on
> this, without fear of "consequences."
Yet even users not behaving will get a friendly warning and migh
On Monday 17 June 2013 16:37:06 Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> On 06/17/2013 04:19 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> > On 17/06/2013 17:54, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> >> I make all my files with "tar cJf"
> >>
> >> zero@ozzie ~ % file /usr/portage/distfiles/gr-osmosdr-0.0.2.tar.xz
> >> /us
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:15 PM, wrote:
> Am I the only one who feels that trolling, abuse, and so forth, are largely
> in the eye of the beholder, and that lively, impassioned, constructive
> debate may seem to many readers like hyperbole and ad hominem attack?
Hence my comment that this is a b
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 03:43:41PM -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> Gentoo developers have been resigning from the project because they got
> burned out by dealing with ad-hominems, insults, and flames. I do not see CoC
> enforcement as some sort of plot to enforce groupthink or silence debat
Gentoo developers have been resigning from the project because they got burned
out by dealing with ad-hominems, insults, and flames. I do not see CoC
enforcement as some sort of plot to enforce groupthink or silence debate, but
as an attempt to fix the real problem of burnout and talent drain.
on Wed, 19 Jun 2013, at 10:35, Markos Chandras thusly quipped:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi,
>
> It is unfortunate to observe constant bullying, insults and trolling
> across our public media. Developers have been warned over and over that
> such behaviour is not acc
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 06:35:49PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
> For me, this problem is critical. Devrel is working on formalizing a new
> policy, and we will announce news on this soon. In the meantime, to
> prevent further escalations, I will use my lead powers to request
> immediate bans whe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
It is unfortunate to observe constant bullying, insults and trolling
across our public media. Developers have been warned over and over that
such behaviour is not acceptable and they should try to behave
properly. However, people have ignored su
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Michael Weber wrote:
> On 06/19/2013 02:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Dnia 2013-06-19, o godz. 14:09:26
>> Michael Weber napisał(a):
>>
>>> - multilib builds and rename non-DEFAULT_ABI $bins to $bin.${ABI}
>>
>> And why exactly do you need multilib for a web brows
Michael Weber schrieb:
> On 06/19/2013 02:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Dnia 2013-06-19, o godz. 14:09:26
>> Michael Weber napisał(a):
>>
>>> - multilib builds and rename non-DEFAULT_ABI $bins to $bin.${ABI}
>>
>> And why exactly do you need multilib for a web browser?
>>
>
> No need for the brow
On 06/19/2013 02:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2013-06-19, o godz. 14:09:26
> Michael Weber napisał(a):
>
>> - multilib builds and rename non-DEFAULT_ABI $bins to $bin.${ABI}
>
> And why exactly do you need multilib for a web browser?
>
No need for the browser package (just fun) but I'd li
Dnia 2013-06-19, o godz. 14:09:26
Michael Weber napisał(a):
> - multilib builds and rename non-DEFAULT_ABI $bins to $bin.${ABI}
And why exactly do you need multilib for a web browser?
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
I'd like to add a new eclass for www-client/netsurf related ebuilds and
seek your review and approval. I'll add it in two days, if unchallenged.
=== Motivation ===
The browser projects started out as a stray set of components [1], some
without releases.
In the meantime, all stuff is pres
18 matches
Mail list logo
