The issue is basically, as you'll see in my comments on the updated
bug, Perl virtuals are not very trivial, and every perl release
results in a nightmare of fixes we have to apply to every Perl virtual
in tree, so we don't , at present, want more virtuals than necessary.
I'd personally love to ha
On 11 November 2012 00:27, aranea wrote:
>>
>
> It's been 3 months since I filed this bug, and one month ago I sent a
> reminder to the gentoo-perl ML. There haven't been any reactions. I
> also couldn't reach anyone on IRC. Is this herd dead or what?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warnock%27s_Dil
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012 15:07:45 +0200
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> could somebody please have a look at this bug:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429378
>
> There are some other virtuals which have a similar problem, I just
> want one precedent before filing bugs for all of them...
>
> Regards
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 14:40:19 -0800
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:31:07PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Brian Harring
> > wrote:
> > > Either way, I'm honestly not trying to piss folks off here nor
> > > stop the efforts to dig us out of the p
