Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: fortran-2.eclass to depend on virtual/fortran

2012-10-09 Thread Justin
On 09.10.2012 23:19, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 07 October 2012 13:58:04 justin wrote: >> On 10/7/12 7:36 PM, Jonathan Callen wrote: >>> You cannot check the value of IUSE in global scope in an eclass, as at >>> least portage actually unsets it before sourcing an eclass (also, it >>> is not

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages which won't support x32

2012-10-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 06 October 2012 21:05:14 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > It's also interesting to note that > Werner Koch of libgcrypt and gnupg fame is also not interested in > supporting x32. i'd say not terribly relevant considering he also finds pkg-config to be pointless new technology -mike signa

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages which won't support x32

2012-10-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 05 October 2012 10:28:45 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: > This is the case with dev-lang/v8: it doesn't build on x32 > (), and upstream said they *won't* > support x32 > (). i think you misread.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH/RFC] eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass: prepend-ldpath

2012-10-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 06 October 2012 03:47:57 Gregory M. Turner wrote: > My god, I am a horrible self-editor. Sorry. Please ignore the magnum > opus above and allow me to try again. > > In dev-lang/python*, we use > >append-ldflags '-L.' > > to ensure linking is performed against the built libpytho

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: fortran-2.eclass to depend on virtual/fortran

2012-10-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 07 October 2012 13:58:04 justin wrote: > On 10/7/12 7:36 PM, Jonathan Callen wrote: > > You cannot check the value of IUSE in global scope in an eclass, as at > > least portage actually unsets it before sourcing an eclass (also, it > > is not defined in PMS what value IUSE would have at t

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: fortran-2.eclass to depend on virtual/fortran

2012-10-09 Thread justin
On 09/10/12 15:12, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 07/10/12 02:56 PM, justin wrote: >> On 10/7/12 8:19 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: >>> justin schrieb: Hi, I want to add following change to fortran-2.eclass to achieve more simpler usage. The patch will make the

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: fortran-2.eclass to depend on virtual/fortran

2012-10-09 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/10/12 02:56 PM, justin wrote: > On 10/7/12 8:19 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: >> justin schrieb: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I want to add following change to fortran-2.eclass to achieve >>> more simpler usage. >>> >>> The patch will make the e