On 12/4/11 9:35 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> Within the Gentoo Hardened project, we are working on getting the SELinux
> support into shape. Recent evolutions are the stabilization of latest upstream
> userspace utilities and policies as well as documentation improvements and
> even
> some "human r
Rich Freeman posted on Sun, 04 Dec 2011 22:10:19 -0500 as excerpted:
> My sense is that none of the PMS versions really say quite what we want
> the behavior to be - as to be truly compliant ebuilds would have to
> require nothing outside of the base system in the pkg phases (other than
> pkg_conf
Hello,
For a while sources.gentoo.org has been puttering along and its health
has slowly declined. We migrated it to some newer shiny hardware in an
attempt to mitigate the problem but that did not pan out. 90% (or
more) of sources.gentoo.org traffic is crawler bots and not actual
humans. That bei
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> I haven't really understood what you mean with RDEPENDs being scheduled
> "after".
> RDEPEND must be always scheduled before the pkg requiring it, changing
> this behaviour would have disruptive effects on all the PMS out there
There is on
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 11:10:17PM +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> > [...]
> > The dependency must be on both levels, because the SELinux module must be
> > installed before the package is installed (and in theory, RDEPEND could
> > trigger a
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2011-12-04 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-scheme/plt-scheme 2011-11-28 18:33:44 ssuominen
dev-java/netx 2011-11-28 19:13:19 fordfrog
dev-java/jnlp
On Sunday 04 December 2011 15:35:50 Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> Since there are quite a few packages that would need updates, I thought
> about first mailing gentoo-dev for feedback and perhaps a first chunk of
> work done. I also wouldn't mind creating bugreports for each of them, but
> that would sti
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> [...]
> The dependency must be on both levels, because the SELinux module must be
> installed before the package is installed (and in theory, RDEPEND could
> trigger an installation afterwards): during the installation phase, Portage
> labels
On Sunday, December 4, 2011 4:50:02 PM UTC+2, Leho Kraav wrote:
>
> * fork my own user.eclass from v1.17, modify it to use --root $ROOT when
> calling shadow stuff
So first thing I'm running into is replacing getent with something that
supports chrooting. Only immediate thought for users is usi
On 04.12.2011 22:35, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> Hi guys 'n gals
>
> obligatory tl;dr:
> Please check your package below this list and see if it (the package) has
> a proper DEPEND and RDEPEND on the listed sec-policy/selinux-
> package(s)
>
The list would be easier to read if it was sorted. Al
Hi guys 'n gals
obligatory tl;dr:
Please check your package below this list and see if it (the package) has
a proper DEPEND and RDEPEND on the listed sec-policy/selinux-
package(s)
Within the Gentoo Hardened project, we are working on getting the SELinux
support into shape. Recent evolutions
On 12/4/11 8:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> since hardened doen't support on
> dropping the custom code we have to support this. it allows me to simplify
> the common code a bit.
Simplifying toolchain.eclass sounds great to me. :)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ssp used to be out-of-tree custom code that Gentoo added to older versions of
gcc. eventually, mainline gcc pick it up.
since hardened doen't support
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sunday 04 December 2011 12:37:15 James Cloos wrote:
> As someone who leaves root w/o LANG, I would note that there are a few
> packages which cannot build unless LANG is set to a UTF-8 locale.
file a bug then
> What we really need is C.UTF-8 and/or POSIX.UTF-8, and to force *that*
> in emerge(
As someone who leaves root w/o LANG, I would note that there are a few
packages which cannot build unless LANG is set to a UTF-8 locale.
What we really need is C.UTF-8 and/or POSIX.UTF-8, and to force *that*
in emerge(1), ebuild(1), etc.
-JimC
--
James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
On 12/04/2011 06:44 AM, Leho Kraav wrote:
> So after a reading through a bunch of stuff [1][2][3][4][5], what I'm going
> to do for the goal above is:
>
> * move to sys-apps/shadow trunk [6]
> * fork my own user.eclass from v1.17, modify it to use --root $ROOT when
> calling shadow stuff
> *
Hi everyone,
we're about to stabilize KDEPIM-4.7 for the first time (last stable KDEPIM
suite is 4.4.11.1). Below is a news item for that, which I'd like to get out
in 48hours as long as there are no major problems.
The news item can also be found (in possibly updated form) at
http://dev.gen
On 12/04/2011 09:44 AM, Leho Kraav wrote:
> So after a reading through a bunch of stuff [1][2][3][4][5], what I'm going
> to do for the goal above is:
>
> * move to sys-apps/shadow trunk [6]
> * fork my own user.eclass from v1.17, modify it to use --root $ROOT when
> calling shadow stuff
I th
So after a reading through a bunch of stuff [1][2][3][4][5], what I'm going to
do for the goal above is:
* move to sys-apps/shadow trunk [6]
* fork my own user.eclass from v1.17, modify it to use --root $ROOT when
calling shadow stuff
* stick my user.eclass into myoverlay/eclass/
* # echo "l
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:09:03 +
James Broadhead wrote:
> On 4 December 2011 06:51, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 04:50:00 +0100
> > Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> >
> >> Subject says it all. More and more bug attachments appear that have
> >> been generated with non-English locales, and it
On 4 December 2011 06:51, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 04:50:00 +0100
> Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
>> Subject says it all. More and more bug attachments appear that have
>> been generated with non-English locales, and it's a nuisance for both
>> bug reporters and bug wranglers to request/pr
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 12:58:06 +0100
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> I too think it is sufficient to have
> LC_MESSAGES=C
> in the default make.conf (or somewhere else where the user can easily
> change it), with a comment to leave it like this for build.log when
> reporting bugs.
Now that I
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
> Can we just translate the error messages?
>
That seems pretty impractical to me. Google Translate is about your
only option here, and somehow I doubt it is up to parsing build logs.
Hand translation could work if we increases the understaffed
On 12/4/11 12:58 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Mike Frysinger schrieb:
>> and in reality, you're complaining only about LC_MESSAGES, not LC_ALL or any
>> other locale category ...
>
> I too think it is sufficient to have
> LC_MESSAGES=C
> in the default make.conf (or somewhere else wh
2011/12/4 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn :
> I too think it is sufficient to have
> LC_MESSAGES=C
> in the default make.conf (or somewhere else where the user can easily
> change it), with a comment to leave it like this for build.log when
> reporting bugs.
++
Or if that goes too far have it commen
Mike Frysinger schrieb:
> and in reality, you're complaining only about LC_MESSAGES, not LC_ALL or any
> other locale category ...
I too think it is sufficient to have
LC_MESSAGES=C
in the default make.conf (or somewhere else where the user can easily
change it), with a comment to leave it like t
I released eucsan-0.1.0 last week and hwoarang uploaded the associated
ebuild. You can now emerge it instead of euscan-.
Note that this is only the standalone utility, not the web interface.
I you have an overlay, you can run "eix --in-overlay
--only-names | xargs euscan" to scan only your p
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 04:50:00 +0100
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Subject says it all. More and more bug attachments appear that have
> been generated with non-English locales, and it's a nuisance for both
> bug reporters and bug wranglers to request/provide the sane
> alternative that every developer sh
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 07:51:09 +0100
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 00:51:17 -0600
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>
> > How many times have you needed to request build logs in english since
> > the last time you brought this up? How many times have you had to
> > request emerge --info or build lo
29 matches
Mail list logo
