Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] toolchain-funcs.eclass: functions to call compiler

On Wednesday, June 09, 2010 01:34:27 Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:44:55 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Sunday, June 06, 2010 03:45:51 Michał Górny wrote: > > i dont know anything about zpaq, but it looks like you're installing > > the bare .o files ? that's a bit odd. usually t

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] toolchain-funcs.eclass: functions to call compiler

On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:44:55 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday, June 06, 2010 03:45:51 Michał Górny wrote: > > Well, I've already covered one corner case myself, which is the zpaq > > ebuild. I would approve a comment on my idea here: > > > > http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise/changese

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Council 2010/2011 - Nominations are now open

On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 10:47:54 +0400 Peter Volkov wrote: > В Сбт, 05/06/2010 в 02:00 +0200, Torsten Veller пишет: > > Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2010/2011 are now open for the next > > two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 18/06/2010). > > > > All nominations must be sent to the gentoo-dev mailing l

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] toolchain-funcs.eclass: functions to call compiler

On Sunday, June 06, 2010 03:45:51 Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 00:17:27 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i'm not saying `emake` covers all solutions you proposed, just that > > the base usage isnt nearly as bleak. there are some cases where > > having a wrapper around emake would be use

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-p2p/Circle

# Stanislav Ochotnicky (08 Jun 2010) # # Ebuild failing after recent python changes. Needs changes, dead # upstream and there are plenty of alternatives. # # Masked for removal in 30 days (bz323269) net-p2p/Circle -- Stanislav Ochotnicky jabber: sochotni...@gmail.com PGP: 0x71A1677C signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-editors/vim and USE="vim-with-x" -> Rename to USE="X"?

On Monday, June 07, 2010 14:44:32 Jim Ramsay wrote: > There is an ancient bug[1] dealing with the "vim-with-x" USE flag. > > I think it makes sense to rename this flag from 'vim-with-x' to just > 'X', but thought I'd raise the issue here since this USE flag has been > around since before time bega

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb

On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 06:25:17PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:14:07 +0200 > José María Alonso wrote: > > > I would be very pleased to maintain this package: > > > > > app-doc/repodoc > > > Is there any chance I can maintain this package?. What do > > I have to do?. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-editors/vim and USE="vim-with-x" -> Rename to USE="X"?

On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:53:22 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:44:32 -0400 > Jim Ramsay wrote: > > There is an ancient bug[1] dealing with the "vim-with-x" USE flag. > > > > I think it makes sense to rename this flag from 'vim-with-x' to just > > 'X', but thought I'd raise the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb

On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:14:07 +0200 José María Alonso wrote: > I would be very pleased to maintain this package: > > > app-doc/repodoc > Is there any chance I can maintain this package?. What do > I have to do?. You could provide unified patches to the ebuilds to fix the four outstanding bugs[1

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Packages up for grabs -- xmerlin, yoswink, chtekk, omp, tantive, mueli, bluebird, hncaldwell, caleb

On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 09:18:50AM +0200, Torsten Veller wrote: > Here's a bunch of packages up for grabs, due to maintainers retiring.. > > maintainer-needed > - > app-admin/ec2-ami-tools > app-admin/ec2-api-tools > app-admin/gentoo-rsync-mirror > app-admin/monit > app-admin/rackv