On Wednesday, June 09, 2010 01:34:27 Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:44:55 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Sunday, June 06, 2010 03:45:51 Michał Górny wrote: > > i dont know anything about zpaq, but it looks like you're installing > > the bare .o files ? that's a bit odd. usually things like this are > > installed as static archives for people to link in ... > > A single .o file exactly. ZPAQ in runtime can 'optimize' itself through > creating compression scheme sources and calling 'zpaqmake' to compile > it. > > The default 'zpaqmake.bat' included with it compiled these schemes > along with 'zpaq.cpp' for the executable stub. I've decided that it'd > be better to provide already compiled stub.
if it's all internal to zpaq itself (i.e. packages arent externally pulling in the files w/out help), then the .o's are fine. > Honestly, I didn't think long about the format. I guess .a could be > better, or maybe even a shared library -- but GNU make doesn't seem to > have implicit rules for these formats. there are implicit rules for generating archives, but iirc, they dont work in parallel. shared libs obviously dont exist because this is highly target specific -- this is why libtool exists in the first place. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
