On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Caleb Cushing wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Aaron Lebahn wrote:
>> The difference would be that that proposition is web-based. I propose either
>> a locally built or pre-built installer.
>
> and the advantage over say... stage4's?
>
Incidentally, I wa
Am Mittwoch, den 25.03.2009, 23:23 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:06:37 +0100
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > 9) EAPI 3 bans || ( use? ( ... ) )
> >
> > What is the suggested replacement? If there's a decent one, sure.
>
> The replacement is to write the deps out correctl
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:18:52 +0100
[snip]
> 12) EAPI 3 supports .xz, .tar.xz
[snip]
Could we have EAPI 3 also support extracting .xpi files? Right now
ebuilds use xpi_unpack() from mozextension.eclass which is ugly as
hell. It seems it sho
Am Mittwoch, den 25.03.2009, 23:26 + schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:08:37 +0100
> Tiziano Müller wrote:
> > > 8) EAPI 3 requires doins support for symlinks
> >
> > Current behaviour is to copy the file the symlink points to, right?
>
> No, current behaviour is undefined for
On Monday 23 March 2009 13:01:46 Alec Warner wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Now that "dosed" is going to be banned, what would people think of
> >>> "newins" (and the other "new*" commands) accepting
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:08:37 +0100
Tiziano Müller wrote:
> > 8) EAPI 3 requires doins support for symlinks
>
> Current behaviour is to copy the file the symlink points to, right?
No, current behaviour is undefined for not a file.
> > 14) EAPI 3 supports pkg_info on installed packages
> you proba
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:06:37 +0100
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > 9) EAPI 3 bans || ( use? ( ... ) )
>
> What is the suggested replacement? If there's a decent one, sure.
The replacement is to write the deps out correctly. Every single use of
|| ( use? ( ... ) ) in the tree is wrong.
> > 2) EAPI 3
Hi,
it is time for me to anounce the meeting for April.
This month topics are:
- unprefixing misc stuff
- moving plasmoids to the tree
- kde3 state
- moving printing to the tree
- upstream responses on packaging snapshots
- removing dead members
- pykde fixing
- handling kdeprefix for base... esele
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Aaron Lebahn wrote:
> The difference would be that that proposition is web-based. I propose either
> a locally built or pre-built installer.
and the advantage over say... stage4's?
--
Caleb Cushing
http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
On 20:38 Sun 22 Mar , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> 1) EAPI 3 has pkg_pretend.
> 3) EAPI 3 has use dependency defaults
> 5) EAPI 3 has a default src_install
> 15) USE is stricter in EAPI 3
> 19) RDEPEND=DEPEND gone in EAPI 3
> 22) EAPI 3 has nonfatal, utilities die
Very Yes. I would really like to
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:22:47PM -0600, Aaron Lebahn wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:57:56PM -0600, Aaron Lebahn wrote:
> > > Could you please provide a link to a location where I may find this stage
> > > builder proposition?
> >
The basic idea is to be able to easily use overlays (without layman).
I believe this to be a pre-req to the "Cache Sync" idea listed on the
wiki.
each repo should be able to have a differently defined way of sync-ing
(within predefined standards), I think they should also be capable of
defining th
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:57:56PM -0600, Aaron Lebahn wrote:
> > Could you please provide a link to a location where I may find this stage
> > builder proposition?
>
> http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/2009_Summer_Of_Code_Ideas#Create_a_Web
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:57:56PM -0600, Aaron Lebahn wrote:
> Could you please provide a link to a location where I may find this stage
> builder proposition?
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/2009_Summer_Of_Code_Ideas#Create_a_Web-based_Gentoo_image_builder
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Deve
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> In a similar strain, I'd suggest looking at the stage-builder SoC
> proposal by solar. The EeePC would probably be just throwing a tarball
> of configuration files over the top of it.
>
> --
> Robin Hugh Johnson
> Gentoo Linux Developer
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:42:28AM -0600, Aaron Lebahn wrote:
> Hello, I would like to apply as a student in the Google Summer of Code
> program. I would like to work on creating a simple method to install Gentoo
> on an EeePC. This will involve creating scripts and code that will
> preconfigure th
Aaron Lebahn wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Andrey Falko wrote:
>
>
>> Would it be possible to integrate these scripts into Gentoo current
>> graphical installer, as well as included on one of the minimal install
>> CDs?
>>
>>
> Yes, That would be a good idea. I could add to the grap
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:06:47 +0100
> Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
>> Considering average post count and Gentoo membership on that list,
>> I'm pretty convinced you're not entitled to decide who is wasting
>> developers' time.
>
> When you've g
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:34:01 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Dne středa 25 Březen 2009 19:25:02 Peter Alfredsen napsal(a):
> I will just pick parts with notes. Some of them apply on more
> places :]
>
> > # @ECLASS-VARIABLE: HOMEPAGE
> > # @DESCRIPTION:
> > # HOMEPAGE is set to http://poppler.freed
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:06:47 +0100
Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> Considering average post count and Gentoo membership on that list,
> I'm pretty convinced you're not entitled to decide who is wasting
> developers' time.
When you've gained enough experience and knowledge to be able to
evaluate the mer
On Wednesday 25 of March 2009 15:19:36 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Being rude doesn't make you cool. (Nor make your points more
> > effective)
>
> That's not being rude.
[...]
(no comment)
> so you're doing them a
> discourtesy by wasting their time by repeatedly posting ideas you
> haven't though
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Andrey Falko wrote:
> Would it be possible to integrate these scripts into Gentoo current
> graphical installer, as well as included on one of the minimal install
> CDs?
>
>
Yes, That would be a good idea. I could add to the graphical install instead
of trying t
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Caleb Cushing wrote:
wouldn't one problem with this be that different EeePC's have
> different hardware? I believe, that your's has an atom processor while
> older models have a celeron.
>
This problem would add complexity which I would tackle. I would like to
e
Dne středa 25 Březen 2009 19:25:02 Peter Alfredsen napsal(a):
I will just pick parts with notes. Some of them apply on more places :]
> # @ECLASS-VARIABLE: HOMEPAGE
> # @DESCRIPTION:
> # HOMEPAGE is set to http://poppler.freedesktop.org
> HOMEPAGE="http://poppler.freedesktop.org/";
Why you describ
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Aaron Lebahn wrote:
> an EeePC. This will involve creating scripts and code that will preconfigure
> the Gentoo instalation to be optimized for the EeePC, and to contain all of
> the appropriate modules and configurations to enable all hardware on the
> EeePC.
> I
Hi,
This is an eclass that provides functionality needed to further split
poppler into its constituent libraries and utilities. The current way
of doing this, where we have poppler with utils in app-text/poppler and
the bindings for qt3, qt4 and glib in app-text/poppler-bindings is
suboptimal.
1)
Hello, I would like to apply as a student in the Google Summer of Code
program. I would like to work on creating a simple method to install Gentoo
on an EeePC. This will involve creating scripts and code that will
preconfigure the Gentoo instalation to be optimized for the EeePC, and to
contain all
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:19:12 +0100
Luca Barbato wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Uhm. Do you think these ideas of yours through at all before posting
> > them?
>
> Being rude doesn't make you cool. (Nor make your points more
> effective)
That's not being rude. It's an attempt to bring your at
On 21:18 Sun 22 Mar , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote
> on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev
> list to see.
Here's a very simple agenda. I'm at a conference this week, so I'm glad
there weren't a
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Uhm. Do you think these ideas of yours through at all before posting
them?
Being rude doesn't make you cool. (Nor make your points more effective)
Either you think the entire tree should be switched to a new EAPI in
one go, in which case how on earth is that going to ge
30 matches
Mail list logo
