Re: [gentoo-dev] Repository stacking and complementary overlays

2009-03-04 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zac Medico wrote: > Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: >> This seems desirable and reasonable. >> As I replied to this subject earlier regarding KDE, let me complement >> that information. In the case of the KDE team, we keep work on a release >> all in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repository stacking and complementary overlays

2009-03-04 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > This seems desirable and reasonable. > As I replied to this subject earlier regarding KDE, let me complement > that information. In the case of the KDE team, we keep work on a release > all in the same place, so we d

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA Overlay Layout support.

2009-03-04 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wulf C. Krueger wrote: > On Monday, 02. March 2009 10:29:59 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: >> Also, having separate overlays would allow one to do experimental stuff >> with eclasses in the experimental overlay without affecting users of the >> base

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repository stacking and complementary overlays

2009-03-04 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:41:23 +0200 > Mart Raudsepp wrote: >> So here the reverting of a masking in gentoo-x86 is quite intentional >> and currently desired. > > This is fundamentally broken as a concept. > > Adding an overla

Re: [gentoo-dev] Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support )

2009-03-04 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Caleb Cushing wrote: > I'd like to start with, I'm not trying to stir up trouble but since > questions were asked i'll answer them. > >> If you think neither should exist why do you have an opinion about this at >> all? > > I merged the java-overlay

Re: [gentoo-dev] Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support )

2009-03-04 Thread Caleb Cushing
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Thomas Anderson wrote: > eh, that's the problem with ~arch. ~amd64 keywords aren't added for > every new version; keywords are carried over from the previous version. > Having to test each new version of a package before it receiving a > keyword puts far too much st

Re: [gentoo-dev] Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support )

2009-03-04 Thread Caleb Cushing
> Bugzilla is a tool for developers to track progress, not for > third-party distributions to track progress. You've forked the tree. > That's fine. The license allows that. But it doesn't obligate us to > adapt our tools to fit your purpose. I've done lots of version bump bugs over the years. my

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git eclass update

2009-03-04 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne úterý 03 Březen 2009 20:47:28 Tomáš Chvátal napsal(a): > [2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/git.eclass.diff As for now the diff is really obsolete so use direct link and make diff yourself (sorry but i preffer fast including patches :]) Tomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitall

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git eclass update

2009-03-04 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne středa 04 Březen 2009 11:29:44 Rémi Cardona napsal(a): > Tomáš Chvátal a écrit : > > Hi, > > I am currently messing with git.eclass and i would like to see some other > > sets of eyes on it. > > I am throwing in full new eclass [1] and its diff [2]. > > I will be really happy for comments and e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git eclass update

2009-03-04 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne středa 04 Březen 2009 11:22:54 Rémi Cardona napsal(a): > Tomáš Chvátal a écrit : > > Hi, > > I am currently messing with git.eclass and i would like to see some other > > sets of eyes on it. > > I am throwing in full new eclass [1] and its diff [2]. > > I will be really happy for comments and e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support )

2009-03-04 Thread Thomas Anderson
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 02:32:13AM -0500, Caleb Cushing wrote: > > Further, overlays are good places to put ebuilds for software that is more > > experimental than what's expected for ~arch. That includes live ebuilds. In > > the > > end, overlays have a (far) lower level of guaranteed quality tha

[gentoo-dev] Re: How to speed up maintenance and other Gentoo work?

2009-03-04 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 04:01:36AM +0200, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > I'm collecting ideas from the wider development and contributing > community on how to help maintainers and contributors get work done > quicker, or rephrased - how to get more done in the limited time we > have. Give a git access

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git eclass update

2009-03-04 Thread Mike Auty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > I am throwing in full new eclass [1] and its diff [2]. Errr, maybe it's my eyes, but it looks as though the new eclass isn't the same as the existing eclass with the diff applied (for instance, git_src_prepare doesn't get called

Re: [gentoo-dev] Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support )

2009-03-04 Thread Peter Alfredsen
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 02:32:13 -0500 Caleb Cushing wrote: > I'd like to start with, I'm not trying to stir up trouble but since > questions were asked i'll answer them. > > > If you think neither should exist why do you have an opinion about > > this at all? > > I merged the java-overlay into rege

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git eclass update

2009-03-04 Thread Rémi Cardona
Tomáš Chvátal a écrit : Hi, I am currently messing with git.eclass and i would like to see some other sets of eyes on it. I am throwing in full new eclass [1] and its diff [2]. I will be really happy for comments and even more for diffs :D Oh and by the way, the diff looks nice to me. Maybe w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git eclass update

2009-03-04 Thread Rémi Cardona
Tomáš Chvátal a écrit : Hi, I am currently messing with git.eclass and i would like to see some other sets of eyes on it. I am throwing in full new eclass [1] and its diff [2]. I will be really happy for comments and even more for diffs :D Does/Can it fix bug #247187 ? Or is it something that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repository stacking and complementary overlays

2009-03-04 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 02 mars 2009 à 23:59 +, Ciaran McCreesh a écrit : > On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:55:38 +0100 > Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > We didn't implement anything but let's just talk about what we wanted > > to see. We simply wanted overlay users to keep testing gnome 2.24 > > components that wer