Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:29:56 -0400:
> Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Its a good idea, but since our users don't always provide useful
>> reports, it seems like we are just shifting work around.
>
> I'd suggest t
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Hi,
I'm really curious to know why a new (global) useflag couldn't
do the trick.
Read Mart's mail again, that's exactly what he's proposing.
And if no-one objects, I'll be working this inside the gnome2 eclass
(with review on this list before the final commit of cours
After a kernel update, sys-kernel/module-rebuild can be used to rebuild the
installed external kernel modules.
Software like dev-libs/klibc or app-cdr/cdrtools are linked against the kernel
sources and not against the kernel headers. Is it other programs like them in
the tree?
I am not a gentoo p
Albert Zeyer kirjoitti:
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 09:35 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 14:52 Thu 05 Jun , Samuli Suominen wrote:
# Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05 Jun 2008)
# Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners.
# Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, some of you might still remember what I said about gtk and
> slots long time ago. Just to summarize my point:
>
> * the use of slots should be MINIMIZED. IMHO, the kernel is one
> of the few valid uses, gtk is NOT
Hi,
I'm really curious to know why a new (global) useflag couldn't
do the trick.
Let's say, we introduce a new useflag called "static-libs" and
enable it by defaulin all profiles. Then we can have a look at
the lib packages step by step and add support when it seems
useful there and test out c
* Gilles Dartiguelongue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Le lundi 30 juin 2008 à 19:01 +0200, Enrico Weigelt a écrit :
> >
> >
> > Funny, how you all manage to make simple things complicated ;-o
> >
> > I guess nobody considered an trivial solutions like an useflag ...
>
> no, this is not the pro
Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its a good idea, but since our users don't
> always provide useful reports, it seems like we are just shifting work
> around.
I'd suggest that this would /spread/ work around - Instead of a few
folks wrangling bugs, everyone would be doing it.
That said, I
Here's the updated version of my proposition:
default/linux: LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"
default/linux/mips: LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1,--sort-common"
hardened/linux: LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"
uclibc: LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1,--sort-common"
--
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> So this is now the third revision of this proposal.
>
> The first two editions are available here.
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/48485
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/49601
>
> Comments are welcome, as are off
On T, 2008-07-01 at 11:33 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Duncan a écrit :
> > Probably others than GNOME, too.
>
> Thus Mart's effort to bring it to gentoo-dev :)
And for constructive discussing of it, including with releng and other
teams.
> > This is the ticklish bit, but there's still a way aro
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 05:30 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
> the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
> (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
>
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit :
Le lundi 30 juin 2008 à 13:33 -0700, Donnie Berkholz a écrit :
On 22:04 Mon 30 Jun , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
PS: I'd like to remind users reading here that assigning bugs directly
is _bad_ if you didn't perform the above checks. It is _not_ ok to
assign
Duncan a écrit :
Probably others than GNOME, too.
Thus Mart's effort to bring it to gentoo-dev :)
This is the ticklish bit, but there's still a way around it for users
(such as those trying to fit GNOME on a liveCD) that need it. Useing
portage's bashrc, setup a conditional that excepts pac
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
G
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 14:10 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:42:49 +0300
> Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> > > imo -Wl,-O1 should go into base
> > > -mike
> >
> > So seems like we should just do it (tm).
>
> Why not default/linux?
Just
Mart Raudsepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 01 Jul 2008
05:05:51 +0300:
> Over a year or two ago, it was communicated that it supposedly a policy
> that USE=static should only control if a package installs static
> libraries INSTEAD of shared libraries, an
On 19:33 Thu 05 Jun , Roy Bamford wrote:
> I don't want to nominate anyone who hasn't been nominated already.
> I would like to address all the candidates who have or will accept
> council nominations.
I just got to this because I was on vacation and I've been busy getting
work done since I
18 matches
Mail list logo
