В Чтв, 19/06/2008 в 21:03 +, Michael Sterrett (mr_bones_) пишет:
> mr_bones_08/06/19 21:03:29
>
> Modified: package.mask
> Log:
> mask =games-kids/gcompris-8.4.5 until
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=225883 is fixed up.
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.8740
Hi guys,
The voting part of the election has just started and will last for
next two weeks (until July 4th, 23:59 UTC).
In case you forgot, here are the rules:
All active Gentoo developers are eligible to vote. To do that, you
should login to dev.gentoo.org and run the following commands:
1
Hi folks,
why not just introducing an "staticlib" useflag:
when disabling this, all the static library stuff is kicked off.
For those libs where the static stuff is needed, just leave it
enabled. And packages which really depend on static libs could
check for the proper useflags.
cu
--
-
Samuli Suominen yazmış:
> Perhaps it should be a council agenda?
I think we can get it stable before the next council meeting ;)
--
Regards,
Ali Polatel
pgpNUct0SMpL2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Santiago M. Mola yazmış:
> There are a few things which need some kind of action before/during
> python 2.5 stabilization:
>
> Needs stabilization:
> * dev-python/python-bibtext-1.2.3
Already done. #194810
> * dev-python/pyvorbis-1.4-r3 (a bit buggy, debian has patches for 1.3,
> some of them can
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:10:56PM +, Ferris McCormick wrote:
> No, for two reasons. No one is named, and you can't libel anonymous.
A group of people is named though, but we're getting into discussions
about details here.
> Also if it's true, it's not libel.
Is it? Ciaran failed to provide
>
> How much _technical_ discussion have you seen on the list lately?
>
That's right, this thread belongs to gentoo-project or gentoo-flamewars or
gentoo-give-me-a-break mailing list ;)
--
Sergio D. Rodríguez Inclan
On 2008-06-20 07:25, George Prowse uttered these thoughts:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:17:56 +0400
>> Ivan Chernyavsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Recently I've subscribed to this list because I thought this is the
>>> right way to start being involved in Gentoo developmen
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 07:30 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:48:02 +
> > "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> >> | On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:17:56 +0400
> >> | * have some insane paranoid conviction tha
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:40:47 +0200
Thomas Pani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But people will never agree on where to draw that line. While Mike
> wants "a friendly helpful environment, where simple questions are
> most often met with patient answers and people are given the chance
> to learn, improv
Hi,
"Santiago M. Mola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There are a few things which need some kind of action before/during
> python 2.5 stabilization:
We have bug 178800, too. Either mark individual stabilisation bugs
blocking it or add them to 178800 when ccing arches.
And I don't think one or two pac
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rob Cakebread wrote:
>
>> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>> I don't know about you, but when a package can't be stabled because
>>> it's depending on Python 2.5 and current stable is broken I'd like
>>> to start reverting stable
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Mike Auty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm quite happy to continue working in a friendly helpful environment,
where simple questions are most often met with patient answers and
people are given the chance to learn, improve and help out where they
can. I'm happy to keep quie
Rob Cakebread wrote:
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> I don't know about you, but when a package can't be stabled because
>> it's depending on Python 2.5 and current stable is broken I'd like
>> to start reverting stable keywords back to ~arch as noone wants to
>> maintain broken junk. Latest being app
14 matches
Mail list logo
