On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:59:06 -0500
Doug Klima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You just answered your own question. If another package now provides
> files that an existing package provides, they must be blockers.
That's really bad policy -- it's pushing a package manager limitation
onto users in a
Duncan wrote:
Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:07:17 +:
On Friday 29 February 2008 16:15:51 Ed W wrote:
On the other hand since there still isn't a masked ebuild in portage
(and I seem some notes on my on Roy's site) then I
Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:07:17 +:
> On Friday 29 February 2008 16:15:51 Ed W wrote:
>> On the other hand since there still isn't a masked ebuild in portage
>> (and I seem some notes on my on Roy's site) then I have to as
On Friday 29 February 2008 23:23:34 Ed Wildgoose wrote:
> > [2] I use busybox as a shell and can support it when it's internal
> > start-stop-daemon applet disabled (as OpenRC has it's own variant).
>
> I guess I could just check it out instead of asking but What's
> missing from the busybox s
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Richard Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know that the amd64 team used to use the "STABLE" and "TESTED"
> keywords to indicate that an AT felt it was ok to keyword stable or
> ~arch respectively. I guess that practice went away. It doesn't work
> so well
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 20:19 +0100, Mateusz Mierzwinski wrote:
> Ok, I've try i810 and... no DRI.
Please take this off the general development mailing list and to one of
the support lists, or, even better, to our bug tracker at
http://bugs.gentoo.org instead.
Thanks,
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release
Aaron Mavrinac wrote:
This would certainly help coordinate AT efforts. Couldn't this also be
done by searching through bugzilla? Maybe with an "official" keyword,
or some sort of flag we don't otherwise use? (I'm not intensely
familiar with bugzilla internals.) Keeping it all in bugzilla seems
b
[2] I use busybox as a shell and can support it when it's internal
start-stop-daemon applet disabled (as OpenRC has it's own variant).
I guess I could just check it out instead of asking but What's
missing from the busybox s-s-daemon?
I am using the busybox version 95% successfully wit
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:49:25 -0500
Richard Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cringe when I see a stable request for some dialup
> networking package - I doubt many devs even own modems these days.
I do own few modems, but alas, no phone line to hook them up to. :)
--
Andrej "Ticho" Kacian
Benedikt Boehm wrote:
Roy Marples schrieb:
[2] I use busybox as a shell and can support it when it's internal
start-stop-daemon applet disabled (as OpenRC has it's own variant). I
don't and probably never will support vserver personally, but will
work with Gentoo developers ensuring that at l
btw: All my problem are gone ... somehow I managed to not install baselayout
from Roys
overlay, I only installed openrc.
Thanks Roy for your help!
So just to be clear, you need to install both openrc AND baselayout from
the layman profile? Sounds sensible enough
Cheers
Ed W
--
gento
Santiago M. Mola schrieb:
I splitted this from the SoC thread so the possible discussion doesn't
add noise to the original thread.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:32 PM, joshua jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Google is once again doing the summer of code for students. I'm helping
organize it
Doug Klima schrieb:
> Stefan Hellermann wrote:
>> Roy Marples schrieb:
>>
Two small things happened here:
After Login I the shell looks like:
-bash-3.2#
when I start then bash again manually it looks nice, the environment
is not
setup correctly the first time.
>
Stefan Hellermann wrote:
Roy Marples schrieb:
Two small things happened here:
After Login I the shell looks like:
-bash-3.2#
when I start then bash again manually it looks nice, the environment is not
setup correctly the first time.
Doesn't sound like an OpenRC issue as such as bash s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008.02.29 19:43, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Hello fellow devs, users and Gentoo community,
>
> here are our 2008 trustees :
>
> NeddySeagoon
> fmccor
> tsunam
> tgall
> wltjr
>
[snip]
>
> For the election officials,
>
> - --
Roy Marples schrieb:
>> Two small things happened here:
>>
>> After Login I the shell looks like:
>> -bash-3.2#
>> when I start then bash again manually it looks nice, the environment is not
>> setup correctly the first time.
>
> Doesn't sound like an OpenRC issue as such as bash sets up it's own
On Friday 29 February 2008 18:32:44 Stefan Hellermann wrote:
> I just tried openrc and I really like it! All the things changed from
> baselayout-2.0.0-rc6 are really good ideas! good work! Thanks!
:)
> Two small things happened here:
>
> After Login I the shell looks like:
> -bash-3.2#
> when I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello fellow devs, users and Gentoo community,
here are our 2008 trustees :
NeddySeagoon
fmccor
tsunam
tgall
wltjr
Master ballot and personal confirmation emails will follow.
Thanks to Shyam for the technical support :)
Congratulations t
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Richard Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rémi Cardona wrote:
> >
> > +1 on that idea, using bugzilla with an external tool for keyword
> > requests is a good idea.
> >
> > The tool could do bugzilla research to see if the keyword has already
> > been requested a
I just tried openrc and I really like it! All the things changed from
baselayout-2.0.0-rc6
are really good ideas! good work! Thanks!
>
> But bugs are still being found and fixed - although at a slow rate :)
>
Two small things happened here:
After Login I the shell looks like:
-bash-3.2#
when
On Friday 29 February 2008 13:13:16 Richard Freeman wrote:
> Rémi Cardona wrote:
> > +1 on that idea, using bugzilla with an external tool for keyword
> > requests is a good idea.
> >
> > The tool could do bugzilla research to see if the keyword has already
> > been requested and point the user to
Rémi Cardona wrote:
+1 on that idea, using bugzilla with an external tool for keyword
requests is a good idea.
The tool could do bugzilla research to see if the keyword has already
been requested and point the user to the corresponding bug report,
hopefully limiting the number of dupes.
Roy Marples schrieb:
[2] I use busybox as a shell and can support it when it's internal
start-stop-daemon applet disabled (as OpenRC has it's own variant). I don't
and probably never will support vserver personally, but will work with Gentoo
developers ensuring that at least one version works.
Check your idea into cvs.. ;)
On 2/29/08, JoseAlberto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have some ideas to improve GNAP (last year was a nice experience):
>
> - live upgrade
> - squashfs pkgs
> - unionfs
>
> i think this 3 task can fit in only one project.
>
> - use new catalyst
>
> This is the
On Friday 29 February 2008 16:15:51 Ed W wrote:
> On the other hand since there still isn't a masked ebuild in portage
> (and I seem some notes on my on Roy's site) then I have to assume that
> in fact we are still a good way away from calling it a replacement and
> starting to push it out to users
On Friday 29 February 2008 15:56:44 Ed W wrote:
> Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > Check out OpenRC it is baselayout successor and works great!
>
> Funnily enough I came across this earlier today for different reasons.
> However, I hadn't realised that it was a full baselayout competitor?
>
> Does Roy hang
Ed W wrote:
Hi
baselayout-2 was renamed to openrc when Roy left Gentoo as an
official dev.
Answering my own question (for the record). I found some explanation
here:
http://lycos.dropcode.net/gregarius/author.php?author=Roy_Marples__uberlord_
Does Roy hang out here? Roy: Is this intende
Hi
baselayout-2 was renamed to openrc when Roy left Gentoo as an official
dev.
Answering my own question (for the record). I found some explanation here:
http://lycos.dropcode.net/gregarius/author.php?author=Roy_Marples__uberlord_
Does Roy hang out here? Roy: Is this intended to be a baselay
Ed W wrote:
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Check out OpenRC it is baselayout successor and works great!
Funnily enough I came across this earlier today for different
reasons. However, I hadn't realised that it was a full baselayout
competitor?
baselayout-2 was renamed to openrc when Roy left Gent
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Check out OpenRC it is baselayout successor and works great!
Funnily enough I came across this earlier today for different reasons.
However, I hadn't realised that it was a full baselayout competitor?
Does Roy hang out here? Roy: Is this intended to be a baselayout
Check out OpenRC it is baselayout successor and works great!
On 2/29/08, Ed W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it dead..? Is anyone still working on it?
>
> I have had a lot of success using it for linux vservers and in an
> embedded build. Would really hate to see it stall though...?
>
> What
Is it dead..? Is anyone still working on it?
I have had a lot of success using it for linux vservers and in an
embedded build. Would really hate to see it stall though...?
What are the big picture items still missing? Seems that it's close to
becoming a stable upgrade? I have filed a few m
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hi,
is anyone working on eselect?
V-Li
peper told me he'd wrap up a few bugs and make a release this week after
I was about to go touching eselect all over when we know my C/C++ is
better then my bash.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
I have some ideas to improve GNAP (last year was a nice experience):
- live upgrade
- squashfs pkgs
- unionfs
i think this 3 task can fit in only one project.
- use new catalyst
This is the hardest one adn must be a different project.
regards
El mar, 26-02-2008 a las 10:32 -0800, joshua jacks
Hi.
As was announced many times before, the voting period for the election
ended at 23:59:59 UTC yesterday.
We are currently counting the votes and will announce the winner and
send the master ballot asap - hopefully, in a few hours.
For the election officials,
--
Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto)
You're hijacking threads again. Please stop.
If you have an issue, file a bug report at http://bugs.gentoo.org/ The
-dev mailing list is the _wrong_ place for that.
Thanks
--
Rémi Cardona
LRI, INRIA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Peter Volkov a écrit :
В Чтв, 28/02/2008 в 21:49 -0500, Richard Freeman пишет:
Santiago M. Mola wrote:
What do you think about? Would it be easy to integrate it with
packages.g.o or should it belong somewhere else? Do you think this is
a suitable project for SoC?
I like the idea, although it i
В Чтв, 28/02/2008 в 21:49 -0500, Richard Freeman пишет:
> Santiago M. Mola wrote:
> > What do you think about? Would it be easy to integrate it with
> > packages.g.o or should it belong somewhere else? Do you think this is
> > a suitable project for SoC?
>
> I like the idea, although it is a bit
Hi,
is anyone working on eselect?
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
http://www.faulhammer.org/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
39 matches
Mail list logo
