On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 07:12 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Except it won't, because ebuilds require bash regardless of which
> package manager is being used. If you want to change that you'll have to
> rewrite the entire tree.
Az once said near enough the same thing about baselayout. And that's
y
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 23:18:43 +
Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> paludis requires tr1-whatever libs
4.1 ships those, so you don't need to do anything there.
> Maybe one day Gentoo will have a PM that doesn't require any of that
> and is just written in C and sh, using POSIX libc where
Attached are the packages scheduled for removal this week, extended
one day to include the treecleaners cleanup.
--
looks like christmas at fifty-five degrees
this latitude weekens my knees
EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 16:21 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> we want the installed environment to be portable, not the build environment.
> i do not see any benefit from forcing the build environment to be pure POSIX
> compliant and i see many many detrimental problems.
Oh I don't know. Imagine h
On Monday 05 November 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 14:21 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> > > Actually you missed the mark completely.
> > > Nothing in the tree itself specifies what shell to use - instead it's
> > > the package manager. So the PM on Gentoo/Linux/FreeBSD *c
On 05-11-2007 20:32:09 +, Roy Marples wrote:
> > > > More (generic) unix-able.
> > >
> > > Exactly so :)
> >
> > Not really as long as not being bourne shell compatible like autoconf's
> > configure. I won't trust to have a POSIX shell like /bin/ksh everywhere,
> > but /bin/sh only, which usu
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 14:21 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> > Actually you missed the mark completely.
> > Nothing in the tree itself specifies what shell to use - instead it's
> > the package manager. So the PM on Gentoo/Linux/FreeBSD *could*
> > be /bin/sh and on the systems where /bin/sh
On Monday 05 November 2007, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 10:13 +, Roy Marples wrote:
> > While I still have access to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] email, I'll respond here.
> >
> > On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 10:22 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 00:47
On Monday 05 November 2007, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On E, 2007-11-05 at 16:19 +0100, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I think it's time to add a more general flag for enabling visibility
> > support in packages as currently there is only a kde specific one
> > (kdehiddenvisibility) and I
On 14:58 Mon 05 Nov , Piotr Jaroszynski (peper) wrote:
> 1.1 sys-apps/paludis/paludis-0.26.0_alpha3.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/paludis/paludis-0.26.0_alpha3.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/view
On 14:23 Mon 05 Nov , Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
> 1.1 net-firewall/ipset/ipset-2.3.0.20070828.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-firewall/ipset/ipset-2.3.0.20070828.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.p
On 11:17 Mon 05 Nov , Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
> On Friday 02 November 2007 02:59:36 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Could you drop the icc USE flag? All you need to do is make sure this
> > package respects CC, CFLAGS and LDFLAGS, and users can take care of the
> > rest in make.conf.
> >
> I never
Piotr Jaroszyński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think it's time to add a more general flag for enabling visibility support
> in packages as currently there is only a kde specific one
> (kdehiddenvisibility) and I don't think it makes sense to add a new one for
> each package that needs it.
S
# Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05 Nov 2007)
# Masked for treecleaners, removed in 60 days.
# See http://tinyurl.com/yu5t35 for references.
net-im/jit
sys-apps/tcng
net-analyzer/snmpmon
mail-client/elmo
net-im/jud
sys-apps/yard
mail-client/sylpheed-claws
app-editors/beaver
media-radio/ktrack
With Uberlord's retirement we should do the usual magic voodoo
procedure to summon in the next-in-line member (which would be Jokey if
i'm not mistaken).
cheers,
Wernfried
--
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org
Gentoo Forums - http://forums.gentoo.org
forum-mods (at) gentoo.org
On E, 2007-11-05 at 16:19 +0100, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think it's time to add a more general flag for enabling visibility support
> in packages as currently there is only a kde specific one
> (kdehiddenvisibility) and I don't think it makes sense to add a new one for
> each pa
Hello,
I think it's time to add a more general flag for enabling visibility support
in packages as currently there is only a kde specific one
(kdehiddenvisibility) and I don't think it makes sense to add a new one for
each package that needs it.
I have just added a local "visibility" flag for p
On Friday 02 November 2007 02:59:36 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Could you drop the icc USE flag? All you need to do is make sure this
> package respects CC, CFLAGS and LDFLAGS, and users can take care of the
> rest in make.conf.
>
I never put it in and just left it alone as I don't use ICC. I have dro
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 10:13 +, Roy Marples wrote:
> While I still have access to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] email, I'll respond here.
>
>
> On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 10:22 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 00:47 +, Roy Marples wrote:
> >
> > As it seems too few people
While I still have access to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] email, I'll respond here.
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 10:22 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 00:47 +, Roy Marples wrote:
>
> As it seems too few people really accept your suggestion, I feel it's
> time for me to chime in
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 00:47 +, Roy Marples wrote:
As it seems too few people really accept your suggestion, I feel it's
time for me to chime in too, although I don't know what exactly POSIX-sh
standard defines.
> On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 01:19 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > On 02-11-2007 17:35
On 18:58 Sun 04 Nov , Caleb Tennis (caleb) wrote:
> 1.1 sys-libs/db/db-4.6.21.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-libs/db/db-4.6.21.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-libs/db/db-4.6.21
22 matches
Mail list logo
