On Monday 05 November 2007, Roy Marples wrote: > On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 14:21 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > > > Actually you missed the mark completely. > > > Nothing in the tree itself specifies what shell to use - instead it's > > > the package manager. So the PM on Gentoo/Linux/FreeBSD *could* > > > be /bin/sh and on the systems where /bin/sh is not possible to change > > > to a POSIX compliant shell then it can still use /bin/bash or wherever > > > it's installed. > > > > So "have the installed scripts to not require bash" is another topic ? > > No, it's a valid topic.
he didnt say it was invalid, just a different topic > Either the profile could hook src_unpack or the ebuild could call a > function to do this > > sed -e '1 s,^#!/bin/sh,#!/path/to/bash,' fix the packages i say -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
