Andrey Falko wrote:
> I am not 100% sure if this is possible, but may a non-dev like myself
> take up its maintenance? I use rpm a fair amount and know a decent
> amount about it (I maintain a RHEL4 server + I wrote my B.A. Thesis on
> package mangers). Taking a quick look
> (http://bugs.gentoo.or
On 8/24/07, Steen Eugen Poulsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthias Langer skrev:
> >> http://www.arcdraco.net/~dragon/checkrestart
> >> (Needs lsb-release, portage-utils, lsof and python)
> >>
> >
> > looks interesting indeed... whats also interesting: is there a reason
> > for lsb-release (a sh
Duncan skrev:
> I'm not sure what other sorts of "random stuff" Debian includes in their
> package, but IMO this one would fit right in with gentoolkit.
> "Collection of administrative scripts for Gentoo." Yeah, that sounds
> about right. =8^)
debian-goodies is a gentoolkit/portage-utils pack
Matthias Langer skrev:
>> http://www.arcdraco.net/~dragon/checkrestart
>> (Needs lsb-release, portage-utils, lsof and python)
>>
>
> looks interesting indeed... whats also interesting: is there a reason
> for lsb-release (a shell script) to be keyworded for x86 only?
Ugh, another issue with it.
Thanks!
Is there any roadmap for stabilizing python-2.5(as in weeks,months,
decades?) ;)
If anything goes into the GWN I think people running 'arch' would like to know
when they will be affected.
On Thursday 23 August 2007 11:01:02 Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Thanks to an increased n
Steen Eugen Poulsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 24 Aug 2007
06:18:33 +0200:
> I'm working with 'upstream' to get some form of multi distribution
> support included at the source. The current version, I made, does run on
> Debian, Ubuntu and Gentoo, witho
On Friday 24 August 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
> case "$(declare -p "$1" 2>/dev/null)" in
/me stabs excessive quoting
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
> http://www.arcdraco.net/~dragon/checkrestart
> (Needs lsb-release, portage-utils, lsof and python)
>
looks interesting indeed... whats also interesting: is there a reason
for lsb-release (a shell script) to be keyworded for x86 only?
matthias
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 00:33 +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
> I mentioned to the vserver list that i was interested to convert the
> scripts to POSIX. First he said that he was not against it until he
> realized he could no longer use arrays.
>
> http://www.paul.sladen.org/vserver/archives/200708/0025
