Steve Dibb wrote:
> Dominique Michel wrote:
>
>> I fully agree, theology is the worst possible name if the herd will
>> include
>> both religious and scientific softwares.
>
> No worries, app-misc/gramps was dropped from the theology herd, and is
> herdless once again.
It's interesting that peop
Dominique Michel wrote:
I fully agree, theology is the worst possible name if the herd will include
both religious and scientific softwares.
No worries, app-misc/gramps was dropped from the theology herd, and is herdless
once again.
Steve
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Michael Cummings wrote:
>> Worth a shot, it seemed to work last time (and I just noticed that a
>> neglected
>> -dev mail folder is a bad thing).
>
> We're working on getting X.Org 7.2 stable. The hot new stuff, video
> hotplugging et al, is in xorg-server 1.3 and xf86-vid
Drake Wyrm wrote:
> Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:54:00AM +0200, Steffen Brumm wrote:
>>> and darwin is satan, other beliefs than christianity - death
>>> penalty, fight the sciences, womans have to go behind the cooker or
>>> into the open flame, only cons
Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:54:00AM +0200, Steffen Brumm wrote:
> > and darwin is satan, other beliefs than christianity - death
> > penalty, fight the sciences, womans have to go behind the cooker or
> > into the open flame, only conservapedia is real,...
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Have you got a reference for it?
That's how it is in XHTML, so I thought it's common practice in XML as
well. That probably isn't true, so sorry for noise.
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 10:57 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:57:27AM -0700, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > > In light of the above, how about 'automatic=0'?
> > Please keep with your original idea of letting maintainers opt out vs
> > some of the ideas proposed in this thread where
Michael Cummings wrote:
Worth a shot, it seemed to work last time (and I just noticed that a neglected
-dev mail folder is a bad thing).
We're working on getting X.Org 7.2 stable. The hot new stuff, video
hotplugging et al, is in xorg-server 1.3 and xf86-video-i810 2.0. Other
drivers remain t
Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Taking into account the other reasonable input, how about the name of
> attribute 'automatic-bug' ?
I would like "assign" somewhere in the name, but i'd be fine with your
proposal as well.
--
Regards, Matti Bickel
Encrypted/Signed Email preferred
pg
Le Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:59:25 +0200,
Alexandre Buisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 11:25:01 +0200, Duncan wrote:
> > > It's a very good question, it was posed at the time, it was never
> > > answered and at last we can now say it was almost completely ignored.
> >
> > I
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:57:27AM -0700, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > In light of the above, how about 'automatic=0'?
> Please keep with your original idea of letting maintainers opt out vs
> some of the ideas proposed in this thread where maintainers have to opt
> in as I'm sure the metadata.xml files won
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:01:13PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I intend that the first non-excluded maintainer entry is the one used
> > for the automatic process.
> This could even make the need for "contact=0|1" unneccessary (since at least
> one bugzilla account should be a valid assign
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 10:32:25AM +0200, Jan Kundr?t wrote:
> AFAIK the preferred way of specifying boolean values in XML is to use
> contact="contact", not contact="1".
I can't find this described anywhere in the XML specification
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/
Have you got a reference for it?
>
It's a rather rare occasion in my case [1], but i actually used CVS a
couple of minutes ago. No worries, the tree is still safe from me, i
just (finally) uploaded the project page for the proctors [2].
I hope it answers all the questions people have been asking me every
now and then, like how to co
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 20:12 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
> Any other cool updates in the last few weeks? (it's been 20 days since
> the last time I started this thread - at this rate, we might make enough input
> to make Chris' job on the gwn easier).
>
For Gnome, 2.18.1 is almost entirely in t
Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:00:41 -0400:
> Duncan wrote:
>> I'm running (vanilla) rc7-git10 ATM, and have two possible regressions
>> remaining here
>
> If reproducible on gentoo-soures-2.6.21, please file bug reports for
> t
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Daniel Drake kirjoitti:
>> Petteri Räty wrote:
>>> Why would the kernel have to go stable before the usual month dictated
>>> by policy? Yes there are usually security bugs but you did not mention
>>> that as a reason in your post.
>> At last check this was a recommendation, n
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 22:01 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:33:50AM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> > > Both 'assign' and 'cc' (and derivations thereof are not suitable).
> > notification=assignment|cc|none ?
> This is to answer expose's question as well, but the attribute
Daniel Drake kirjoitti:
> Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Why would the kernel have to go stable before the usual month dictated
>> by policy? Yes there are usually security bugs but you did not mention
>> that as a reason in your post.
>
> At last check this was a recommendation, not a policy, plus nobody
Duncan wrote:
I'm running (vanilla) rc7-git10 ATM, and have two possible regressions
remaining here
If reproducible on gentoo-soures-2.6.21, please file bug reports for
them or they will get lost.
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Petteri Räty wrote:
Why would the kernel have to go stable before the usual month dictated
by policy? Yes there are usually security bugs but you did not mention
that as a reason in your post.
At last check this was a recommendation, not a policy, plus nobody
objected timeframe-wise before.
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:56:44 +0200
Matti Bickel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I shall contemplate fiercely on building my own herd of nightly
> > bloodsuckers, zombies and cannibals. I don't know whether to call it
> > 'postnuclear-vampirism' or just pl
On 4/27/07, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/26/07, Joshua Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> > It should take devaway into account.
> >
> why? Seriously, dev-away != dev retired... having it take devaway into
> account is pointless in my opinio
Josh Sled wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 20:03 -0600, Steve Dibb wrote:
The idea came up a few months ago about creating a 'religion' herd. I finally
got around to following through, and with robbat2's help, created the 'theology'
herd.
The basic description is to take care of packages relatin
On 4/26/07, Joshua Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> On 4/26/07, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Case 2 - Metadata contains a single maintainer
>> --
>> - The herd field is not used.
>> - The maintainer addr
Jakub Moc ha scritto:
> On 4/27/07, Dawid Węgliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a):
>> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:03:02 -0600
>> > Steve Dibb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Sweet. Are you gonna bring back those Gentoo icons that mysteriously
>> >> disappeared? :)
>> >
>>
+# Krzysiek Pawlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (27 Apr 2007)
+# Mask binary-only version of jcs, please use dev-java/jcs,
+# will be removed from the tree around end of May.
+dev-java/jcs-bin
+
"end of May" is 27 of May ;)
--
Krzysiek Pawlik key id: 0xBC51
desktop-misc, desktop-dock, x86, java
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> [...] the attribute should only indicate if the maintainer entry should be
> used for any automatic process at all, not how to use it.
Oh, I thought you were talking about the name of the variable.
> I intend that the first non-excluded maintainer entry is the one used
>
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:00:18 +0300
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ grep javahelp -r /usr/portage/profiles/updates/
> /usr/portage/profiles/updates/3Q-2004:move dev-java/javahelp
> dev-java/javahelp-bin
>
> Well nowadays Sun has put javahelp under GPL so now we have
>... and if it's more convenient for them in a
> theology herd, why should it be a problem for those not interested in the
> package? It might raise a few eyebrows here or there, but if it's being
> well maintained,
that is the problem, because what is theology? only christianity, only islam?
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 11:25:01 +0200, Duncan wrote:
> > It's a very good question, it was posed at the time, it was never
> > answered and at last we can now say it was almost completely ignored.
>
> I (and I expect others who know) didn't answer this before, as it would
> have been too easy to
Daniel Drake kirjoitti:
>
> This means that we may be pushing for 2.6.21 stable on x86 and amd64 on
> May 17th. If important issues come up (which they may well do), this
> will obviously be delayed, but do keep this date in mind.
>
Why would the kernel have to go stable before the usual month di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It would be nice if there where some CD/DVD labels created, that people
could print and put on their LiveCDs/InstallCDs :-)
Bjarke
Dawid Węgliński skrev:
> Hi there
> As a fresh developer i would like to introduce you all new subproject I
> have just
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:16:26 -0700:
> As no one was actually fixing any of the remaining bugs that were
> reported, what were the kernel developers supposed to do, just sit
> around and wait another week for no reason?
I wasn
Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 27
Apr 2007 07:24:18 +0200:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:11:26 -0400
> Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If that's the case, might not "humanities" be a better name?
>>
>> E.g., I don't know what genealogy
On 4/27/07, Dawid Węgliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a):
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:03:02 -0600
> Steve Dibb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sweet. Are you gonna bring back those Gentoo icons that mysteriously
>> disappeared? :)
>
> The ones with the copyright problems?
>
Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a):
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:03:02 -0600
> Steve Dibb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sweet. Are you gonna bring back those Gentoo icons that mysteriously
>> disappeared? :)
>
> The ones with the copyright problems?
>
I'm out of topic i think. Could you amplify, please?
-
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> In terms of implementing this in the DTD, I'm going to specify that
> 'contact=1' (or whatever name we settle on) is the default, so that we
> don't break validation of any existing metadata:
>
>contact (0|1) 1 -- should this maintainer be used by
>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:54:00AM +0200, Steffen Brumm wrote:
> and darwin is satan, other beliefs than christianity - death penalty, fight
> the sciences, womans have to go behind the cooker or into the open flame,
> only conservapedia is real,...
This certainly is an interesting first post to
Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I shall contemplate fiercely on building my own herd of nightly
> bloodsuckers, zombies and cannibals. I don't know whether to call it
> 'postnuclear-vampirism' or just plain 'satanism' yet.
I'm interested. Will you bring back xmms? Will your program inc
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:03:02 -0600
Steve Dibb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sweet. Are you gonna bring back those Gentoo icons that mysteriously
> disappeared? :)
The ones with the copyright problems?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
41 matches
Mail list logo
