On 4/27/07, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/26/07, Joshua Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> > It should take devaway into account.
> >
> why? Seriously, dev-away != dev retired... having it take devaway into
> account is pointless in my opinion as it won't improve it being properly
> assigned...as it'll be covered in other cases, and its not like there's
> not bugs for all of us dev's that have not sat there for a month or so,
> at some point
I meant if a maintainer is away, his/her herd should be assignee with
him/her CCed.
Eh; if the maintainer has been away for months (a.k.a MIA), then
yeah... otherwise, no reason for this if someone's away for a week.
Sorry to disappoint you and others here, but the scripts will lack
artificial intelligence and frankly I don't see what exactly are you
expecting from this whole thing. Anyway, good luck. ;)
--
Jakub Moc
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
