Re: [gentoo-dev] LAMP Server beauty contest: server monitoring

2006-10-01 Thread Anatoly Shipitsin
2006/10/2, Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi,One of the things that the LAMP Server seed will install will besomething to do automatic server monitoring - CPU, RAM, swap, diskspace, bandwidth, and so on.I'm a cacti user myself on my own boxes, but I'm interested to hear if anyone has any stron

Re: [gentoo-dev] LAMP Server beauty contest: server monitoring

2006-10-01 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 09:41:08PM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote: > Please reply to the list naming your favourite tool for this job, and why. Ok, something is not clear here at all. Do you intend to provide all statistics via SNMPd (writing agents to provide the data that net-snmp doesn't provide d

Re: [gentoo-dev] LAMP Server beauty contest: server monitoring

2006-10-01 Thread Nick Devito
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 21:41 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote: > Hi, > > One of the things that the LAMP Server seed will install will be > something to do automatic server monitoring - CPU, RAM, swap, disk > space, bandwidth, and so on. > > I'm a cacti user myself on my own boxes, but I'm interested t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] CFLAGS paragraph for the GWN

2006-10-01 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:23:37 + (UTC) "Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], > excerpted below, on Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:37:05 -0600: > > > If you want flags that just break > > stuff with 4.1 you can include -ftree-vectorize. > > Could you

[gentoo-dev] LAMP Server beauty contest: server monitoring

2006-10-01 Thread Stuart Herbert
Hi, One of the things that the LAMP Server seed will install will be something to do automatic server monitoring - CPU, RAM, swap, disk space, bandwidth, and so on. I'm a cacti user myself on my own boxes, but I'm interested to hear if anyone has any strong preference for an alternative tool. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Setting number of parallel builds for other build-systems than 'make'

2006-10-01 Thread Brian Harring
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 09:52:14AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Tiziano Müller wrote: > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >Hash: SHA1 > > > >Hi everyone > > > >It seems that setting the number of parallel builds using '-jN' does not > >only work for make, but also for scons and bjam (and may

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-perl] Candidates for removal from dev-perl]

2006-10-01 Thread Jakub Moc
Michael Cummings wrote: > On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 15:48 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: >> Michael Cummings wrote: >> >>> Geo-IP >> Can you please leave this one, it's rather useful :) >> >> > Just let me know what in the tree is using it :) > > > Mind you, the actual removal of packages will be a group >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: treecleaner removals

2006-10-01 Thread David Grant
On 9/28/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote:> Tach David,  0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)>> David Grant schrieb:>> On 9/28/06, Michael Cummings < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>>> +++ Mark Stier [28/09/06 15:35 +0200]: How about enter

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Setting number of parallel builds for other build-systems than 'make'

2006-10-01 Thread Tiziano Müller
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:23:16 +0200 Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > | > On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:04:52 +0200 Tiziano Müller > | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | > | Now, SCONSOPTS (BJAMOPTS respectively) could be added to make.conf > |

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Setting number of parallel builds for other build-systems than 'make'

2006-10-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:23:16 +0200 Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:04:52 +0200 Tiziano Müller | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > | Now, SCONSOPTS (BJAMOPTS respectively) could be added to make.conf | > | and used whenever one of those bu

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] CFLAGS paragraph for the GWN

2006-10-01 Thread Ryan Hill
Duncan wrote: > Could you point me at some info on this one (-ftree-vectorize)? It came > up on the amd64 list a week or so ago, when someone asked what I thought > of it and why I didn't have it in my cflags (which I had just explained). > I said I didn't know enough about it to make a case eit

[gentoo-dev] Re: Setting number of parallel builds for other build-systems than 'make'

2006-10-01 Thread Tiziano Müller
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:04:52 +0200 Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | Now, SCONSOPTS (BJAMOPTS respectively) could be added to make.conf > | and used whenever one of those build-systems is being used. But we > | would probably have to add a ...OPTS for every b

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-perl] Candidates for removal from dev-perl]

2006-10-01 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Sunday 01 October 2006 19:06, Michael Cummings wrote: > Just let me know what in the tree is using it :) awstats, optionally. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE pgplwsOgPY7kC.pgp Description:

[gentoo-dev] Modular X: Feel free to drop DEPEND on xextproto

2006-10-01 Thread Donnie Berkholz
I just added xextproto to the RDEPEND of libXext, so anything that pulls in libXext no longer needs an explicit DEPEND on xextproto as well. Feel free to drop xextproto from any package with an RDEPEND on libXext, libXp, libXaw, libXmu, etc. Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing lis

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-perl] Candidates for removal from dev-perl]

2006-10-01 Thread Michael Cummings
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 15:48 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: > Michael Cummings wrote: > > > Geo-IP > > Can you please leave this one, it's rather useful :) > > Just let me know what in the tree is using it :) Mind you, the actual removal of packages will be a group effort/confirmation (at the very le

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] CFLAGS paragraph for the GWN

2006-10-01 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Sunday 01 October 2006 18:49, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > I can't give you reasons, but I can tell you it totally broke my x86 > system a while back. -ftree-vectorize on x86 and PowerPC is known to create broken executables (when it comes to actually create the executable). I'm using it on AMD64 f

Re: [gentoo-dev] Setting number of parallel builds for other build-systems than 'make'

2006-10-01 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Tiziano Müller wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone It seems that setting the number of parallel builds using '-jN' does not only work for make, but also for scons and bjam (and maybe others as well). Since it isn't save to assume that '-jN' is the only option in MAK

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] CFLAGS paragraph for the GWN

2006-10-01 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Duncan wrote: Could you point me at some info on this one (-ftree-vectorize)? It came up on the amd64 list a week or so ago, when someone asked what I thought of it and why I didn't have it in my cflags (which I had just explained). I said I didn't know enough about it to make a case either way

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-perl] Candidates for removal from dev-perl]

2006-10-01 Thread Seemant Kulleen
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 15:48 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: > Michael Cummings wrote: > > > Geo-IP > > Can you please leave this one, it's rather useful :) What's its use? Furthermore, does its used get decreased through the employment of g-cpan to install it? Thanks, -- Seemant Kulleen Developer, G

[gentoo-dev] last rites for net-im/gabber and dev-libs/jabberoo

2006-10-01 Thread Olivier Crête
Hi, There have been no release since June 2004, the newer versions have p.masked since 2004. The older versions doesnt build. They have open bugs #62182, #88929 and #101581. I'll remove them on November 1st. -- Olivier Crête [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally si

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-perl] Candidates for removal from dev-perl]

2006-10-01 Thread Jakub Moc
Michael Cummings wrote: > Geo-IP Can you please leave this one, it's rather useful :) -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-perl] Candidates for removal from dev-perl]

2006-10-01 Thread Michael Cummings
Mark it in the meta then. or learn to use g-cpan. On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 15:19 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Sunday 01 October 2006 15:08, Michael Cummings wrote: > > RPC-XML > This is needed for CIA commit scripts, might be a good idea to leave it there > for who uses Gentoo as SCM

Re: [gentoo-dev] Setting number of parallel builds for other build-systems than 'make'

2006-10-01 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Sunday 01 October 2006 15:04, Tiziano Müller wrote: > What do you think? Better ideas? Look at app-i18n/skim . I do parse MAKEOPTS to use the -j* and -s options with scons. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, S

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-perl] Candidates for removal from dev-perl]

2006-10-01 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Sunday 01 October 2006 15:08, Michael Cummings wrote: > RPC-XML This is needed for CIA commit scripts, might be a good idea to leave it there for who uses Gentoo as SCM server. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD6

[gentoo-dev] Setting number of parallel builds for other build-systems than 'make'

2006-10-01 Thread Tiziano Müller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone It seems that setting the number of parallel builds using '-jN' does not only work for make, but also for scons and bjam (and maybe others as well). Since it isn't save to assume that '-jN' is the only option in MAKEOPTS, some filtering is

[gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-perl] Candidates for removal from dev-perl]

2006-10-01 Thread Michael Cummings
This message was originally posted on gentoo-perl so it could fester and mature a little first (but then I jumped the gun and decided to post it here :). OK, I've done an initial weeding of this list and taken out the obvious "we wouldn't be a distro without these" packages. The following list are

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] CFLAGS paragraph for the GWN

2006-10-01 Thread Duncan
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:37:05 -0600: > If you want flags that just break > stuff with 4.1 you can include -ftree-vectorize. Could you point me at some info on this one (-ftree-vectorize)? It came up on the amd64 list a week

[gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for October

2006-10-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) ! If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev l

[gentoo-dev] treecleaner maskings

2006-10-01 Thread Christian Heim
# Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01 Oct 2006) # masking media-radio/ax25-tools for treecleaners, bug(s) 97275 # Pending removal Oct 29th media-radio/ax25-tools # Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01 Oct 2006) # masking x11-libs/buffy for treecleaners, bug(s) 103143 # Pending removal Oct 29t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Profile masking and profiles package.mask

2006-10-01 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Monday 02 October 2006 16:03, Jason Stubbs wrote: > 1) Specifying >=sys-libs/glibc-2.4 and thus a corresponding entry in package.mask ... is redundant -- Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Profile masking and profiles package.mask

2006-10-01 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Saturday 30 September 2006 04:40, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > This is a discussion to follow up bug #149508 [1]. Posted on the bug before noticing there was a -dev thread. """ Just about everybody has the wrong idea here. 1) Specifying =sys-libs/glibc-2.4 and thus a corresponding entry