One of the problems with democracy is that people pretty much get what
they want. If there was enough support for devrel to actually execute
the current policies (like preventing developers from calling people
names on this list), it would happen. However it seems to me that not
many people would b
Tach Luis, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Luis Medinas schrieb:
> If noone takes it will be saved on overlays.gentoo.org. Everyone needs
> to know that xmms is old and tired (obsolete).
Having discussed Gentoo Status in this list: Maybe you should announce
that in GWN
On Thursday 24 August 2006 02:17, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> When I think about where Gentoo was when we turned into a democracy
> years ago, and where Gentoo is now, I don't see much of a difference on
> the large scale. We lack any global vision for where Gentoo is going, we
> can't agree on who
On 8/23/06, Josh Saddler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, don't dump a product that's not even near alpha status on users. If we want
to keep using software that's old, but works just fine, why force a really
stupid switch?
Saying xmms works "just fine" is a bit of stretch IMO. My most hated
xmm
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 23:32, Luis Medinas wrote:
> If noone takes it will be saved on overlays.gentoo.org. Everyone needs
> to know that xmms is old and tired (obsolete). A few developers on
> redhat, mandriva and suse marked xmms as obsolete. Now it's our turn to
> move it to our darkness re
Luis Medinas wrote:
> If noone takes it will be saved on overlays.gentoo.org. Everyone needs
> to know that xmms is old and tired (obsolete). A few developers on
> redhat, mandriva and suse marked xmms as obsolete. Now it's our turn to
> move it to our darkness repository. If you want to be sure i
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 23:23, lnxg33k wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > use this instead ... makes for cleaner output:
> > pushd "${BUILDDIR}" > /dev/null
>
> Would `cd foo` and `cd -` work just as well in place of `pushd` and `popd`?
> Recent tip I ran across and wondering if it holds up acr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Ostrow wrote:
>
>
>> If I could go back in time a couple of years and prevent this democracy
>> from ever happening, I would. If I could fix these problems myself, I
>> would. But it requires buy-in from the entire Gentoo community if we're
>>
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 20:11 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
> Please don't remove it, and don't replace it with xmms2. There are far too
> many
> media type plugins that work for xmms that audacious and similar players can't
> handle. Also, will xmms plugins even work in xmms2? And isn't xmms2 still a
Mike Frysinger wrote:
use this instead ... makes for cleaner output:
pushd "${BUILDDIR}" > /dev/null
Would `cd foo` and `cd -` work just as well in place of `pushd` and `popd`?
Recent tip I ran across and wondering if it holds up across the board.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luis Medinas wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 20:07 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 16:30, Luis Medinas wrote:
>>> So i'm asking for a solution either remove xmms, move the maintainer for
>>> anyone who volunteer or the sound
Luis Medinas wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 20:07 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 16:30, Luis Medinas wrote:
>>> So i'm asking for a solution either remove xmms, move the maintainer for
>>> anyone who volunteer or the sound herd.
>> no one has answered the previous probl
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 20:07 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 16:30, Luis Medinas wrote:
> > So i'm asking for a solution either remove xmms, move the maintainer for
> > anyone who volunteer or the sound herd.
>
> no one has answered the previous problems ... xmms is the o
> If I could go back in time a couple of years and prevent this democracy
> from ever happening, I would. If I could fix these problems myself, I
> would. But it requires buy-in from the entire Gentoo community if we're
> to do anything about it.
First of suffice it to say that many a time in
I just posted this to my blog [1], but I know you don't all read it so I
wanted to post it here as well. Do read all the way through. I very
rarely write anything this long, and when I do, it's something I feel
very strongly about.
I started my fourth year as a Gentoo developer in June, and Gentoo
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 16:30, Luis Medinas wrote:
> So i'm asking for a solution either remove xmms, move the maintainer for
> anyone who volunteer or the sound herd.
no one has answered the previous problems ... xmms is the only audioplayer
that actually works on some platforms ...
plus, h
xmms2 and audacious sound good ;)
Luis Medinas wrote:
Hi everyone.
I'm the current maintainer for xmms and all plugins. As you all know
xmms is writen over GTK+-1. This toolkit is not supported by the
upstream like xmms. We have lot's of dead upstream plugins on portage
and this is a pain to ma
Hi everyone.
I'm the current maintainer for xmms and all plugins. As you all know
xmms is writen over GTK+-1. This toolkit is not supported by the
upstream like xmms. We have lot's of dead upstream plugins on portage
and this is a pain to maintain like xmms itself. You might want to look
at our pa
On Aug 23, 2006, at 3:54 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
On the plus side it would be much easier to find duplicate bugs
since
the titles would be uniform.
I think this is an interesting point. I'd like to have something
like a
specialised bug system for ebuilds, where you have to enter the
packa
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 02:06, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Bringing up something I proposed previously... How about having teams
> that are considered 'important' (not a fixed list; this can vary
> depending upon what's going on) or 'to be having issues' deliver status
> reports to the council for t
Philipp Riegger wrote:
> On Aug 16, 2006, at 4:04 PM, Mike Bonar wrote:
>
>> On the plus side it would be much easier to find duplicate bugs since
>> the titles would be uniform.
>
> I think this is an interesting point. I'd like to have something like a
> specialised bug system for ebuilds, wher
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 03:01:19PM +0200, Robert Szentmihalyi wrote:
> does any of the Gentoo kernel sources in Portage contain the nfs-ngroups
> patch (http://www.frankvm.com/nfs-ngroups/)?
> I'm looking for an easily maintainable solution to bypass the NFS limitation
> of 16 groups per user.
A
Hi,
does any of the Gentoo kernel sources in Portage contain the nfs-ngroups patch
(http://www.frankvm.com/nfs-ngroups/)?
I'm looking for an easily maintainable solution to bypass the NFS limitation of
16 groups per user.
Thanks,
Robert
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 14:39, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> Use the aplay binary provided by alsa-utils.
>
> Paul
Try playing KDE_Beep.ogg with it :-)
--
Regards,
Abhay
pgpK6w5SPUriy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> Have they already done the ebuild quiz?
>
> I would love to have some guys fixing kde bugs and asking me or someone
> else
> in the team to check and commit it. So, if they have their quiz I would
> love to help mentoring them and otherwise I would love to see them in IRC
No quizzes yet. When
On Aug 16, 2006, at 4:04 PM, Mike Bonar wrote:
On the plus side it would be much easier to find duplicate bugs
since the titles would be uniform.
I think this is an interesting point. I'd like to have something like
a specialised bug system for ebuilds, where you have to enter the
package
Hi,
is there a group limit for NFS exported file systems in recent kernels?
One if my users cannot access directories that belong to a group he actually
_is_ a member of. That, however, is true only when accessing them over NFS. On
the local file system, everything is fine. UIDs and GIDs are the
On Monday 21 August 2006 14:59, Abhay Kedia wrote:
>
> I use alsaplayer to play KDE sounds as it works well with dmix and I
> can keep aRts disabled. All KDE sounds are ogg files and when I play
> them with mpg321, it just exits without producing any sound. I guess
> the only thing left for me to u
28 matches
Mail list logo
