On 7/17/06, Alastair Tse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 00:49 +0800, Zhang Le wrote:> Some packages don't provide standard "setup.py".> Take a look at the attachment.> This is a new ebuld.I agree with Stefan, just put a symlink in from whatever their distutils
install script is to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MASKINGS:
- ---
media-gfx/gtksee - Mr. Bones requested this be removed; no update since
Nov 2004. Plenty of other image viewers out there, only uses gtk1
package.mask:
# Michael Ster
On Thursday 15 June 2006 20:17, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
>
> I have to agree that I have never understood the need for the distinction
> between herd and team. It does not seem to add anything, I guess some
> people do not like being referred to as a herd may be? It really doesn't
> bother me. I th
On Thursday 13 July 2006 18:53, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:55:57 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | The dev manual is *wrong*.
>
> No, the devmanual reflects what's actually being done, rather than an
> impractical definition that was written years ago that
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Just an update - I've finished most major desktop stuff for x86 without any
> problems. I'm moving onto stuff that's already on the tracker and is fixed in
> testing but not stable. Rather than open and track a ton of new bugs, I'd
> like
> to reopen the original ~arch bugs a
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 00:49 +0800, Zhang Le wrote:
> Some packages don't provide standard "setup.py".
> Take a look at the attachment.
> This is a new ebuld.
I agree with Stefan, just put a symlink in from whatever their distutils
install script is to setup.py in src_unpack(). This seems to be s
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> My argument is that we must not filter -ffast-math or any other dangerous
> cflags. The reason being that people will request more filters for all
> packages that don't work with it. Many users will either ignore or miss the
> warning messages. Filtering the flag basical
On Monday 10 July 2006 15:20, Patrick McLean wrote:
> Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> > This, for me, triggers 3 questions that are gentoo-dev@ material :
> >
> > 1) Should all ebuilds that currently filter --fast-math die on its
> > presence instead of filtering it ?
>
> I don't think we should die on any
Michael Cummings wrote:
> I'm happy to announce a new addition to the perl team
Welcome! Perl, huh? :P
http://fastar.detonate.net/ftp/images/matrixse/18/6.jpg
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 04:32, Ryan Hill wrote:
> If yes, why ? And what is your better idea ?
>
> I prefer a filter-flags with a ewarn (or elog, haven't read that thread yet
> ;)) message.
>
> * The -ffast-math option is known to break this package and has been
> filtered from your CFLAGS. Link
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Cummings wrote:
> I'm happy to announce a new addition to the perl team (no, not that kind
> of addition - Dr. says that's in September folks;). You may know him
> from such bugzilla favorites as "libeperl dies on `awk`" and
> "libwww-perl has
On Monday 10 July 2006 01:51, Ryan Hill wrote:
> No, that would be a major pain in the ass for anyone wanting to use
> -fast-math, which does have legitimate uses.
>
I want to pose here that -ffast-math has NO LEGITIMATE use as a global CFLAG.
In some apps it doesn't matter as they don't use math.
Alastair Tse wrote:
> I know there's gentoo-bugger, which is great, but it's in perl and I
> couldn't figure out how to modify the output to suit my needs.
yeah gentoo-bugger was interactive, this one is better :)
I really like it, thank you.
> Here's the README attached if you're interested in h
Welcome yuval.
Regards,
Roy bamford
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 20:33 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Alastair Tse wrote:
> > You can get it either via my portage overlay in:
> > http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/dev/liquidx/app-admin/pybugz
> > or as a python distutils compat tarball in
> > http://media.liquidx.net/static/pybugz/pybugz-0.5.tar.gz
Alastair Tse wrote:
> You can get it either via my portage overlay in:
> http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/dev/liquidx/app-admin/pybugz
> or as a python distutils compat tarball in
> http://media.liquidx.net/static/pybugz/pybugz-0.5.tar.gz
Cool! Any reason why not commit it - at least package.masked?
Zhang Le wrote:
> Some packages don't provide standard "setup.py".
> Take a look at the attachment.
> This is a new ebuld.
>
> So my suggestion is to add a new variable to distutils.eclass, e.g.
> SETUP.PY, if it's set, then use it, otherwise let it defaults to
> "setup.py".
what about making a
Welcome, Yuval! :D
--
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
Gentoo Forums Global Moderator
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Some packages don't provide standard "setup.py". Take a look at the attachment.This is a new ebuld.So my suggestion is to add a new variable to distutils.eclass, e.g. SETUP.PY, if it's set, then use it, otherwise let it defaults to "
setup.py".Looking forward to hear your feedback on this.-- Zhang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm happy to announce a new addition to the perl team (no, not that kind
of addition - Dr. says that's in September folks;). You may know him
from such bugzilla favorites as "libeperl dies on `awk`" and
"libwww-perl has incorrect RDEPEND", or under his
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alastair Tse wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As a little weekend project, I wrote a command line interface to
> bugzilla in Python that is targetted to Gentoo's bugzilla (but also
> generalisable to other bugzillas with a little code modification). It
> can do t
Hi All,
As a little weekend project, I wrote a command line interface to
bugzilla in Python that is targetted to Gentoo's bugzilla (but also
generalisable to other bugzillas with a little code modification). It
can do the following:
* search bugzilla and output a table of bugs: bugz search
* lis
(apologies in advance if this goes through twice)
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 12:18 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
>> Should arch testers start working with 4.1.1 then? And do you want bugs to
>> block #117482?
> Arch testers should contact their architecture's leads or Release
>
On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 15:20 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 15 July 2006 13:41, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 17:45 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > > The local root exploit-of-the-week would have been unable to run if our
> > > users systems had /proc mounted with nosuid and/o
Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not 100% sure about the noexec part as that might break upx which
> calls /proc/self/exe as part of it's decompresser routines.
/proc/self/exe is a symlink, and the permissions of symlinks aren't used
for anything. It's less than trivial (and I think impossi
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 12:18 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
>> Should arch testers start working with 4.1.1 then? And do you want bugs to
>> block #117482?
> Arch testers should contact their architecture's leads or Release
> Engineering Architecture Coordinator. As for bug re
On Sunday 16 July 2006 10:07, Josh Saddler wrote:
>Daniel Drake wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The local root exploit-of-the-week would have been unable to run if our
>> users systems had /proc mounted with nosuid and/or noexec
>>
>> It would be worthwhile considering making this a default. What are
>> people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The local root exploit-of-the-week would have been unable to run if our
> users systems had /proc mounted with nosuid and/or noexec
>
> It would be worthwhile considering making this a default. What are
> people's though
28 matches
Mail list logo
