On Tuesday 30 May 2006 23:41, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> Any reason why we can not use the existing 'v4l' use flag for version
> 2 as well? Why repeat the gtk/gtk2 mistake?
Because v4l2 is not available on 2.4 kernel, and if transcode didn't have v4l2
instead of v4l I should have resurrected tr
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:57:19PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
>> Currently we have already 5 applications supporting v4l2 (6 if I split
>> the support in ffmpeg)
>
> Any reason why we can not use the existing 'v4l' use flag for version
> 2 as well? Why repeat the gtk/
While at it: 16 apps w/ firefox local use flag:
local use flags (searching: firefox)
[+ C ] firefox (app-office/openoffice):
Build against Firefox instead of Mozilla
[+ C ] firefox (dev-haskell/gtk2hs):
Build the Mozilla Embeded Comp
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:57:19PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Currently we have already 5 applications supporting v4l2 (6 if I split
> the support in ffmpeg)
Any reason why we can not use the existing 'v4l' use flag for version
2 as well? Why repeat the gtk/gtk2 mistake?
Regards,
Brix
--
Henri
Currently we have already 5 applications supporting v4l2 (6 if I split
the support in ffmpeg)
what about having it global too?
local use flags (searching: v4l2)
[+ C ] v4l2 (dev-libs/DirectFB):
Enables video4linux2 support
[+ C ] v
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am trying to install qemu and kqemu, and I run into a problem:
>
> This is a question for the gentoo-user mailing list.
Didn't you notice, he cross-posted to there as well as personally
emailing me. Not something likely to make an
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 11:16 -0500, Mike Doty wrote:
> Chris has move from various AT projects to a developer. cparrot was
> fist on the amd64 AT project, then he moved on to other arches and
> some
> other hards. It's my great pleasure to have him as a gentoo
> developer.
/me sheds a te
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:06:33PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Hi folks,
> JFYI: I've made an mii-tool single distribution, which is
> independent from the rest of the net-tools stuff.
> http://www.metux.de/articles/oss/mii-tool-1_9_1_1
> This is especially interesting for embedded systems wit
ipkg-utils was maintained by tigger who is no longer a dev. As far as
tigger/solar are aware there is no reason to keep it in the tree. It
will be pmask'd and punted in 30 days at their request.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Mike Doty wrote:
> I am looking forward to working with all of you and getting to know
> you better. Anytime you want to chat about something, please feel
> free to ping me on IRC or drop me an email.
I would like to welcome you to the team too, I remember when you first
joined as an AT and it is
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 11:16 -0500, Mike Doty wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> All-
>
> Chris has move from various AT projects to a developer. cparrot was
> fist on the amd64 AT project, then he moved on to other arches and some
> other hards. It's my great pleasure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All-
Chris has move from various AT projects to a developer. cparrot was
fist on the amd64 AT project, then he moved on to other arches and some
other hards. It's my great pleasure to have him as a gentoo developer.
In his own words:
Greetings!
My
Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install qemu and kqemu, and I run into a problem:
This is a question for the gentoo-user mailing list.
--
Andrew Gaffneyhttp://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/
Gentoo Linux Developer Instal
Hi,
I am trying to install qemu and kqemu, and I run into a problem:
localhost ~ # emerge qemu kqemu
Calculating dependencies... done!
>>> Emerging (1 of 33) x11-proto/xextproto-7.0.2 to /
>>> Downloading
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/individual/proto/xextproto-
7.0.2.tar.bz2
--01:34:16--
Mark Loeser wrote:
> Basically, it would be something that allowed you to "browse" the current
> tree of submitted ebuilds. This way users that submit something can
> categorize it for devs to easily look for ebuilds they may be interested
> in, and we can make it so we could easily grab the ebuild
CHTEKK does this one, thanks.
> Hi Gang,
>
> net-www/awstats is masked because it has open security issues (including
> remote code execution), see bug #130487 for details. Version 6.6 was
> made to fix it, but unfortunately this version is not working at all
> (see bug #134296), so we are trapp
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 14:05 +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 13:06 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > JFYI: I've made an mii-tool single distribution, which is
> > independent from the rest of the net-tools stuff.
> >
> > http://www.metux.de/articles/oss/mii-t
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 12:12, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My new IM (Jabber) adress is : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> My new email is : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So now the whole world knows the email adresses of your contacts. They'll
certainly be happy about that.
Paul
--
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Develope
On Monday 29 May 2006 23:29, Mike Kelly wrote:
> In particular, I know that at one point there was a push for the user
> info files to be XML
not really, it was just an idea i had at the time ... ive been over it a few
times since with the portage guys and it makes no real sense to do it in xml
Hi folks,
JFYI: I've made an mii-tool single distribution, which is
independent from the rest of the net-tools stuff.
http://www.metux.de/articles/oss/mii-tool-1_9_1_1
This is especially interesting for embedded systems with plenty
of space.
cu
--
--
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Could we establish policies for closing them or leaving them to sit
> open?
>
> - Upstream dead, previously submitted URLs no longer functional (yes,
> there are actually some like this!).
> - No ebuild included.
> - Upstream says obsolete in favour of another package.
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 07:30:25PM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> So we created this awesome alias to put ebuilds that need a maintainer.
> Good idea at the time, decent idea still. The problem? We have nearly
> 2000 open bugs assigned to maintainer-wanted[1]. I would like to
> discuss policy on t
Hi,
My new IM (Jabber) adress is : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My new email is : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beber
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 30/05/06, Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Basically, it would be something that allowed you to "browse" the current
tree of submitted ebuilds. This way users that submit something can
categorize it for devs to easily look for ebuilds they may be interested
in, and we can make it so we c
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:14:01AM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> Am Dienstag, 30. Mai 2006 05:29 schrieb Mike Kelly:
> > I'm Mike Kelly, one of the SoC-ers. I'll be working on GLEP 27 for
> > the summer. Right now I'm looking for some basic feedback on my
> > proposal.
> >
> > In p
Alec Warner wrote:
> So we created this awesome alias to put ebuilds that need a maintainer.
> Good idea at the time, decent idea still. The problem? We have nearly
> 2000 open bugs assigned to maintainer-wanted[1]. I would like to
> discuss policy on these. Do we keep them, do we get a group
Hello Mike,
Am Dienstag, 30. Mai 2006 05:29 schrieb Mike Kelly:
> I'm Mike Kelly, one of the SoC-ers. I'll be working on GLEP 27 for
> the summer. Right now I'm looking for some basic feedback on my
> proposal.
>
> In particular, I know that at one point there was a push for the user
> info files
27 matches
Mail list logo
