Philip Webb wrote:
>It is debatable whether users whose systems are already working properly
>should be expected to read sections of the Handbook
>merely in order to accommodate a newly-introduced form of configuration
>or whether some brief note in the emerge output or in GWN
>would be a better w
060401 Roy Marples wrote:
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=4&chap=1#doc_chap1
-- useful advice snipped --
Thanks for the pointers: I will look into configuring ADSL that way.
It is debatable whether users whose systems are already working properly
should be expected
On Saturday 01 April 2006 02:56, Philip Webb wrote:
> 060331 Jakub Moc wrote:
> > Sven Köhler wrote:
> >> I don't when the init.d-script disappeared from the ebuilds:
> >> i still used it and didn't know about the baselayout-support for pppoe.
> >
> > May I suggest reading the fine handbook?
> > ht
>> May I suggest reading the fine handbook?
>> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=4&chap=3#doc_chap4
>
> Yes, it's beautiful,
> but it doesn't tell you in which file to enter the lines :
>
> config_eth0=( "adsl" )
> adsl_user_eth0="username"
>
> Where do you put them
On Friday 31 March 2006 20:56, Philip Webb wrote:
> 060331 Jakub Moc wrote:
> > Sven Köhler wrote:
> >> I don't when the init.d-script disappeared from the ebuilds:
> >> i still used it and didn't know about the baselayout-support for pppoe.
> >
> > May I suggest reading the fine handbook?
> > http
060331 Jakub Moc wrote:
> Sven Köhler wrote:
>> I don't when the init.d-script disappeared from the ebuilds:
>> i still used it and didn't know about the baselayout-support for pppoe.
> May I suggest reading the fine handbook?
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=4&chap=3#d
On Friday 31 March 2006 18:15, Sven Köhler wrote:
> >> I don't when the init.d-script disappeared from the ebuilds, but well: i
> >> still used it and didn't know about the baselayout-support for pppoe.
> >
> > May I suggest reading the fine handbook?
> > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handb
>> I don't when the init.d-script disappeared from the ebuilds, but well: i
>> still used it and didn't know about the baselayout-support for pppoe.
>
> May I suggest reading the fine handbook?
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=4&chap=3#doc_chap4
RTFM - that's always a
Sven Köhler wrote:
> I don't when the init.d-script disappeared from the ebuilds, but well: i
> still used it and didn't know about the baselayout-support for pppoe.
May I suggest reading the fine handbook?
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=4&chap=3#doc_chap4
--
jaku
> how ca i make sure that i am informed earlier about such changes?
While you wee emerging rp-pppe, there was a message on the screen that
informed your about that.
But it didn't inform you, that there is no new /etc/init.d-script
anymore, any your know have to use /etc/conf.d/net.
I don't when
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>On 3/31/06, Jürgen Schinker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>how ca i make sure that i am informed earlier about such changes?
>>
>>
>>
>when has it been renamed exactly, any specific versions?
>
>
Upstream changed that in version 3.6. There is a warning about the
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 13:26 +0200, Jürgen Schinker wrote:
> how ca i make sure that i am informed earlier about such changes?
Hi Juergen,
I haven't seen this myself yet, searching on bugs.gentoo.org hasn't
shown me any known bugs.
I assume you are talking about the net-dialup/rp-pppoe package - s
On 3/31/06, Jürgen Schinker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> how ca i make sure that i am informed earlier about such changes?
>
when has it been renamed exactly, any specific versions?
For rp-pppoe I can tell you that it has been deprecated in favour of
ppp doing the same job.
Have a look at /etc/c
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 10:24 +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 09:16:17AM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> > Hi Aron,
> >
> > On 3/30/06, Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I think we might be best to try three revision control systems to
> > > start: darcs, git an
how ca i make sure that i am informed earlier about such changes?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 09:16:17AM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> Hi Aron,
>
> On 3/30/06, Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think we might be best to try three revision control systems to
> > start: darcs, git and subversion. Three seems like a lot, but each
> > has its reason, and w
Hi Aron,
On 3/30/06, Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we might be best to try three revision control systems to
> start: darcs, git and subversion. Three seems like a lot, but each
> has its reason, and we can anticipate darcs being used primarily by
> the haskell team rather tha
Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote:
> Something interresting has happend since last, the new bugday site has
> gone into official beta, and can been seen on
> http://bugday.gentoo.org/bugdaytest . Please do some testing with it,
> and report any bugs you find back to me.
Bug #1:
Do *NOT* ask for Bugzil
18 matches
Mail list logo
