On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 06:23:55AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:50:47 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Drop the magic-chicken crap (especially in light of your comments
> | about 'professional' news inline in the glep).
>
> Eh, there aren't any magic
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:50:47 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Drop the magic-chicken crap (especially in light of your comments
| about 'professional' news inline in the glep).
Eh, there aren't any magic chickens in the glep.
| Not really. Just requires your code to be space saf
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 04:15:45AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Here we go again... Changes:
>
> * We're now supporting overlays, multiple repositories and magic flying
> chickens. To do this, we're shoving a whole load of new requirements
> onto Portage. Said requirements are documented under
On Saturday 17 December 2005 20:57, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 20:50:43 -0800 John Myers
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | GLEP 42 wrote:
> | > * Before an ``emerge --ask `` sequence
> |
> | What, exactly, does this mean? I'm guessing it means between the
> | package list and the
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 20:50:43 -0800 John Myers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| GLEP 42 wrote:
| > * Before an ``emerge --ask `` sequence
| What, exactly, does this mean? I'm guessing it means between the
| package list and the prompt, but it's not quite clear.
I dunno, I refuse to use emerge --ask for
Not that my lowly user opinion matters, but I agree with ciaranm that
repository IDs should not be allowed to contain spaces
GLEP 42 wrote:
> * Before an ``emerge --ask `` sequence
What, exactly, does this mean? I'm guessing it means between the package list
and the prompt, but it's not quite cl
I agree with ciaranm (did I really just say that?) that repository IDs should
not be allowed to contain spaces.
--
Andrew Gaffneyhttp://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/
Gentoo Linux Developer Installer Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailin
I agree with ciaranm that repository IDs should not be allowed to
contain spaces. Seriously.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Here we go again... Changes:
* We're now supporting overlays, multiple repositories and magic flying
chickens. To do this, we're shoving a whole load of new requirements
onto Portage. Said requirements are documented under `Required Portage
Enhancements`_. I now expect to get heavily flamed by a d
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 06:20:33PM -0500, David Thomas wrote:
> Here is a fix for libXt, similar to the problems I had with libX11
> last week. I don't see an obvious way to patch the Makefile.am.
> Please send comments.
yeah, no good ... you need to add logic for a CC_FOR_BUILD which would
then
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:08:31AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:01:59 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Do you need to know how every bit of a car works to drive it? No.
>
> No, but I do need to know whether it has manual or automatic gears, and
> wher
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:07:27AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:51:05 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Transitioning from single news.unread to N is going to break clients
> | that expect a single.
>
> Yup.
>
> | As I said, you're going to break stuf
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:01:59 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Do you need to know how every bit of a car works to drive it? No.
No, but I do need to know whether it has manual or automatic gears, and
where the steering wheel is.
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:51:05 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Transitioning from single news.unread to N is going to break clients
| that expect a single.
Yup.
| As I said, you're going to break stuff- and you're building it into
| your glep out of (aparent) stubborness.
No no.
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 12:24:48AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:14:15 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | What remaining straw men are there for ignoring the portage
> | developers requests?
>
> Asking you to specify how multiple repositories will work b
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 12:14:30AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:33:18 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:54:06PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | > Well, if Portage ever gets multiple repository support, then news
> | > clients c
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:14:15 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| What remaining straw men are there for ignoring the portage
| developers requests?
Asking you to specify how multiple repositories will work before I try
to extend the GLEP to support multiple repositories is hardly a s
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 11:25:58PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:15:48 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | True stand alone repository capabilities aren't required/bound to
> | glep42, all that's required out of glep42 is that the syncing repo id
> | be us
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:33:18 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:54:06PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:48:45 -0800 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > wrote:
| > | I wish you'd reconsider, because I was looking forward to multiple
|
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:54:06PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:48:45 -0800 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | I wish you'd reconsider, because I was looking forward to multiple
> | repository support.
>
> Well, if Portage ever gets multiple repository support, the
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:15:48 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| True stand alone repository capabilities aren't required/bound to
| glep42, all that's required out of glep42 is that the syncing repo id
| be used now (even if it may seem superfluous). Iow, news *should*
| work regar
Hey all,
Here is a fix for libXt, similar to the problems I had with libX11
last week. I don't see an obvious way to patch the Makefile.am.
Please send comments.
Symptom:
../util/makestrs -i .. < ../util/string.list > StringDefs.c
/bin/sh: ../util/makestrs: cannot execute binary file
make[2]:
Pardon bluntness; don't mean offense, just specifically picking the
hell out of this proposal to make a point (lucky you) :)
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:17:44AM -0500, Andrew Muraco wrote:
> Attached is a draft of a glep for formalizing multiple-repository support
I appreciate trying to chip in,
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 09:21:45PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:16:04 -0800 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | > Well, that depends... If you have sys-apps/foo installed from the
> | > gentoo-x86 repository, and the breakmygentoo repositor
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:16:04 -0800 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > Well, that depends... If you have sys-apps/foo installed from the
| > gentoo-x86 repository, and the breakmygentoo repository issues a
| > news item about sys-apps/foo, should it be displayed?
|
|
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Well, that depends... If you have sys-apps/foo installed from the
gentoo-x86 repository, and the breakmygentoo repository issues a news
item about sys-apps/foo, should it be displayed?
Well, probably not. Off hand, perhaps portageq could provide a query that
returns som
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 12:38:24 -0800 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Looking into this a little further, it seems that
| Display-If-Installed can be implemented with `portageq match /
| ` and Display-If-Keyword can be implemented with `portageq
| envvar ARCH`. That leaves Display-If-Profile
Zac Medico wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
except that it moves it deeper down into the "how
do I determine whether this news item is relevant?" area. And the only
way to get around that would be to move even more code into Portage
than you're already proposing.
Are the currently specified Disp
When you are interested in sim and willing to fix all bugs¹ and takeover
maintainership) speak now. Christmas morning I'll crucify it.
Carsten
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110241
pgplrITLoIEF7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 02:49:21 -0500 Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 02:55 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115707
| >
| > dev-libs/commonc++ doesn't compile with gcc 3.4, and isn't depended
| > upon by anything. The replacement is
> As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support:
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html
I like it - well done Marius.
--
Daniel Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Crypto/PPC/dev-embedded/Forensics/NetMon
pgpD3JojbdJir.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I apologize for the caps in the subject.
Andrew Muraco
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Attached is a draft of a glep for formalizing multiple-repository support
This is far from ideal in many ways, but i'm too tired and I drank too
much caffine to be sane.
Also, i have no clue how to use docutils so i just tried my best.
(** is my way of doing another level of bullets, please le
33 matches
Mail list logo
