Georgi Georgiev posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on
Sat, 12 Nov 2005 11:27:47 +0900:
> maillog: 11/11/2005-05:48:50(-0700): Duncan types
>> Perhaps $PORTDIR/news, with seen and unseen subdirs (and appropriate
>> no-sync settings on the subdirs)
>
> Remember that $PORTDIR can be share
Hi all,
Now that my job situation has settled down, I have some free time
floating
around, and a bit of finances to cover it. That said, I'd like to see if
there would be interest in a bug wrangling event of some sort taking place in
the SF area. If I get enough interest, I'll go ahe
On Saturday 12 November 2005 07:19, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> When we have emerge --news done,
I keep seeing references to "emerge --news" but at the same time am seeing
that news readers are external. What exactly is `emerge --news` meant to do?
Print out "You've got news!"? Manage some external
Anyone know how safe/unsafe dev-python/setuptools-0.6_alpha5 is? I am building
an ebuild for Turbogears and a current version of setuptools is required.
--
Edward Muller - Interlix
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
417-862-0573
PGP Key: http://interlix.com/Members/edwardam/pgpkeys
pgpGga3qTD25q.pgp
Descriptio
maillog: 11/11/2005-05:48:50(-0700): Duncan types
> Perhaps $PORTDIR/news, with seen and unseen subdirs (and appropriate
> no-sync settings on the subdirs)
Remember that $PORTDIR can be shared between machines. That's why
"world" is kept in /var/lib/portage.
--
\Georgi Georgiev \ Ignoranc
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 17:30 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> The November Gentoo Council meeting will be held on #gentoo-council next
> week, Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC, presided by Seemant Kulleen.
>
> The deadline for submitting items for the meeting agenda is set to
> Sunday, November 13th
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 18:22 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> It seems to be your own quest to have the news *only*
> delivered by portage.
I thought I'd been very clear in the email that you've replied to that I
support making the news available via other ways. It's the timing that
I'm a bit wo
Grant Goodyear posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
excerpted below, on Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:09:58 -0600:
> I was going to say that the only way new news items could appear is
> during an emerge --sync, but of course that's not true for people who
> either add an overlay or use CVS. I'd be comfortable wit
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 16:36 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:12:43AM -0500, solar wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 14:38 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 01:11:24PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
> > > > Obviously if this is going to be ap
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 22:37 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> > Things that should definitely be changed:
> > - Integration with existing systems:
> > This definitely should be a requirement for the GLEP to be considered
> > final. It doesn't prevent some thing being implemented sooner than
> > others
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 22:37:15 + Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| For example, there's no real reason why GLSA's couldn't been delivered
| via this at some point (although I'd prefer a "You have X amount of
| security fixes to apply" type message adding to emerge, and treating
| GLSAs
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 18:40 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> I've already asked a similar question in another mail (in other
> context) without an answer, but how many news items do people believe
> will exist at any given time?
We won't know for certain until people start using it. I expect that
i
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 10:03 +0100, Grobian wrote:
> Ok, you want a reaction, because you are Feeling Blue[1], right.
The only reaction I want is for us to meet the goals that I have set
out, instead of trying to move those goals.
> You describe here (and in your diary) the aim to reach 100% of ou
Marius Mauch wrote: [Fri Nov 11 2005, 11:40:53AM CST]
> Things that I'd like to be changed/I'm not completely sure about:
> - filtering of news items:
> I've already asked a similar question in another mail (in other
> context) without an answer, but how many news items do people believe
> will e
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:40:53 +0100 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| I've already asked a similar question in another mail (in other
| context) without an answer, but how many news items do people believe
| will exist at any given time? Depending on the actual implementation
| it might be
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 00:58:14 +
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Feedback from people who have something useful to say would be very
> much welcomed, assuming of course that they've read the GLEP.
Things that I think are generally ok as is:
- news item format
- news item distributio
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 10:38 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:19:15 +0100
> Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 10-11-2005 21:33:48 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> > > We need to establish *one* authoritative source of news. We can't
> > > do that if we simultaneously lau
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 04:52 +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:07:37 -0800 Mike Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | What about something like "/etc/portage/news.read", which contains a
> > | single news file per line. Perhaps have support for something
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 21:33 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> My personal conclusion was that there is only one place where we can
> have any degree of certainty that we have the attention of 100% of the
> userbase - or as near as damn it. I believe that place is right beneath
> the message that tell
On Monday 07 November 2005 22:56, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Ok, this is a change to the GLEP process, so it itself needs to be a
> GLEP... All it does is propose that GLEPs be allowed to stick example
> code in a subdirectory rather than having to inline things or shove
> them off on someone's devsp
On Friday 11 November 2005 00:35, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:12:28 + Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | Should the GLEP explain how Portage will know how many unread news
> | items there are in /var/lib/gentoo/news? I couldn't spot where this
> | is covered
Benno Schulenberg posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
excerpted below, on Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:28:17 +0100:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> Next draft will propose being able to append .read to a filename
>> to mark it read without deleting it.
>
> But don't use ".read", as it can be understood as both prese
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 10:03 +0100, Grobian wrote:
> On 10-11-2005 20:55:37 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
>
> I am just in the opinion that we lack a system where users can find the
> information they need. That would help a certain type of users,
> absolutely not all of them. So yes, after that,
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Next draft will propose being able to append .read to a filename
> to mark it read without deleting it.
But don't use ".read", as it can be understood as both present tense
(imperative) and past tense. Better use something like ".seen".
Benno
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org m
On 11-11-2005 10:38:43 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> No, the central repository certainly shouldn't be on the web (whatever
> that means in the first place), it has to be somewhere in CVS
> (easily accessible by all devs, though not necessarily in a direct way)
> and should be replicated to as many
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:19:15 +0100
Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10-11-2005 21:33:48 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> > We need to establish *one* authoritative source of news. We can't
> > do that if we simultaneously launch several sources of news all at
> > once. We have to launch *one
On 10-11-2005 21:33:48 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> We need to establish *one* authoritative source of news. We can't do
> that if we simultaneously launch several sources of news all at once.
> We have to launch *one* service first, give the userbase time to adjust
> to that, and then start mak
On 10-11-2005 20:55:37 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
Ok, you want a reaction, because you are Feeling Blue[1], right.
> On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 20:11 +0100, Grobian wrote:
> > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > That's your first misconception right there. Most users don't sign up
> > > for things.
> >
>
28 matches
Mail list logo
