[gentoo-dev] 2 new victims...err..devs:)

2005-07-25 Thread Deedra Waters
Hi all, I have two new devs to introduce tonight... I meant to send this out sooner, sorry. Jan Kundrát (jkt) has come to join Gentoo to assist in documentation translation. (This is jkt's first open source project) I'm from Czech Republic, country in the middle of old Europe, and I'm trying t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: app-portage/genlop: 9 open bugs, dead upstream

2005-07-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 25 July 2005 09:28 am, Graham Murray wrote: > Michael Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The funny thing about no more activity upstream is this: why would > > there be? Except for bug fixes, it does a simple job, and it does it > > damned well: it parses your emerge log and gives y

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Petteri Räty (Betelgeuse)

2005-07-25 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 20:26 +0300, Flammie Pirinen wrote: > Ooh, goodie. That's almost enough of us to form a *Finnish conspiration* > then! Dream on ;) > Welcome. Yeah, welcome to the team, Betelgeuse. ./Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile comput

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Petteri Räty (Betelgeuse)

2005-07-25 Thread Flammie Pirinen
Ooh, goodie. That's almost enough of us to form a *Finnish conspiration* then! Welcome. -- Flammie, Gentoo Linux Documentation's Finnish head translator. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] New Developer: Petteri Räty (Betelgeuse)

2005-07-25 Thread Karl Trygve Kalleberg
Hi gang, please give a warm welcome to Petteri Räty, who's come all the way from the far reaches of Finland to be with us here tonight. While not training to be part of the Finnish national duathlon team for arm wrestling and tango, Petteri enjoys quiet walks along the finnish highways and trekki

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal: pre-emerge advisories

2005-07-25 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 25/07/2005-22:33:09(+0900): Jason Stubbs types > On Monday 25 July 2005 22:09, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 20:53 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > > On Monday 25 July 2005 16:51, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > > > Something like this maybe? (Yes, I know using $T will be fr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal: pre-emerge advisories

2005-07-25 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 22:33 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > On Monday 25 July 2005 22:09, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 20:53 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > > On Monday 25 July 2005 16:51, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > > > Something like this maybe? (Yes, I know using $T will be fro

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal: pre-emerge advisories

2005-07-25 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Monday 25 July 2005 22:09, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 20:53 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > On Monday 25 July 2005 16:51, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > > Something like this maybe? (Yes, I know using $T will be frowned upon, > > > but not much else you can do. Also, might use

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: app-portage/genlop: 9 open bugs, dead upstream

2005-07-25 Thread Graham Murray
Michael Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The funny thing about no more activity upstream is this: why would > there be? Except for bug fixes, it does a simple job, and it does it > damned well: it parses your emerge log and gives you just the output > you want and need. Don't abandon a tool

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal: pre-emerge advisories

2005-07-25 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 20:53 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > On Monday 25 July 2005 16:51, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 11:18 -0400, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:53:15AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote: > > > > Georgi Georgiev wrote: > > > > > Just to make sure I am not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: app-portage/genlop: 9 open bugs, dead upstream

2005-07-25 Thread Michael Cummings
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:45:29 +0300 Ivan Yosifov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, Alin. > > This was the type of constructive response I was hoping to provoke. > Don't get me wrong - I like genlop, however software "final state" does > not exist IMO, and bugfixing is hugely important with any

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal: pre-emerge advisories

2005-07-25 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Monday 25 July 2005 16:51, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 11:18 -0400, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:53:15AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote: > > > Georgi Georgiev wrote: > > > > Just to make sure I am not missing something. > > > > > > > > Does this cover the > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: app-portage/genlop: 9 open bugs, dead upstream

2005-07-25 Thread Ivan Yosifov
Thanks, Alin. This was the type of constructive response I was hoping to provoke. Don't get me wrong - I like genlop, however software "final state" does not exist IMO, and bugfixing is hugely important with any software. Also, by "dead upstream" I mean that the page does not even exist anymore,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal: pre-emerge advisories

2005-07-25 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 11:18 -0400, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:53:15AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote: > > Georgi Georgiev wrote: > > > Just to make sure I am not missing something. > > > > > > Does this cover the > > > > > > - If you are upgrading from a version of udev prior to 046 ..

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: app-portage/genlop: 9 open bugs, dead upstream

2005-07-25 Thread Alin Nastac
Michael Cummings wrote: >As the original handler of genlop (it was assigned to perl herd when it >first was asked to be added, since its written in perl) I strongly vote >against dropping the package (ok, I didn't even realize it had been >switched over to the portage-tools group for maintenance,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: app-portage/genlop: 9 open bugs, dead upstream

2005-07-25 Thread Michael Cummings
As the original handler of genlop (it was assigned to perl herd when it first was asked to be added, since its written in perl) I strongly vote against dropping the package (ok, I didn't even realize it had been switched over to the portage-tools group for maintenance, and as such that there were e

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Re: app-portage/genlop: 9 open bugs, dead upstream

2005-07-25 Thread Jakub Moc
25.7.2005, 10:41:09, Ivan Yosifov wrote: > If we all like it that much, perhaps someone will want to take over it, make > a homepage ( or just set www.gentoo.org as the homepage ) and go through the > open bugs. > If not - it can be either dropped or left as it is currently. If no one > cares ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: app-portage/genlop: 9 open bugs, dead upstream

2005-07-25 Thread Ivan Yosifov
Well, this is the problem. I like it too, and I too don't like the current stituation. Currently genlop is abandonware. There is no activity in Bugzilla, so that's why I post to gentoo-dev. Portage Utilities Team, Hello ? If we all like it that much, perhaps someone will want to take over it, ma