Re: Podling release without IPMC vote

2024-09-10 Thread rdb...@gmail.com
+1 to modifying the download page. Would it also make sense for an IPMC member to remove the source artifacts? On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 9:35 AM PJ Fanning wrote: > Can we remove the download links for the 0.1.0 release until the IPMC > vote passes? > https://xtable.apache.org/releases/downloads/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.1.0-incubating

2024-09-11 Thread rdb...@gmail.com
-1 (binding) I did a quick build and saw that the xtable-utilities Jar has dependencies bundled in, but doesn't have a LICENSE or NOTICE that reflects those dependenci

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.1.0-incubating

2024-09-11 Thread rdb...@gmail.com
gt; release? > > On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 21:06, rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > -1 (binding) > > > > I did a quick build and saw that the xtable-utilities Jar > > < > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/xtable/xtable-utilities/0.1.0-incubating/xtab

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.1.0-incubating

2024-09-11 Thread rdb...@gmail.com
released the jars > without having an IPMC vote. I think it is nigh on impossible to get > jars removed from Maven Central once they are released. > > On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 21:20, rdb...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > I thought that the purpose of the disclaimer was (at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.1.0-incubating

2024-09-12 Thread rdb...@gmail.com
Good point Justin about the importance of checking for problematic licenses. That fat jar is 600Mb and includes the kitchen sink in terms of classes. One set of classes is from OpenJDK JOL and this is GPL-2.0 licensed. This seems like a big problem to me, especially because the artifact has alrea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.2.0-incubating, release candidate #2

2024-11-12 Thread rdb...@gmail.com
or your vote rdblue. > > > PJ Fanning, there are no binary builds in the current release > artifacts. > > > > > > -Vinish > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 2:57 AM PJ Fanning > wrote: > > > > > > > Would it be possible to provid

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache DataFusion sqlparser-rs

2024-09-23 Thread rdb...@gmail.com
+1 On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 11:11 AM tison wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Good luck :D > > Best, > tison. > > Andy Grove 于2024年9月24日周二 01:33写道: > > > > Apache DataFusion is receiving a donation of sqlparser-rs [1], a SQL > parser > > implemented in Rust. > > > > Please vote to approve this contributi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XTable (Incubating) 0.2.0-incubating, release candidate #2

2024-11-08 Thread rdb...@gmail.com
+1 (binding) Checked for instances of undocumented code copied from other sources, ran RAT tool, validated signature and checksum. Thanks for fixing the licensing issues! It also looks like there's good progress on the shaded Jar's licensing as well. On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 9:21 AM Jesus Camacho

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris (incubating) 0.9.0-rc6

2025-02-21 Thread rdb...@gmail.com
Carrying over my +1 from the dev list. Because there is no intent to publish convenience binaries, I don't think there are requirements for the Jars that are produced. If that understanding is incorrect, please let me know and I'll start checking the Jars even if they aren't going to be published.