On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> To be slightly more specific, we cleared it with the _legal team_ for
> the .NET foundation (who runs the project that Roman spotted), not
> just some engineers.
Great! I just wanted to capture a bit of serendipitous discovery on my part
and m
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Good point, Roman -- I don't think there's one right answer there.
>> Copyright credits in open source works with lots of collaborators are
>> a can of worms.
>
>> Maybe add a short header to each file (vet wording with
>> legal-dis
recommend either testing them, or
> putting in behavior so that it doesn't actually change files in the
> default command line (to prevent surprises, if it doesn't work as
> someone anticipated).
>
> - Shane
>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:14 PM Roman Sha
Henri, it seems I'm a bit lost with your terminology. See the question bellow:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Haven't done this in a while :)
>
> Thought I'd share that the following podlings have not yet signed off on
> their Copyright sections in their status reports.
eader content should be. This is the only
> outstanding item. Once it has been resolved we will be putting up a RC2
> and calling for another vote by the Incubator PMC.
>
> Regards,
> Frank
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>
>&
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Frank McQuillan wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> Based on comments from the PMC regarding MADlib release candidate
> v1.9alpha-rc1
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201603.mbox/%3CCA%2BULb%2Bts1B5r2BGVMj5N0tX0ugKjDqKJ3xjkTAqoGwVm%3D9knnA
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:11 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 7 March 2016 at 01:46, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> To close a loop on this: based on the consensus I created a public
>> version of the tools under:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev/tools/licensing/
>>
>&
gt; In fact no dates appear in this particular incubator, so I guess it's
> just not updated. Some email archive digging might be required to find
> the right dates..
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/datafu.xml
> is the file to upd
CCing Greg directly since he dealt with this for SVN
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Frank McQuillan wrote on 3/14/16 6:49 PM:
>> Good day,
>>
>> We have moved the Apache MADlib (incubating) web site to ASF infra at
>> http://madlib.incubator.apache.org/
>>
>> However ther
anqiao Zhu
* Zuyu Zhang
* Marc Spehlmann
* Saket Saurabh
* Hakan Memisoglu
* Harshad Deshmukh
* Adalbert Gerald Soosai Raj
* Udip Pant
* Siddharth Suresh
* Rathijit Sen
* Qiang Zeng
* Shoban Chandrabose
* Navneet Potti
* Yinan Li
* Sangmin Shin
* James Paton
* Shixuan Fan
* Roman Shapos
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> If you want to simplify policy, get rid of the champion.
> Or rather, reduce the champion’s role to nominating a project for incubation.
> Once the project has entered incubation, the champion’s role ends.
+1000 to the above. With all of my ex
ignesh M. Patel
* Harshad Deshmukh
* Jianqiao Zhu
* Zuyu Zhang
* Marc Spehlmann
* Saket Saurabh
* Hakan Memisoglu
* Rogers Jeffrey Leo John
* Adalbert Gerald Soosai Raj
* Udip Pant
* Siddharth Suresh
* Rathijit Sen
* Craig Chasseur
* Qiang Zeng
* Shoban Chandrabose
* Navneet Potti
* Yinan
Ted,
seems like INFRA is deferring back to you:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11540
Would appreciate you doing it soon.
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For add
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal
> and the feedback so far seems to be positive.
>
> Please vote to accept Quickstep into
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:44 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> We're currently at 54 podlings in the incubator. I feel like that's a
> lot. Anyone else have any concerns with so many podlings?
I really encourage everybody to read the feedback on the last year's attempt
at changing the Incubat
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal
> and the feedback so far seems to be positive.
>
> Please vote to accept Quickstep into
+1 from my side. Small projects are ok.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> ++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Chief Architect
> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
> NAS
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Frank McQuillan wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> Thank you in advance for reviewing MADlib v1.9-rc1.
>
> This is the 2nd ASF release for Apache MADlib (incubating). The goal of
> this 2nd release is: general availability of MADlib v1.9 for community use.
>
> The
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> I agree. I think this project has been dead for a while, and we’re just
> prolonging the agony.
As an initial Champion (but NOT a mentor) I have to agree :-(
> If we were to wind up the project, how would we proceed? A vote on
> concerted's
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Mark Struberg
wrote:
> We again got a few contributions in the last days, so I really think we will
> do fine and add committers soon.
FWIW: I'm honestly very relaxed about the # of committers. All the project
has to have is an active PMC of at least 3. That's th
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> The strict limit is 3. The practical limit is probably more like 5.
Like I said: FWIW I see no problem with a project with a PMC count of
3 active members. We have board reports for a reason (should that active
bit ever become a problem).
Than
Hi!
with less than a month to go before we all
get to Vancouver for ApacheCON CORE 2016
I'd like to announce that Podling Shark Tank
will be there as well for your viewing pleasure
and rotten fruit casting!
What is Podling Shark Tank I hear you asking?
It is as though Lightning Talks and US TV
sh
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 2:01 AM, moon soo Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apache Zeppelin started incubating about a year and 4 months ago
> (2014-12-23) and the members of the community think that it is ready to
> graduate from the incubator to be a TLP.
>
> Since it's inception, Zeppelin community has made
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> In the Quickstep proposal, Roman explicitly listed himself as both Champion
> and Mentor.
> I think that is a good model to follow. If someone lists themselves only as
> Champion would
> I assume that their responsibilities end shortly after
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:55 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> I can't speak with 100% certainty, but it sounds like an SGA would be
> expected prior to importing into an ASF repo.
That's the usual protocol.
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubs
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> Following a discussion[1], the Concerted community has voted to retire the
> project from incubation[2]. Per the retirement guide[3], the next step is an
> IPMC vote for retirement.
>
> This is a vote of the IPMC to confirm the decision to reti
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> This is a call for a vote on the Apache Geode (incubating) release
> 1.0.0-incubating.M2.
>
> This release candidate, 1.0.0-incubating.M2.RC2, has successfully passed a
> vote for a release
> on the geode developer maili
ke to add myself and Mohit to the list to pitch Myriad
>
> -Adam-
> me@
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I apologize for the wide distribution, but since my email to general@
>> didn't seem to have reached all o
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:05 PM, DO YUNG YOON wrote:
> Roam, Can you please also add me. DoyungYoon.
> I would like to add Apache S2Graph (incubating) to the list. Thanks.
Done!
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general
a2016.sched.org/event/6M1u/lightning-talks
If your polding happens to be in Big Data space and you
can present on Tue, please email me ASAP so I can make
sure that both days can comfortably fit all the speakers.
The format will remain the same!
Thanks,
Roman.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:27 PM,
participating in
>> conferences and we are presenting in Apache Con, Strata + Hadoop World.
>>
>> Date of last release:
>>
>> 2016-03-28
>>
>> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
>>
>> NIL
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
&g
Hi!
The Podlings Shark Tank presentations are going to happen
today at ApacheCON:
May 12 • 4:40pm - 5:30pm:
https://s.apache.org/acna2016_shark_tank
If you're attending ApacheCON -- consider joining us!
We've got a great line up of speakers:
Mohit Soni (Myriad)
Jean-Baptiste Onofré (B
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
> Since discussion has died down, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting
> Fluo into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Proposal: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FluoProposal
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Fluo into the Apache Incubator
> [ ] +0 Abstain.
> [ ]
To answer back into the original thread (based on the question about
Phonebook last week):
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 6:51 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> Due to some changes in recent times around the ASF, I think I've identified
> a new setup step for podlings.
>
> I'd like to recommend adding
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> My reaction (being ignorant of the machinery behind phonebook and
> authorization)
> is that adding to asf-authorization-template on podling creation would be ok
> (since it
> is done only once per podling, by a mentor who presumably knows wh
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 4:38 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 6:29 PM Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>> > My reaction (being ignorant of the machinery behind phonebook and
>> authorizati
Super excited to see this proposal! This will finally allow us to have
an ASF managed
backend for next generation data-driven apps that I see emerging quite rapidly.
The proposal looks great to me (although I'd recommend calling Scala
as an implementation
language more prominently since it may att
Welcome to the club Daniel!
And if you're looking for advice on how to help the most: personally
I consider reviewing podling releases the most fruitful area.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 6:18 PM, wrote:
> Hi, all;
> I've been having a lot of great F2F talks the past few days at the
Daniel,
what are your expectations for the Champion? IPMC has recently
discussed doing away with the role altogether since it doesn't seem
to add any value on top of active mentors. Whether that happens
or not, I'm still surprised you're specifically seeking out a champion.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Thu
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> I definitely have concerns about too many folks becoming initial committers
> and bringing their own corporate agendas to this project.
>
> I suggest that first we vote PIO into incubator then bring in those less
> experienced with the projec
g incubation.
>>
>> It's totally fine with me if we stick to that list. I am just trying to
>> facilitate the fairest process possible.
>>
>>
>> On Friday, May 20, 2016, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:16 P
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>> Hi Luke,
>>
>> I fully agree with you. The committers are already involved to clean-up the
>> repo (PRs have been created).
>>
>> IMHO, this step is decoupled from the pro
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Since discussion on the matter of PredictionIO has died down, I would like
> to call a VOTE
> on accepting PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PredictionIO
>
> [ ] +1 Accept PredictionIO in
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on
> accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato.
>
> This vote will run for the usual 72 hours.
An enthusiastic +1
Roman.
---
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> I respectfully disagree... One of the main reasons we went from 1 to 3
> recommended mentors, way back in the days, was that those 3 would be the
> primary people to ping for binding votes, without limiting the rest of the
> IPMC to do so.
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:05 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> I can agree that there's an issue with the overall number of podlings
> around. However, I don't agree with telling a podling that the IPMC isn't
> going to look at your vote and that your mentors should do that.
Well, a quick recap of the
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Sterling Hughes wrote:
>> I just want to clarify here on the thread —- while I think in general there
>> may be problems with too many podlings/inactive mentors, that is not an
>> issue we often face.
>
> J
Changing private -> dev.
Correct. But credit needs to be given where credit is due. I'm actually
in the middle of a very similar discussion here at AMPlab with Spark
folks. Now that they acknowledged that all ongoing contributions should
be credited according to the Apache Way, they are asking a f
Please stop putting a public mailing list on the same To: line as a
private one. This is a pretty dangerous habit.
I'll replace private@madlib with dev@madlib. Please reply to that part
of the thread.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Looking at:
>
> htt
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> (Off-topic) At some point we may need to discuss our incubation capacity...
> People present cool proposal and they get vote just because that, without
> checking our available resources.
FWIW: I'm still a big fan of having a cap on the #
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> FWIW: I'm still a big fan of having a cap on the # of podlings a single
>> mentor
>> could have
>
> I have a self imposed cap and I’m currently at capacity so sorry can’t help
> out.
Yup. Make two of us!
Thanks,
Roman.
-
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> If each graduating podling provided 2 or 3 mentors (or one person prepared to
> mentor 2 or 3 projects)
> the problem would be solved. It would be a (virtuous) pyramid scheme and the
> incubator could grow indefinitely.
Good point. At least
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Stack wrote:
> We'd like to solicit feedback on whether the Trafodiion project is ready to
> go TLP. I am the project Champion writing on behalf of the project PMC.
>
> Our clutch report is nice and healthy [2]. Our up-to-date status page can
> be found here [1.]. D
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:05 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Dave,
>
> For some reason, I feel like I commented on that thread as well, but don't
> see it, so I'm either thinking of something else or its inlined somewhere
> that I didn't see (e.g. the emails back and forth with Pierre).
>
> The questio
Help me understand, why is this a mentor issue and not IPMC one?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Atanu Mishra wrote:
> Response below.
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:05 PM, John D. Ament
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:22 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
>> Is the status page accurate? Only one added committer and no releases while
>> under incubation?
>>
>
> Yes, just one added committer so far.
>
> We've had five releases during incub
Hi!
I remember we used to have a checklist of things published
somewhere, but I can't find it anymore? What I'm talking about
is something along the lines of:
signature and hashes good?
DISCLAIMER is good?
NOTICE is good?
LICENSE is good?
incubatin
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Is this what you're looking for
>
>http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
That's the MPV check list ;-) but I thought we had a much more expanded one
on a wiki some place. It is totally possible, thought, that I'm
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>> Mike,
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:12 PM Mike Jumper wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Gunnar Tapper
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Let me offer up a concrete example since I str
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get
> opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the Incubator logo should be
> included in podling websites.
>
> Take https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrandingAuditJune2
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
>>> Is this what you're looking for
>>>
>>>http://incubator.apache.org/guides/relea
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Sounds just right to me.
>
> I just spend a few minutes going through incubator sites. The number of
> sites that had the incubator logo was definitely less in my cursory
> examination than the number that made it clear that they were incubating
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:42 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:23 PM Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>> > All,
>> >
>> > As a follow up to the current discussions happening
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Kudu has
> approved on the dev list with 12 positive votes (11 PPMC, 1 community (6
> from IPMC members))
>
> Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/kudu.html
> Grad
Hi Justin!
sorry for a belated reply -- I was on a glorious 2.5 vacation with a
total disconnect from
my email/etc (I have to admit I did Tweet a bit, but only when it came
to non-software
related things like politics or beer). And speaking of beer -- we
really owe you a big one.
I hope you're com
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> This is why we're relying a great deal on RAT's exclusion file to mark
>> the files that came from PG even though their license headers could look
>> weir enough.
>
> Would’t be better to fix/add the headers?
For things where we div
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> if you're saying that we need to slap an ALv2 license header on something
>>> like shm.c -- I don't feel comfortable doing that
>
> Perhaps ask yourself why that is? Is it because the
> licensing/copyright/provenance is unclear?
No
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 8/9/16, 1:27 PM, "shaposh...@gmail.com on behalf of Roman Shaposhnik"
> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Justin Mclean
>>wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> This is why
A very good question/point originated as part of the HAWQ podling
release discussion. I'm forking it into a separate thread and CCing
legal-discuss to help clarify this (at least for myself) once and for all.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> AIUI, if it is 3rd party and otherwi
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> If you remember, we had a very similar conversation in the context of
>> Kudu, and I’d like HAWQ to stick to the same path treating unmodified
>> upstream code that Kudu
>> settled on: http://markmail.org/thread/7w7gjmqrzlutx62z
>
>
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Sure, but mu point is: since I'm not comfortable going against the
>> current stated policy
>> on unmodified 3d party:
>>http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party
>
> Why exactly is that against policy?
If you're asking
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> If you're asking why adding ALv2 header is against the letter of the
>> policy, the answer is simple.
>> Quote:
>>"3. Do not add the standard Apache License header to the top of
>> third-party source files.”
>
> In the case when
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> ===
>> Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
>> or more c
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Why? It would be perfectly fine for PG project to include, lets say an MIT
>> source code.
>
> That would be compatible with our license. But what if they included GPL or
> CDDL licensed software?
There's NO WAY that could be the ca
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> To be concrete: up thread was mention of shm.c
>
> I found two shm.c files in the HAWQ repo. It says it came in as part of
> the SGA. I looked in PostGreSQL's repo, but didn't find shm.c in the same
> paths. So where did HAWQ's shm.c come fro
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Why? It would be perfectly fine for PG project to include, lets say an MIT
>>> source code.
>>
>> That would be compatible with our license. But what if they included GPL or
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Roman
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Hi !
>
>
> Despite an effort to reboot the project in april, we weren't successful
> in keeping the existing committers active. At this point, a decision to
> retire the podling was taken, and a vote was don eon the PPMC :
> https://list
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:23 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed a pattern in some the board reports of PMCs who are
> beginning to experience difficulties. In a notable number of cases a
> significant part of the problem is difficulty in producing a release.
> The sorts of phrases I am
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 6:24 PM, William Markito wrote:
> Hello Incubator IPMC,
>
> This is a call for a vote on the Apache Geode (incubating) release
> 1.0.0-incubating.M3.
>
> This release candidate, 1.0.0-incubating.M2.RC7, has successfully passed a
> vote for a release on the Apache Geode devel
(ozawa.tsuyo...@lab.ntt.co.jp)
* Kai Sasaki (sas...@treasure-data.com)
== Affiliations ==
=== Treasure Data ===
* Makoto Yui
* Kai Sasaki
=== NTT ===
* Takeshi Yamamuro
* Tsuyoshi Ozawa Apache Hadoop PMC member
=== Hortonworks ===
* Daniel Dai (ASF member) Apache Pig PMC member
== Sponsors
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Makoto Yui wrote:
> Hi Marvin,
>
> 2016-08-24 1:23 GMT+09:00 Marvin Humphrey :
>> Looking at the Github history, though, it seems that there were pull requests
>> and issues file by others prior to the Mar 16, 2015 relicensing. Were there
>> any contributions made
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Makoto Yui wrote:
>
>> There are 5 individuals, excluding project committers, sent pull requests
>> to the project before moving to ALv2: smly, y-tag, ryukobayashi,
>> spiritloose, and takahi-i.
>
> I assu
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> I wonder if the requirement might be better phrased along the lines of
> "must have releases completed by a total of > 2 release managers".
I really like this criteria and use it extensively with my podlings.
Thanks,
Roman.
-
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:26 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm wondering if the Apache Incubator is full right now?
It seems that this question gets asked about once a year. The consensus
always seems to be that this may not be the right question to ask. It is
sort of like asking whether Ha
First of all, the way apache org is setup on GitHub make me 99% sure
that the only artifacts allowed there would be release ones.
If we agree on that, I see no problem with
apache/incubator-foo
naming of your *released* Docker images.
Note that there was a separate discussion focused on where
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 6:28 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:58 PM Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>
>> First of all, the way apache org is setup on GitHub make me 99% sure
>> that the only artifacts allowed there would be release ones.
>>
>> If w
See my reply to John if you're curious to know my take on both questions.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
> On Aug 28, 2016 5:58 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
>>
>> First of all, the way apache org is setup on GitHub mak
Hi!
It seems that the discussion has converged and I'd like to
make one extra call for volunteering mentors. Please let
me know ASAP since I'd like to get the VOTE going tomorrow.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> on behalf o
===
* Roman Shaposhnik (Pivotal, ASF member, IPMC member) Apache
Bigtop/Incubator PMC member
=== Nominated Mentors ===
* Reynold Xin (Dataricks, ASF member) Apache Spark PMC member
* Markus Weimer (Microsoft, ASF member) Apache REEF PMC member
* Xiangrui Meng (Databricks, ASF member) Apache Spark
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a
> VOTE on accepting Hivemall into the Apache Incubator.
>
> [] +1 Accept Hivemall into the Apache Incubator
> [] +0 Abstain.
> [] -1 Do not accept Hivemall into th
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a
> VOTE on accepting Hivemall into the Apache Incubator.
>
> [] +1 Accept Hivemall into the Apache Incubator
> [] +0 Abstain.
> [] -1 Do not accept Hivemall into th
tters or PMC members elected?
>
> Jim Jagielski was added as a mentor.
>
> Signed-off-by:
>
> [ ](fineract) Ross Gardler
> [ ](fineract) Greg Stein
> [X](fineract) Roman Shaposhnik
> [ ](fineract) Jim Jagielski
>
> Shepherd/Mentor notes:
(rvs) I'll be fol
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Wade Chandler
wrote:
> Do you mean from the stand point of it being a Java based application, or
> that some how
> NetBeans and the Java TCK are related? I don’t think either is an impact on
> NetBeans IMHO;
> not any more than it is for the Eclipse IDE or Intel
t; 2016-09-13 9:23 GMT+09:00 Roman Shaposhnik :
>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a
>>> VOTE on accepting Hivemall into the Apache Incubator.
>>>
>>> [] +1 Accept Hivemal
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Frank McQuillan wrote:
>
> Hello Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache MADlib (incubating) community has voted on and approved the
> proposal to release MADlib v1.9.1-rc2.
>
> The voting result is available at:
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-madlib-de
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Mark Struberg
wrote:
> I tend to agree with Alex' interpretation.
Makes two of us.
> But we don't yet know what is part of the hg repo and what is part of the
> Oracle contribution.
>
> What would happen if someone e.g. did commit some GPL licensed jar to the
>
Hi!
I've recently had an inquiry from a former Sun employee who
used to hack on NetBeans way back when: how was the list
of initial committers determined? Or more importantly, if he
wants to be added to that list up-front would that be OK?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Geertja
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Mark Struberg
> wrote:
>> ...Please note that during the incubation people need to either show that
>> they
>> are eager to engage with the community...
>
> Indeed, but for a well established p
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> Still, the question remain -- for somebody like that, what would be a
>> criteria
>> to be added as a committer after the project enters incubation?
>
>
> Let's stop wa
401 - 500 of 1001 matches
Mail list logo
