ther
>
>RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
>hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>Apache Curator Project:
>
> * Jordan Zimmerman (randgalt)
> * Jay Zarfoss (zarfide)
> * Eric Tschetter (c
r notification about commits
>
> == Subversion Directory ==
>
> Git is the preferred source control system: git://git.apache.org/twill
>
> == Issue Tracking ==
>
> JIRA Twill (TWILL)
>
> == Other Resources ==
>
> The existing code already has unit tests, so we would
13. Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>
> Non-Binding (+1)
>
>1. Alejandro Abdelnur
>2. Edward J. Yoon
>3. Joe Stein
>4. Patrick Hunt
>5. Ashish
>6. Tom White
>7. Andrew Purtell
>8. Bernd Fondermann
>9. Larry Mccay
>10. Seetharam
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Any updates from the mentors?
>
I reviewed/signedoff on the report. I've commented both in public and
in private to the s4 folks that they should consider retirement as an
option. I was/am waiting to see what the community decides.
Patrick
Hi Patrick, prior to any incubator release you should ensure that your
status page is up to date. The "Project Setup" section in particular:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/spark.html
Patrick
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following
hould be updated for 2014
* the release artifact (spark-0.9.0-incubating.tgz) is missing the
DISCLAIMER file, I see that the text is included in the readme, this
is somewhat non-standard but seems fine.
Patrick
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Hi Patrick, prior to any i
The status page is updated and it looks good to me.
+1 Release this package as Apache Spark 0.9.0-incubating
Patrick
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> -1 due to the status page not being up to date. But otw the sig/xsums
> looked good, RAT checked out clean and
-1, the release looks good however the status page needs to be updated
before you publish this (generally, but specifically see the "Project
Setup" section):
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/twill.html
If you're not familiar with the mechanics of this see:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/we
+1
Patrick
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
> (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
> http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
>
> I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make t
terday with dates (both Incubation
> status reports and Project setup section). Is it not update enough?
>
> Thanks,
> Terence
>
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> -1, the release looks good however the status page needs to be updated
>> before you pub
-1. The release artifact seems to be totally wrong to me, I think it
was built incorrectly/accidentally, it certainly wasn't built the same
way as the 1.2.0 release artifact.
Some of the problems:
1) the artifact is 500MB - the previous artifact (1.2.0) was 86k,
unless you added tons of test data
The S4 retirement vote is in progress:
http://markmail.org/message/mkxdu6fnzmsybeq2
Patrick
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I would like to kindly request some assistance
> from the mentors of the following projects: devicemap,
> kalumet, s4, wave and npanday (
ir
>of the Apache Bigtop Project, and to have primary responsibility
>for management of the projects within the scope of
>responsibility of the Apache Bigtop Project; and be it further
>
>RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be a
gt; === Other Resources ===
> The existing code already has unit and integration tests, so we would
> like a Jenkins instance to run them whenever a new patch is submitted.
> This can be added after project creation.
>
> == Initial Committers ==
> * Kishore Gopalakrishna
&
; The existing code already has unit and integration tests, so we would
> like a Jenkins instance to run them whenever a new patch is submitted.
> This can be added after project creation.
>
> == Initial Committers ==
> * Kishore Gopalakrishna
> * Shi Lu
> * Zhen Zheng
> * Ada
+1, sig/xsum validate, code is compiling/installing, I ran through the
release checklist and everything checks out.
Patrick
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> +1 RAT tests pass (as do others), checksums & sigs match.
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Matthias Friedrich w
I second this. Short of the name search these folks are ready to graduate.
Patrick
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the report, Crunch!
>
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Apache Wiki wrote:
>> + The Crunch community has been very active and continues
hub.com/Netflix/curator/wiki
>> * Curator issues at GitHub: https://github.com/Netflix/curator/issues
>> * Curator javadoc at GitHub: http://netflix.github.com/curator/doc/
>>
>> = Initial Source =
>>
>> * git://github.com/Netflix/curator.git
>>
>> == Sour
ation =
>> >
>> > * Curator wiki at GitHub: https://github.com/Netflix/curator/wiki
>> > * Curator issues at GitHub: https://github.com/Netflix/curator/issues
>> > * Curator javadoc at GitHub: http://netflix.github.com/curator/doc/
>> >
>> > = Initi
rged as a higher level ZK client. Surely project like HBase and others
>> that relying on ZK would appreciate simpler client to ZK.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Henry
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb
Apache
organizational structure will be decided upon graduation." Given this
I don't see why we'd artificially constrain things up front as you've
suggested.
Patrick
>
> On 2/26/13 9:40 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hey Pat,
>
>
> On 2/26/13 11:39 AM, "Patrick Hunt" wrote:
>
>>[…snip…]
>>>
>>> Either: (a) define Curator to be its own separate project/community,
>>>with
>>>
uired Resources
>
> Mailing lists
>
> • curator-private (with moderated subscriptions)
> • curator-dev
> • curator-commits
> • curator-user
> GitHub Repositories
>
> http://github.com/apache/curator git://git.apache.org/curator.git
&g
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:59 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 27 March 2013 20:57, Matthieu Morel wrote:
>> On Mar 27, 2013, at 21:00 , sebb wrote:
>>> On 27 March 2013 19:07, Matthieu Morel wrote:
>> gradle/gradlew scripts to not have the ASL header because this is generated
>> code.
>>
>> According to th
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
Hey there, just back from vacation, hopefully Sebb can weigh in but
here's my thinking:
> We have 2 key questions, which I reproduce below:
>
> 1/ about the content of LICENSE and NOTICE, is the following correct?
>
> - in the LICENSE file o
Hi Jordan, re the voting process see:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
Also the other links to "how to release" type pages for other
incubator projects. It will give you insight into the process and
things like templates for emails and
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
> On May 8, 2013, at 1:09 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
>
> Sebb is awesome.
>
+1
Patrick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional comman
+1 (binding) sig/xsum verify. rat runs clean. I've run through the
release checklist and everything seems fine to me.
Patrick
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is the *fifth* release candidate for Apache S4, version 0.6.0
>
> We fixed 2 blocking issues wrt R
n be added after project
> creation.
>
> == Initial Committers ==
>
> * Ali Rizvi (ali.rizvi at oracle.com)
> * Arvind Prabhakar (arvind at apache.org)
> * Brock Noland (brock at apache.org)
> * Chaoyu Tang (ctang at cloudera.com)
> * Daisy Zhou (daisy at wibidat
The existing code already has unit and integration tests so we would like a
> Hudson instance to run them whenever a new patch is submitted. This can be
> added after project creation.
>
> == Initial Committers ==
> * First Last (user at apache dot org)
> * Eric Sammer (esammer a
+1. md5/sha1/gpg all look good. apache-rat:check is clean, and I was
able to stand up a ZK cluster, use it, then destroy.
Patrick
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Andrei Savu wrote:
> +1
>
> I've been able to run the integration tests on both cloud providers
> and I have started a ZooKeeper clus
; continuous stream with contents
>> > > >> > that can have highly-varied format and highly-varied
>> > > >> content. The volume
>> > > >> > and variety of raw log data makes Apache Hadoop's HDFS
>> > > >> file system
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Phillip Rhodes
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:39 PM, arv...@cloudera.com
> wrote:
>
>> As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
>> days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an
>> Apache Incubator pr
tionality of a usable highly-available Flume
>> master.
>> * Performance, usability, and robustness improvements.
>> * Improving the ability to monitor and diagnose problems as data is
>> transported.
>> * Providing a centralized place for contributed connect
have
>> been accepted from outside contributors. Growing a diverse community
>> is the main reason to bring Bigtop to the Apache Incubator.
>>
>> == Core Developers ==
>>
>> The core developers for Bigtop project are:
>> * Andrew Bayer has extensive experti
-1, I found a few issues that need to be cleaned up.
On the plus side the md5 checked out and "ant test" was successful
I then looked through:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
DISCLAIMER is missing (I don't see in readme or release notes either):
http://incuba
tp://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
specifically:
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
an httpd example:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/example-NOTICE.txt
Perhaps some other incubator member would have more insight or a
better description?
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote:
> There are two kind of jar files. One which HCatalog is adding itself
> and others we are
> inheriting from Hive project. Since Hive is TLP and has multiple
> releases I am going to assume
> I need not to worry about any of those jars and so
-1 - the status page for the project is not up to date. In working
through the release checklist I noticed the status page issue:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
On the plus side I checked sha1/md5/asc, built the code, and verified
via RAT, that all looked fine
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:58 PM, tog wrote:
> +1 (don't know if allowed to vote ;-))
Anyone can vote, however only particular votes (ie by ipmc members)
are binding. Thanks!
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
Patrick
>
> On Tue, Aug 2
+1, I checked md5/sha1/asc, built, tested and ran RAT. Everything
looked fine to me.
Patrick
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Andrei Savu wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache Whirr, version 0.6.0-incubating
> and the last release as an incubator project.
>
> It fixes the foll
It's live and looks good. My vote is now +1.
Patrick
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Status page updated, waiting for it to go live.
>
> A.
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
>> -1 - the status page for the project
There are currently only 2 mentors volunteering to help out (Owen and
myself), would be great to have 3+ -- any IPMC members out there that
could help with the mentoring effort?
Regards,
Patrick
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:43 PM,
== Affiliations ==
* Kishore Gopalakrishna, Linkedin
* Flavio Junqueira, Yahoo!
* Matthieu Morel, Yahoo!
* Anish Nair, A9
* Leo Neumeyer, Quantbench
* Bruce Robbins, Yahoo!
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
* Patrick Hunt
=== Nominated Mentors ===
* Patrick Hunt
* Owen O’Malley
* Arun Mur
+1 (binding)
Patrick
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Raffaele P. Guidi
wrote:
> +1 (non binding) great project
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> > It's been a nearly a week sin
This passes, with 16 +1 votes, plenty of them binding, and no -1 votes.
Thanks to all who voted!
We can now get started creating the Apache S4 podling.
Patrick
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> It's been a nearly a week since the S4 proposal was submitted for
>
Thanks for the heads up, I've added him.
Patrick
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:10 AM, sebb wrote:
> Entries in podling s4 not in incubator group: fpj
>
> =>Podling committers missing from incubator group:
>
> modify_unix_group.pl incubator -add=fpj
>
>
Are there any issues with Apache tlps using incubator releases? I've
heard, but cannot find any official documentation, that tlps should not.
Is this really the case? Are there any rules/guidelines for this?
Thanks,
Patrick
-
Doug/Kevan, thanks for the information, appreciated. Have you considered
adding this to the incubator FAQ? Perhaps it's there somewhere, but I
couldn't find any detail on this one way or the other.
Regards,
Patrick
Patrick Hunt wrote:
Are there any issues with Apache tlps using
Tom, I'd be happy to be a committer (or contributor) for Whirr. I'm very
interested to see ZooKeeper supported. Also very interested in
non-production uses (such as testing).
Regards,
Patrick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general
Thanks for driving this release Tom! Congratulations all.
Patrick
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Tom White wrote:
> With 3 binding +1 IPMC votes (Ant Elder, Doug Cutting, and Tom White)
> and no 0 or -1 votes, the vote passes. I'll proceed with the final
> steps of the release.
>
> Thanks to
This is the second incubator release for Apache Whirr, version
0.2.0-incubating.
PPMC release vote thread:
http://markmail.org/message/kdfnohhod6wdrqaz
The issues fixed for 0.2.0-incubating
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1230&styleName=Html&version=12315339
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Minor nit: You didn't include the KEYS file in your src dist, so I had to go
> poking around your SVN to find it. Either include a link to the KEYS in your
> release VOTE email or please include it in your src distro (better!),
> +1 Checksums & sigs are correct. Licensing looks good.
>
> Doug
>
> On 11/10/2010 08:59 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>
>> This is the second incubator release for Apache Whirr, version
>> 0.2.0-incubating.
>>
>> PPMC release vote thread:
>> http://m
Hello, a hand please?
Can someone with the necessary karma please add me to the Incubator
UNIX group so that I can finalize the release/site? I'm the release
manager and commiter on the project.
Thanks,
Patrick
-
To unsubscribe
Sorry, that is I'm trying to finalize the Whirr release. Thanks.
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Hello, a hand please?
>
> Can someone with the necessary karma please add me to the Incubator
> UNIX group so that I can finalize the release/site? I'm
Thanks Joe!
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Done.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Patrick Hunt
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Sat, November 13, 2010 1:17:45 AM
>> Subject: Re: Please add me to the Incuba
I don't see an icla on file for either Prasad or Mingjie. They need to
get those filed before we can create accounts.
Patrick
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Eric Sammer wrote:
> Hey all. Our (Flume) mentors seem to be temporarily unavailable. We just
> finished voting in two new committers (vot
ith him that this is him.
> http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#unlistedclas
>
> Also, according to http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#newcommitter the IPMC
> member is the one get the CLA completed. Is this out of date?
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:01 PM,
-1 you need to add RAT to your pom:
http://incubator.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/plugin-info.html
I ran this and noticed a number of issues around licensing - ie
license headers missing from files. You should clean this up before
releasing.
Patrick
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Roman Shap
et/modules/hadoop/templates/taskcontroller.cfg
>
> bigtop-deploy/puppet/modules/kerberos/templates/krb5.conf
>
> bigtop-deploy/puppet/modules/kerberos/templates/kdc.conf
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Patrick Hunt
+1 (ipmc binding)
verified the checks/sigs, rat looks good and was able to build the ZK
deb pkg successfully.
note: it would be nice if at the end of the "make zookeeper-deb"
(etc...) some indication of success/failure was indicated. Also some
information on what was built and where it was output
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
>> There is a sample NOTICE file linked [1] from ASF Source Header and
>> Copyright Notice Policy [2]
>>
>> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-examplenotice
>> [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
>
> As someon
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
>> Personally I don't believe whirr is in error. Voldemort is under
>> Apache 2.0 license, and as such falls under this:
>> http://www.apache.org/legal/resol
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>
>>> Personally I don't believe whirr is in error. Voldemort is under
>>> Apache 2.0
al committee...
>
> Cheers
> Niclas
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>>
>>>> Personally I don't believe whir
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Dec 5, 2011, at 9:45 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>
>>> Personally I don't believe whirr is in error. Voldemort is under
>>> Apac
I've opened a couple LEGAL jiras on this stuff to nail it down:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-118
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-119
Thanks all!
Patrick
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Kevan Mille
Thanks Kevan.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Dec 6, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
>> Here's another one, say Apache TLP A includes works from Apache TLP B,
>> is this (B) a "third-party" work or not? Are the "parti
-1, I'm afraid there are still licensing issues, the following three
files are not correctly licensed:
./bin/flume-env.sh.template
./conf/log4j.properties
./flume-ng-core/src/main/avro/flume.avdl
a nit but I'd encourage you to publish the files for a particular
release vote into it's own director
+1 sig/xsum match up, tested clean and RAT reports fine.
It's a bit odd to me that there are two source release artifacts here
(one archived with tar/gz the other with zip), I've not seen that for
other projects. Typically you want to have a single source release
artifact. You could then create "c
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> +1 sig/xsum match up, tested clean and RAT reports fine.
>>
>> It's a bit odd to me that there are two source release artifacts here
>> (one archived with tar/gz th
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:22 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 11 January 2012 18:06, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> In this case the files are exactly the same, there is no difference
>&g
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Brock Noland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
> wrote:
>> OK, I switch my VOTE to +1. The update worked perfectly:
>
> Great! We only need one more +1 from an IPMC member. Is there a list
> somewhere? I bothered Tom Whi
+1. The release looks good. sig/xsum verify, rat looks good, licenses
of included third party code seem to be adhered to, I can build/test
successfully.
Patrick
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version
> 1.4.1-i
+1 sig/xsum are correct, rat is clean, tests all pass. Looks good to me.
Note: the archive includes a mrunit jar file (the only jar file), did
you intend to do this? Typically you want to have a src only artifact,
and one or more artifacts containing "convenience binaries".
Regards,
Patrick
On
+1 sig/xsum are correct, rat is clean, tests all pass. Looks good to me.
Note: the archive includes a mrunit jar file (the only jar file)
'mrunit-0.8.1-incubating-hadoop100.jar'. Might be confusing for
people.
Regards,
Patrick
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Brock Noland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ju
+1 (binding)
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Tommaso Teofili
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> Tommaso
>
> 2012/2/24 Arvind Prabhakar
>
>> This is a call for vote to graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator.
>>
>> Sqoop entered Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added three
>> new committer
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>> Cloudera's compatibility issues are not our problem. These packages need to
>> go.
>
> Citation needed. Without a written policy to that effect these things
> are up for each project t
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> On Feb 28, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Jukka Zitting
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> I'm not sure that JSR specs a
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> I agree that this potentially could be an issue, but whether it's a
>> technical requirement is up to the team who's doing the work. If
>> Apache fe
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Alan D. Cabrera
>> wrote:
>>> On Feb 28, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012
>> Note that API is not just method signatures but includes all aspects
>> of implementation such as class hierarchies, type compatibility,
>> static and non-static state etc.
>
> I think that it's good to have binary compatibility with Cloudera's old
> bindings. I still don't see why it's a req
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Feb 28, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>>> We should also give Arvind and the rest of the Sqoop community some
>>> indication how to proceed, given the voting period is completed.
>>
>> A concern has been raised by IPMC m
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
wrote:
> On the other hand, I totally respect that Cloudera's interest to support
> their customers and provide backword compatibility, but this is *not* the
> point at all, the point is this *should* not, and even allow me to say this
> is *mu
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
> The discussion pertains to the presence of com.cloudera packages in the
> source code of a podling for the sake of backwards compatibility with
> Cloudera products.
Alex this is an incorrect summary of the facts, similar to the FUD you
tri
velopers to explicitly build as per
>>>>>> their hadoop platform.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would also , suggest that the BUILD.txt contains some instructions
>>>>>> about
>>>>>> the build profiles for appropriate had
://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mrunit-dev/201202.mbox/%3CCAFukC%3D4Gie5Yvbyp84QmY%2BtVj9pJ9BMuEv4xeqCSHnamrZX6DQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> Brock
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> me/tom/chris is not sufficient? Or did I miss something?
>&g
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Alex Karasulu
>
>> Sqoop was ASL licensed and had an open following long before it
>> was accepted for incubation
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> +1 - binding
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On Feb 26, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
>> The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's
>> willingness to govern itself through a free
+s4-dev@
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Ping, waiting for a response from s4-dev@ folks.
>
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 16:19:27 +0200:
>> Jukka Zitting wrote on Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 14:41:00 +0100:
>> > Just pick one from the list (ideally one that you a
+1, lgtm. sig/xsums are all correct, was able to build/test
successfully, rat report was clean. I also ran through the incubator
release checklist and everything looks fine.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Brock Noland wrote:
> +1
>
> Verified gpg/md5, unpacking, and startup.
>
> Brock
>
> On Tu
+1 lgtm. The sig/xsum check out. I was able to build the zk debs
successfully on my ubuntu system. I ran through the incubator
checklist and everything seems in order.
I managed to generate the rat report via "mvn apache-rat:check" and it
checked out.
Patrick
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Ala
-1. junit jar (CPL, cat b) is included in the binary artifact however
there is nothing in the notice for this.
Patrick
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Brock Noland wrote:
> Shoot, yes I meant to include them from the start. Current vote is
>
> +1 3 Brock Noland, Jim Donofrio, Jarek Jarcec Cec
> that fixed I will spin up another RC.
>>
>> Brock
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>> -1. junit jar (CPL, cat b) is included in the binary artifact however
>>> there is nothing in the notice for this.
>>>
>&
+1, signatures and xsums all look good, rat passed, tests pass. lgtm.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Brock Noland wrote:
> This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.9.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projec
It's not the job of the incubator to create new rules, but rather to
help podlings to graduation while following existing Apache
guidelines. It's very clear from
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html that what has been proposed
is acceptable under existing Apache rules. Bigtop is building
on/ar
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> It's not the job of the incubator to create new rules, but rather to
>> help podlings to graduation while following existing Apache
>> guidelines.
>
&g
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On May 4, 2012 2:03 PM, "Patrick Hunt" wrote:
>>...
>> EOD existing Apache rules/license make no such distinction. "Works
>> under the following licenses may be included within Apache products"
>
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Perhaps this preso can help a bit:
>> http://people.apache.org/~rvs/apache-bigtop2.pdf
>
> Perfect, thanks!
Roman could you post this on the wiki? (looked but didn't notice it th
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
