On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote: > On Feb 28, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Alex Karasulu <akaras...@apache.org> wrote: > I'm not sure that JSR specs are the same as old Cloudera code. JMHO.
How about phrasing it as "old Sqoop code" instead. :-) Really it's about respect for existing users and others migrating to Apache. It's also about respect for the people doing the work. That's my understanding from discussions with the team at least. > I don't see the technical requirement that this code needs to stay at Apache > and not Cloudera. I agree that this potentially could be an issue, but whether it's a technical requirement is up to the team who's doing the work. If Apache feels that there is a requirement that no project releases code/document/etc... under any package other than org.apache.* then that should be clearly defined and communicated. At this point my understanding is there is no such requirement. Patrick --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
