Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Iggy into the Apache Incubator

This is awesome, thanks Yonik! Really appreciate everyone's support. We are very excited and looking forward to making "Apache Iggy" a great success and contributing to the ASF family! Best, Kranti > On Feb 3, 2025, at 10:01 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > With 21 +1 votes ( 10 binding and 11 no

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Iggy into the Apache Incubator

Hub? Best, Kranti > On Feb 3, 2025, at 10:16 AM, Kranti K. Parisa wrote: > > This is awesome, thanks Yonik! > > Really appreciate everyone's support. We are very excited and looking forward > to making "Apache Iggy" a great success and contributing to the ASF

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Iggy into the Apache Incubator

Thanks Craig! 1. We'll send the SGAs again. 2. We'll brainstorm more about the repo structure with mentors and Iggy community and request the setup accordingly 3. We will remind everyone to email the ICLAs, and request them to mention "iggy" before sending, if they haven't sent the emails yet.

Re: [DISCUSS] Iggy Proposal

t;>> It's great to hear about and see the potential collaboration between >>> Iggy and Kvrocks. >>> >>> On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 at 12:12, Kranti K. Parisa >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks JB, Ayush and Hulk! >>>> >&g

Re: [VOTE] Accept Iggy into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) I'm one of the initial committers on the project :) Best, Kranti > On Jan 31, 2025, at 12:56 PM, Grzegorz Koszyk wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > pt., 31 sty 2025 o 18:28 Yonik Seeley napisał(a): > >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I'd like to call a VOTE to accept Iggy into the Apach

Re: [DISCUSS] Iggy Proposal

Thanks Dave! We plan to group them together with the server releases as much as possible. But we also want to keep them independent with dedicated CI/CD pipelines to allow us release the important fixes/updates as needed. Best, Kranti > On Jan 26, 2025, at 1:55 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Th

Re: [DISCUSS] Iggy Proposal

No problem, Atri. Thanks for your support. We will try to find more mentors as we move forward. In fact, if anyone from Incubator PMC is interested in joining us as a mentor, please let us know :) Best, Kranti > On Jan 28, 2025, at 9:09 AM, Atri Sharma wrote: > > Unfortunately, due to certa

Re: [DISCUSS] Iggy Proposal

1:56, Ayush Saxena wrote: >> >> The proposal looks good. >> >> Good Luck!!! >> >> -Ayush >> >>> On 28 Jan 2025, at 10:44 PM, Kranti K. Parisa >>> wrote: >>> No problem, Atri. Thanks for your support. >>> We will try to fi

Re: [DISCUSS] running a trial where podlings need to have their names reviewed before they join

I think, it makes total sense to do the name search after approval but before onboarding, provided the name search can be done quickly (1-2 weeks max? I'm not sure). Perhaps a separate topic, it would be beneficial to conduct a survey to assess the current onboarding process and identify any ar

Re: [DISCUSS] running a trial where podlings need to have their names reviewed before they join

We've done some research for the name availability when we put together the proposal for Iggy [1]. Please check the "Project Name" section, should we add a section to the proposal template along with asking for Jiras? [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=3400