Please add my account to the ContributorsGroup

Hello, Please add my account, James.Taylor to the ContributorsGroup as I'd like to create a wiki for a new proposal for an Apache Incubator project. Thanks, James

[PROPOSAL] Phoenix for Incubation

will migrate to the Apache JIRA: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX === Other Resources === * Jenkins/Hudson for builds and test running. * Wiki for documentation purposes * Blog to improve project dissemination == Initial Committers == * James Taylor * Mujtaba Chohan * Jess

Re: [PROPOSAL] Phoenix for Incubation

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Henry Saputra > wrote: > > > It is indeed very specific for HBase use I suppose. Would it be more > > beneficial to make it sub-project of HBase to get full community > > support from HBase? > > The back

Re: [PROPOSAL] Phoenix for Incubation

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >* I am sure with the name like Phoenix there's tons of clashes, > but perhaps Apache Phoenix should be fine We'd be fine with "Apache Phoenix". >* How tightly coupled is it with HBase? IOW, do you anticipate > needing to

application for applying to be part of the IPMC?

Hello, I understand from here[1] that Mentors must be part of the IPMC. Is there an official application or set of questions that one should fill out if he or she would like to be considered? Thanks, James [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#mentors-ipmc --

Re: [VOTE] Phoenix for incubator project

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Stack wrote: > Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original > posting on November 7th. Feedback has been incorporated. > > Let us now move to a vote. > > Should Phoenix become an Apache incubator project? > > [] +1 Accept Phoenix into the Incu

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Andrew Purtell joins the IPMC

Congrats, Andrew! On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > Hi all, > > Incubator PMC has voted to offer membership to Andrew Purtell, who has > accepted to joined the ranks. > > Andrew is a true multi-project person. He is HBase and Whirr PMC member and > a Bigtop committer. He is

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Lars Hofhansl joins the IPMC

Great news! Congrats, Lars! On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > Hi all, > > Incubator PMC has voted to offer membership to Lars Hofhansl, who has > accepted to joined the ranks. > > Lars is a seasoned member of HBase PMC with deep technical skills and he is > also a proposed

Re: [VOTE] Phoenix for incubator project

gt; External Dependencies > > > > Beyond relying on Apache HBase, Phoenix has the following external > > dependencies: > > > > ANTLR 3.5 (BSD license: http://www.antlr3.org/license.html) > > > > Sqlline 1.1.2 (BSD license: > > https://github.com/julianhyde/sqlline

transferring Github issues to JIRA?

Hello, Anyone out there know of an automated way of transferring over Github issues to JIRA? We're in the process of transferring over our existing Phoenix Github-based open source project to our Apache incubator project and automating the seeding of the initial JIRAs would be very helpful. Thanks,

Re: transferring Github issues to JIRA?

ticket to plug that in and run an > import? > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > > > > > >> Atlassian provides a plugin for that: > > >> > > >> > > > https://marketplace.atlassian.com/plugins/com.atlassian

best development methodology for Apache git?

The Phoenix project has recently come into incubation from it's former life as a Github project. I believe other projects have made this same transition, so I'm looking to get some advice from them. What's the best development methodology folks have found for collaborative development when your sou

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

FYI, we have an on-going thread for the git/github discussion here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201402.mbox/%3CCAEWfVJ%3D_wtDRTNEz4ojvUBf50_VdLDUhiQ15q5rfvFi5eh76uw%40mail.gmail.com%3E For Phoenix, we'll likely mimic what JClouds is doing, but I live Lar's ideas as a

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating

Hello everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This will be our first release in the incubator. The RC is a

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating

I'll cancel this vote and start a vote on a new RC shortly. There was a pretty serious bug that was found in this one anyway. Is it best practice to have a separate source-only tar bar and not include the source in the binary tar ball? Or should it be included in both? Thanks, James On Mon, Feb

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating

This vote is being cancelled because the RC did not include a source-only tar ball. A new vote thread will be started with one that does. Regards, James On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:12 PM, James Taylor wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 i

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating

Hello everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This will be our first release in the incubator. The RC is a

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating

Thanks so much, David for the review and words of encouragement. Don't worry, we won't get discouraged - we just want to get this right. See below for more questions/comments. Regards, James On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:26 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:37 PM,

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating

Cancelling this vote due to mistakes in the LICENSE and NOTICE files. Will start a new vote shortly. Thanks, James On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:08 AM, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:43 PM, James Taylor > wrote: > > Thanks so much, David for the review and words of e

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating RC4

Hello Everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating RC4. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This will be our first release in the incubator. The releas

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating RC4

e. Thanks, James On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:18 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:43 PM, James Taylor > wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating RC4. Phoenix > > is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating RC4

n Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:33 PM, James Taylor > wrote: > > Thanks for the review, David. We do have a NOTICE.txt in both the source > > and binary tar ball (in the phoenix-2.2.3-incubating directory). Is that > > the correct way to do it? > > > > We'll add the

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating RC4

Thanks, Marvin. We'll update this in our next release too, as we'd like to follow the preferred path. With these changes for our next release, are we good to go for this release? Thanks, James On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating RC4

Would it be possible for an IPMC member to clarify if you're waiting on us for something and if so what? Thanks, James On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:11 AM, James Taylor wrote: > Thanks, Marvin. We'll update this in our next release too, as we'd like to > follow the preferred

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating RC4

). > > > > - Checked the src and binary artifacts. > > - Checked sigs > > - Checked CRCs > > - Built the src artifacts > > > > If the DISCLAIMER file will not sink the RC, lets go ahead with releasing > > this. Otherwise we would need a new RC. > > > >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating RC4

the ticket to address the Disclaimer file for the release. > > On Thursday, March 13, 2014, James Taylor wrote: > > > Voting is now closed. This vote passes with 4 binding +1 votes and no 0 > > or -1 votes. Thank you to everyone who voted. Totals: > > > > +1: &

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Phoenix 2.2.3-incubating released

Hello, The Apache Phoenix team is pleased to announce the release of version 2.2.3-incubating from the Apache Incubator. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. The source and bin

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

Hi everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This is the next major release of Phoenix compatible with the

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC1

Hi everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC1. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This is the next major release of Phoenix compatible with the

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

hy the Git tag does not agree > > with the source archive, otherwise the new RC may also be faulty in > > that regard. > > > > It's vital that all files in the source bundle can be traced back to > > the source code control system. > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC1

0.0) at the same time? > Or maybe my gmail thread history is messed up. > > - Henry > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:46 AM, James Taylor > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC1. Phoenix > > is a SQL query eng

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

trying to follow the guidelines listed here[1]. Thanks, James [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:48 PM, sebb wrote: > On 25 March 2014 22:27, James Taylor wrote: > > Thanks for the detailed review, Sebb. We really appreciate you spending > > y

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

t that invokes it - would that be correct? For our HBase dependencies, we have many places in the source that call HBase APIs. Do we just list one of them? On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:25 PM, sebb wrote: > On 25 March 2014 23:06, James Taylor wrote: > > Our binary distribution bundle

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

(sorry, meant instead of listing these in our NOTICE file) On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:48 PM, James Taylor wrote: > Ah, I see. Thanks, Sebb. So we should modify our LICENSE file as indicated > in http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps instead > of listing the

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:07 PM, sebb wrote: > > > HBase is ASF code surely? > So why does it need mentioning? - unless its NOTICE file has some > attributions that relate to what you are bundling > Yes, HBase is ASF code. The other stuff we've listed are the transitive dependencies of HBase. Do

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:28 PM, sebb wrote: > On 26 March 2014 00:23, James Taylor wrote: > > I think I was confused by the > > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#deps-of-depsinstructions. > > What is confusing about that? > If it is not clear, how could it

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:25 PM, sebb wrote: > > > > Yes, we bundle ANTLR in our binary distribution. Most of the other > items > > > are pulled in based on the transitive dependencies of other jars we've > > > bundled in our binary distri

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

Thanks for all the feedback. We'll spin up another RC shortly for our 3.0 and 4.0 release with the corrections to our NOTICE and LICENSE files, along with ensuring that our source release matches the source bundle exactly. One question: given that we'll indicate the bundled products and their lice

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

Below is our updated NOTICE (which includes the copyright for the bundled bits) and LICENSE (minus the standard Apache 2.0 part). Would appreciate a review. Thanks, James * NOTICE ** Apache Phoenix (Incubating) Copyright 2014 The Apache Software F

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

Thanks, Marvin. So remove the copyrights from NOTICE. Are they required anywhere then, as their not in the LICENSE file? On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:59 PM, James Taylor > wrote: > > Below is our updated NOTICE (which

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

ks, James On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:04 PM, James Taylor wrote: > Thanks, Marvin. So remove the copyrights from NOTICE. Are they required > anywhere then, as their not in the LICENSE file? > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > >> On Wed, Ma

[DISCUSS] Where does copyright information go for a binary distribution?

Hello, I'm getting a release ready for Apache Phoenix (incubating) and have a question about where copyright information should go for our binary distribution. It seems that there's quite a bit of variation, as all projects are different. So I'll describe our binary distribution, and perhaps others

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

-q3mNMRQqC2vTA%40mail.gmail.com%3E On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:38 PM, sebb wrote: > On 26 March 2014 19:59, James Taylor wrote: > > Below is our updated NOTICE (which includes the copyright for the bundled > > bits) and LICENSE (minus the standard Apache 2.0 part). > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Where does copyright information go for a binary distribution?

Where does the copyright information go in our case? On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:48 PM, sebb wrote: > On 26 March 2014 23:55, James Taylor wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm getting a release ready for Apache Phoenix (incubating) and have a > > question about where copyright

Re: [DISCUSS] Where does copyright information go for a binary distribution?

do I know if something is a "required attributions"? On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:02 PM, sebb wrote: > On 27 March 2014 00:52, James Taylor wrote: > > Where does the copyright information go in our case? > > What copyright information? > Where was it originally? > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Where does copyright information go for a binary distribution?

Hi Justin, Yes, our source and binary releases have different NOTICE/LICENSE files. The source ones are simple, as we have no dependencies. It's the binary one I'm trying to get clarity on. Thanks, James On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I assuming you source and bi

Re: [DISCUSS] Where does copyright information go for a binary distribution?

; On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:06 PM, James Taylor > wrote: > > The copyright for the bits we're bundling. See the LICENSE file I > included > > at the end of my email. For example: > > > > Guava, version 12.0.1, http://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/ > &g

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC3

Hi everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC3. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This is the next major release of Phoenix compatible with the

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC3

Hi everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC3. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This is the next major release of Phoenix compatible with the

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC3

AM, Steven Noels wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014, at 10:40 PM, James Taylor wrote: > > > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Please vote: > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > &

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC3

Voting is now closed. This vote passes with 4 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Thank you to everyone who voted. Totals: +1: Michael Stack* Steven Noels* Enis Söztutar* Devaraj Das* * = IPMC I'll send out an announcement and we'll push the release out once HBase 0.98.1 is released. Thanks, James

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Phoenix 3.0.0-incubating released

Hello everyone, The Apache Phoenix team is pleased to announce the release of version 3.0.0-incubating from the Apache Incubator. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. Major new

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Phoenix 4.0.0-incubating released

Hello everyone, The Apache Phoenix team is pleased to announce the release of version 4.0.0-incubating from the Apache Incubator. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. This is the

[VOTE] Graduation of Apache Phoenix from the Incubator

Hi everyone, The Apache Phoenix podling has has discussed and voted to graduate from the incubator with 22 +1 votes, 5 of which were IPMC vote [1]. We've made three releases, increased our contributor and committer list [2], and have an active, thriving community. Please VOTE below on the graduat

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Phoenix from the Incubator

+1 On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Enis > > > On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Devaraj Das wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:44 PM, James Taylor > > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > &

[RESULT][VOTE] Graduation of Apache Phoenix from the Incubator

Hello everyone, I'm pleased to report that this VOTE has passed with the 9 +1 votes (7 binding): +1 Eli Levine Steven Noels* Michael Stack* Andrew Purtell* Roman Shaposhnik* Lars Hofhansl* Devaraj Das* Enis Söztutar* James Taylor * - indicates IPMC I will add the resolution to the board a

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Jun 2014 ([ppmc])

FYI, Phoenix has graduated as reported last month. Thanks, James On Wednesday, May 28, 2014, Marvin wrote: > > > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. > It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your > quarterl

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Jun 2014 ([ppmc])

gt; > -Jake > > [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#unincubate > > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:41 PM, James Taylor >wrote: > > > FYI, Phoenix has graduated as reported last month. > > Thanks, > > James > > > > On We

interested in joining the IPMC

Hello, I'm the PMC Chair for Apache Phoenix and a PMC member of Apache Calcite, both top level project and both of which I went through the incubation process. Recently several projects interested in going through incubation approached me to be a mentor, hence my interest in joining - so that I can

Re: interested in joining the IPMC

My apologies, Marvin, and thanks for clarifying the procedure. I'll follow up on the private list. James On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 11:04 AM, James Taylor > wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm the PMC Chair for Apa

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding). Interesting proposal and I love the name. On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Seetharam Venkatesh < venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote: > +1 (binding). > > Thanks! > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:49 AM Julian Hyde wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Julian > > > > > On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:43

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > the Beam proposal (initially Dataflow) was proposed last week. > > The complete discussion thread is available here: > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201601.mbox/%3CCA%2B%3DKJmvj4w

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quarks into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards, > Arvind > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Katherine Marsden > wrote: > > > The Quarks proposal has been discussed on the incubator list. The > > discussion thread is at: > > > > > http://mail-archives.a

Re: [VOTE] Accept Mnemonic into the Apache Incubator

t onto ASF > > > infrastructure and in turn made available under the Apache License, > > > version 2.0. > > > > > > === External Dependencies === > > > The required external dependencies are all Apache licenses or other > > > compatible Lice

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Greetings, > > The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has concluded. Please vote to > accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator. I will leave this vote open for > at least the next 72 hours and will aim to close it Monday the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator

e incubation > > process > > Cask Data will transfer the trademark to Apache Foundation. > > > > = External Dependencies = > > > > The dependencies all have Apache-compatible licenses: > > * dropwizard metrics (Apache 2.0) > > * fastutil (Apache

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

on Apache Zookeeper and Curator projects in order to > > > > coordinate the (re)connection of transaction managers (acting as > > > > clients) to the conflict resolution component for transactions > (server > > > > side.) They’re also used in order to c

Re: [VOTE] Accept Omid into the Apache Incubator

ies that are not Apache projects are > >all Apache licenses or other compatible Licenses: > > > > > >Maven & Maven plugins (http://maven.apache.org/) [Apache 2.0] > >JDK7 or OpenJDK 7 (http://java.com/) [Oracle or Openjdk JDK License] > >Google Guava v11.0.2 (https://gith

Re: Final draft of the Incubator Board Report - April 2016

Me too - my bad. So sorry. I'm embarrassed to admit I can't find an email for it. On Tuesday, April 12, 2016, Henry Saputra wrote: > No need to be curious too much, mea culpa from me for missing signing off > the report :) > > I had the impression I did sign off the report for Mnemonic, sincerel

Re: [VOTE] Accept Fluo into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Billie Rinaldi > wrote: > > Since discussion has died down, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting > > Fluo into the Apache Incubator. > > > > Proposal: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/F

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

+1. Transferring my vote over from the previous vote thread. On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Poorna Chandra wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.8.0-incubating, > release candidate 1. This > is the first release of Tephra. > > Apache Tephra community has v

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

Thanks for the reviews. There are a few files with a package of co.cask.tephra in order to maintain backward compatibility with pre Apache-based releases. These will be removed in a follow on release. James On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > The source code s

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

Thanks for the testing, John. It builds on my MacBook Pro: OS X Version 10.11.4 java version 1.7.0_80 What's your system look like? On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 6:53 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Hi, > > I'm +0 for right now unless there's a way to make the code build and test > on a mac and I

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

, that can be a networking problem on Macs unless using a > very recent version of the JDK, or any number of reasons really > (minicluster is as complex as it sounds). Anyway, perhaps posting the > complete test output from surefire to the project JIRA is in order? > > > > On May

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

licenses that we would need to include? > I realize this may sound like nit-picking. But it is an important aspect > of the incubation time. > > I have to vote -1 . > > -- Lars > > From: James Taylor > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > Sent: Frida

Re: [VOTE] Accept PredictionIO into the Apache Incubator

https://predictionio.incubator.apache.org/docs/ > > > > JIRA instance > > > > PredictionIO currently uses the GitHub issue tracking system associated > > with its repository: > https://github.com/PredictionIO/PredictionIO/issues > > . > > We w

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Daniel Gruno > wrote: > > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Twill as Top Level Project

+1 (binding) On Thursday, June 2, 2016, Andrew Purtell wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Henry Saputra > > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Following the DISCUSS thread about Apache Twill graduating as TLP, I > would > > like to send VOTE request thread. > > > > All the +1 b

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.9.0-incubating [rc1]

Transferring my +1 from dev vote here. On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Poorna Chandra wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.9.0-incubating, > release candidate 1. This is the second release of Tephra. > > Apache Tephra community has voted and approved the

Re: [RESTART] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Beam

+1 (binding) On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Tom Barber wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Sandeep Deshmukh < > sand...@datatorrent.com> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Regards,

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

+1. Verified all Phoenix unit tests pass with the proposed release. James On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. > > Alan. > > > On Dec 12, 2016, at 15:46, Gokul Gunasekaran wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > This is a call for a vote on releas

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.11.0-incubating [rc1]

Transferring my +1 from the dev list vote over here. On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Gokul Gunasekaran wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.11.0-incubating, > release candidate 1. This is the fourth release of Tephra. > > Apache Tephra community has voted

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.11.0-incubating [rc1]

Looks like a serious issue was found with TEPHRA-223, so switching my vote to -1. Hopefully we can get a quick fix with a new RC very soon. James On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. > > Alan. > > > On Feb 17, 2017,

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.11.0-incubating [rc1]

ough by marking TEPHRA-223 as a known > issue. We can do a 0.11.1 release immediately after fixing TEPHRA-223. > > Thanks, > Poorna. > > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:37 PM, James Taylor > wrote: > > > Looks like a serious issue was found with TEPHRA-223, so swi

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.11.0-incubating [rc2]

Forwarding my +1 from dev list too. On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 8:53 AM Alan Gates wrote: > Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. > > Alan. > > > On Mar 10, 2017, at 5:18 PM, Gokul Gunasekaran wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.11.0-incubating, > > r

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.12.0-incubating [rc1]

+1. The RC passes all Phoenix unit tests. On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. > > Alan. > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Gokul Gunasekaran > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.12.0-incubati

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]

+1. Transferring my vote over from the dev list vote. On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Andreas Neumann wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating, > release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra. > > The Apache Tephra community has vot

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Mnemonic project from Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Luke Han wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > Best Regards! > - > > Luke Han > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Sep 19, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Johnu George wr

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]

John - thanks for the review. If things look acceptable now, would you be willing to cast a vote? Anyone else? Thanks, James On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:58 AM Gokul Gunasekaran wrote: > Thanks, John! Is there anything else that we can do to address > concerns/issues regarding the release candid

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]

I thought John already changed his vote to +1 based on this comment, no? > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:56 PM, John D. Ament > > wrote: > > > >> I'm fine with giving a +1 assuming the NOTICE issue is fixed for next > >> release. Please feel free to ping me if you want a review of the NOTICE > >> co

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]

John - there appears to be some confusion. Would you mind clearing up whether you voted or not? Sorry for bugging you. Thanks, James On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:30 PM, James Taylor wrote: > I thought John already changed his vote to +1 based on this comment, no? > > > On Wed, Sep 2

Re: [VOTE] Accept Druid into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > After some discussion on the Druid proposal[1], I'd like to > > start a vote on accepting Druid into the Apache Incubator, > > per

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0 (incubating)

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. James On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 8:31 AM Henk P. Penning wrote: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, Ohad Shacham wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:29:55 +0100 > > From: Ohad Shacham > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 0.9.0.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0 (incubating)

@Justin - thanks for taking the time to review. Really appreciate it. Looks like there's some confusion, though. Prior to starting this vote, you approved the change on the JIRA here[1], but now you've -1'ed the release. At this point, we're trying to get clarification on OMID-44 so that when we go

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0 (incubating)

+1 (transferring my vote over from dev list vote) On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Ohad Shacham wrote: > Hi, > > > The Apache Omid community has voted on and approved a proposal > to release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0-incubating. > > PPMC Vote Call:http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/omid-dev/ >

[VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

Hi all, This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.14.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This is the seventh release of Tephra. The Tephra dev community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Tephra 0.14.0-incubating, release candidate 1. PPMC Vote Call: https://s.apache.org/

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

ntain LICENSE and NOTICE files. I'm not sure how this > > happened, since these files are typically added by default when projects > > use the ASF parent pom. > > > > Billie > > > > On 5/21/18 6:51 PM, James Taylor wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > &

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

The vote is now closed and passes with 7 +1 votes and no +0 or -1 votes. Thanks to everyone who voted. James On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:03 PM, James Taylor wrote: > +1 (transferred from my dev vote) > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 6:49 AM, larry mccay wrote: > >> * built f

[VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.15.0-incubating [rc1]

Hi all, This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.15.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This is the eighth release of Tephra. The Tephra dev community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Tephra 0.15.0-incubating, release candidate 1. PPMC Vote Call: https://s.apache.org/6

Re: [PROPOSAL] Zipkin for Apache Incubator

+1 On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 3:11 AM wrote: > Very excited about the proposal and looking forward to the Apache journey. > > Bas van Beek > > On 2018/08/17 09:29:47, Adrian Cole wrote: > > I would like to propose Zipkin as an Apache Incubator project.> > > > > The text of the proposal can be foun

  1   2   >