+1
Hans
--- Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear WS PMC Members,
>
> As hinted in the previous discussions[1] Could we please
> demote tsik
> to dormant status (Since It has very little activity and no
> release)
> [ ] +1 - Demote
> [ ] -1 - Keep [tsik] alive, because...
>
> Than
Hi
I want to move a failed incubation project (TSIK) to Google Code,
but the source is full of org.apache.* packages, so I'm not sure
what the right way to do this is. (The code would keep the same
ASF 2.0 license.)
Changing the package names will break any and all code, so if
it'd be great if th
On 1/23/08, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Carman wrote:
> It seems that there are two discussions going on at the same time:
>
>1. Whether it is cool for people to do this.
>2. Whether we should try to stop people from doing this.
>
> I am pretty sure that we all agree
> But I believe that the IP is
> tainted (and constrained) for TSIK, which is why it failed in the first
> place.
No, it failed really because there weren't enough people interested
and working on it. All the legal IP issues were cleared.
-Hans
---
> 1. Name change
> No one but me knows where the name Caitrin came from and it isn't obvious
> what the software would do. A proposed solution (thanks Noel for the path
> suggestion) would be PhosLibrarius
I don't think the new name is much better! Who knows what "Phos" is? Vietnamese
noodl
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
OK, we're almost there ;)
Lokahi, stdcxx, TSIK, WSRP4J, y'all still have a few hours.
Hi Yoav,
TSIK failed incubation a few months back -- I'm not sure why
its name keeps popping up. Is there something that I failed
to "close out" on TSIK?
In fact, since I'm reminde
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Done with all the 4 items.
Thanks, dims. -Hans
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
