On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > There were just two.
>
> Correct it shows two answers randomly out the 3 it knows about. That way
> it’s a little different every time.
>
So you're saying that I answer "No" from the two chosen, the ONLY correct
answer, and it st
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:35 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > There were just two.
>>
>> Correct it shows two answers randomly out the 3 it knows about. That way
>> it’s
Misleading.
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:35 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Justin Mclean
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> > There were j
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:41 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > So you're saying that I answer "No" from the two chosen, the ONLY correct
> > answer, and it still dings me?
>
> Grep I don't know what two options it gave you from the 3 possible
> answers, 2 of them are right 1 isn’t. No is not
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:45 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > And as you suggested, the possibility of erroneous Q&A. I just got:
> "Releases
> > use majority approval voting (i.e at least 3 +1 votes and more +1 votes
> > than -1 votes) and the vote should to be open 72 hours so that everyon
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:52 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > "manually placed into www.apache.org/dist" ... I left that box
> unchecked,
> > and well... dang. I still got it wrong, it seems.
>
> There no question with that answer that I can see. There’s is one that say
> "Place the artifact
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:01 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> HI,
>
> > No, I'm not gonna issue PRs. The methodology of presenting 2 of 3
> answers,
> > then saying I got it wrong because I couldn't click that not-shown 3rd…
>
> It not doing that it only scores the check boxes on the screen.
>
And as
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:20 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Here is the precise display:
> >
> > Can Apache distribute products under a prohibited ('Category X') license?
> > No (with a couple of exceptions).Yes but only for some common build
> tools.
> >
> > So I go ahead and click "No" b
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:44 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> HI,
>
> > *Dependencies* to build the products. We don't include autoconf itself
>
> Not all of it but you do need to include GPL licensed files. An example
> [1].
>
> Except that they do have a get out jail free provision in them “You need
+1 to retire (binding)
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Iota podling.
>
> The podling has discussed retirement [1], has not made a single release
> and there's been little activity on it’s mailing list [2] and repos [
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 2:45 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 02/12/2018 09:42 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> I have a little question regarding binary data in ASF repos.
> >
> > IMO It’s only compiled code that’s not allowed, other binary formats
> like image, pdfs, fonts etc ect are all
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 4:25 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> 2018-02-14 14:15 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz :
>
> > I am currently finishing some magazine articles about Apache PLC4X and
> Apache Edgent and therefore sent Sally my documents fort he official „ok“ …
> I should add the incubation disclaime
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/03/18 21:47, Chris Lambertus wrote:
> > My understanding is that any pmc-chair can create resources for any
> project via selfserve.a.o. It does not have to be the pmc chair of that
> specific project, so there should be quite a few peop
Nothing happens. There are no binding (PPMC) votes.
That said, if the PPMC doesn't even weigh in, then the podling probably
ought to be retired (due to lack of oversight/involvement). And that would
be the IPMC voting for the retirement.
Cheers,
-g
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:31 PM, lewis john m
Using download.cgi or closer.lua (ie. using the mirror network) has been
Apache policy since its inception. This is not "recently".
http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#host-GA
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 3:48 AM, Pierre Smits
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In dec 2017 the Apache Trafodion Projec
age's incorrect
link. I don't think we would edit your page, but we *can* stop your misuse
of www.a.o/dist, and recommend you switch to using the mirror network, per
release policy.
Consider Trafodion officially warned. cc:dev@trafodion
Regards,
Greg Stein
Infrastructure Administrator
wrote:
> Greg,
>
> I'm confused about this warning. It looks like Pierre was explicitly
> telling people not to do the wrong thing, and spot checking their website
> the download links point to the mirror page for at least their latest
> release.
>
> Mike
>
> On Su
Looks like they've updated the web page just recently. Agreed: it has the
correct links now.
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 5:21 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Hey Mike,
>
> The latest release (2.2.0) has this link for the source:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/trafodion/apache-trafodion-2.
One step at a time. If they want to throw a single page up *today* rather
than wait six weeks to fully port their website... I would take the page.
We already had an inquiry on Druid of where their site is.
A placeholder is better than a 404. Unless, of course, you are personally
volunteering to q
gt;
> John
>
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 12:02 AM Julian Hyde
> wrote:
>
> > I (as a Druid mentor) suggested the placeholder page, for the exact
> > reasons Greg describes. Short term, I promise, and better than a 404.
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > > On
should indicate these are not Apache releases.
> >
> > Perhaps Mark T has some more input on the branding and naming aspects.
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 12:02 AM Julian Hyde
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I (as a Druid mentor) suggeste
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 9:30 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 12:37 PM, Dave Fisher
> wrote:
> > Hi -
> >
> > I think that a brand compliant initial podling page would not be hard to
> > create using the Apache CMS.
>
The CMS is deprecated. No podlings/TLPs can choose to set up
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:21 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:39 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> > ...Most places I've seen the CMS still in use was because of svnpubsub,
> not
> > necessarily cms.a.o. We use it to commit the output from
> maven-s
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:22 PM, toki wrote:
>...
> In theory, that sounds good, but as a practical matter, how many people
> that have ever been on the ASF board of directors neither know/knew, nor
> use(d) any programming languages in getting there? IOW, they got there
> exclusively on their ab
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 8:57 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>...
> Greg - You know which project I’m thinking about - OpenOffice.org. (1) I
> can see a way to make Jekyll or something similar function for site
> generation. Since I did the migration in I ought to be able to migrate out.
> (2) The main ch
ache, of course. The
restriction merely applies to any compatibility/historical shims that are
retained, to map the old-named packages over to new org.apache naming.
Regards,
Greg Stein
Infrastructure Administrator, ASF
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
> Was there discussion somewher
Please note: my initial message was not to question the release process.
Merely that Infra was asked to enable provision of artifacts within Maven
Central under a groupId that is not "org.apache". At the moment, we cannot
/ will-not work on making that possible. Infra doesn't involve itself in
comm
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:31 AM, Huxing Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Willem Jiang
> wrote:
> > Is there any plan for going through the vote process of Binary file?
>
> Yes, binaries will also go through the vote process.
No. It makes no sense.
There is NO WAY to ver
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 9:50 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> > In other words, there are several ways to prove that a binary release is
> WRONG but (to Greg’s point) there is no way to prove it RIGHT.
>
> That's actually a great way to put it.
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:52 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Javascript code that is minified or combined in any major way is much
> more
> > like binary code in that respect. It is true that somebody *could*
> inspect
> > the correlation, but it is not true that this inspection is either
> n
Agreed. I've used graphviz many times over the years, and would love to
call it Apache Graphviz :-)
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 2:21 PM Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> License is an issue with GraphViz but I'm +1 to help them come under the
> ASF umbrella!
>
> --
> Kevin A. McGrail
> VP Fundraising, Apache
Leveling. Which group has the fewest? Boom.
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 7:06 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> I always assumed that it was based on the month the podling joins. Since
> there are 3 reporting groups, the decision on who to report is on the mod
> of the current month number against 3, so I
And another +1 from myself, as a Director voting on that
proposal/resolution.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> The structure would still be there - my hypothesis is that the
> mentors + the board will both uplift structure, and h
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 4:04 AM, jan i wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 30, 2014, Bertrand Delacretaz >
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Andrew Purtell
> > > wrote:
> > > ...Certainly some projects have a de facto lead that coincide with
> Chair
> > and I'm pretty sure
> > > in some
Roman kicked off a query about "next steps", with links to several wiki
pages on possibilities. The "IncubatorV2" page which describes a
"probationary TLP" is nothing like I have thought about.
In my mind, a pTLP looks *exactly* like any other PMC. They report directly
to the Board, they have inf
trand Delacretaz"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> > ...1. probationary text is prominent,...
>
> > ...2. the initial PMC is comprised of only ASF Members...
>
> I like that proposal, it's simple and looks actionable.
On Jan 23, 2015 8:53 AM, "jan i" wrote:
>
> On 23 January 2015 at 14:42, Greg Stein wrote:
> >...
>
> I agree with everything else you write, but the demand for "only ASF
> Members" seems very hard. If I come to ASF with a community and a project,
>
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
>...
> Time is on the side of those who think shepherd institution should die. It
> would be better if it died quickly, vacating the report review mindspace
> and
> making way for Mentor commentary supplemented by reactive IPMC report
> fe
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 6:18 PM, jan i wrote:
> On Saturday, January 24, 2015, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <
> ross.gard...@microsoft.com
> > wrote:
>
> > No, the PMC is *not* the driving force. The project community is, even
> > where the PMC is a subset of the committers. Since it is the set of
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> On 1/23/15, 1:34 PM, "Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)"
> wrote:
>
> >A good mentor is a guide, not a manager.
> >
> >The proposals might seem top down, but when executed correctly, they are
> >not.
>
> OK, I'll accept that, but if executed correct
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
>...
> project, they become a PPMC, a podling. Sure, the IPMC provides oversight,
> and the board again, but the PPMC can make binding votes on committers,
> releases, everything that matters - provisionally, of course, which is
> completely
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> > There is nothing stopping the IPMC from designating certain Mentors as
> > shepherds for their podlings.
>
> Having volunteers step forw
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> > This is *exactly* the way things work in a TLP.
>
> Yes, everyone new to the Foundation on the PPMC has a sense of equal
> ownership in the process. The PPMC makes a decision together as equals,
> then the decision is reviewed as a whole.
vote on releases, new
> committers, and elevating committers to PMC.
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Andrew Purtell
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > This is *exactly* the way things work in a TLP.
> &
Go to the FIRST POST of this thread (titled: "my pTLP view"!!). THAT is
what we're talking about. Not the Strawman.
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Oh, my mistake! (smile) I confused pTLP with the "Strawman" proposal there
> for a minute. In the pTLP proposal, there are
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Jan 25, 2015, at 1:22 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> >>> ...The
There are a few things that I would suggest for "next steps":
1) Draft a template resolution. Starting in the wiki is fine, but you'll
want to involve board@ when you have your first draft done. This will also
start the discussion among the Directors (recall: the Board hasn't even
agreed to try th
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
>...
> Totally agreed! Who can help me learning the ropes on how ComDev
> documentation is maintained, etc?
>
Maybe ask on dev@community rather than general@ ?? :-P
This release announcement does not contain the required DISCLAIMER
necessary for all incubating projects.
Please see:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Steve Blackmon
wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce immediate availability of streams 0.1-incubat
This release announcement does not contain the required DISCLAIMER
necessary for all incubating projects.
Please see:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> The Apache Slider team is proud to announce Apache Slider incubation
> re
Heh. Just saw how old this release was... :-P
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> This release announcement does not contain the required DISCLAIMER
> necessary for all incubating projects.
>
> Please see:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html
>
doesn't forget it
> like I did.
>
>
> Greg Stein wrote:
>
>> Heh. Just saw how old this release was... :-P
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>
>> This release announcement does not contain the required DI
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I missed a few important points in this thread last week, with which I
> disagree:
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> > ...1) Draft a template resolution. Starting in the wi
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> >
> > Who ever said the Incubator has the exclusive Right to be the only way to
> > become part of the Apache Software Foundation? New approaches can be
> > discus
This is fantastic. Thanks you, Niclas!
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Roman,
>
> See comments below to
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/Provisional+TLP
>
>
> 2.1 --> I suggest to change the word "probationary" to "provisional". I
> also suggest that
"if we accept" ... take a position, Ross.
The two problems *are* orthogonal. The IPMC can do whatever it likes. A
pTLP is a proposal to the Board.
Bertrand would like to see discussion on general@incubator, but that is
merely a handy location. It actually has zero to do with the Incubator.
Ross:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Hi Niclas,
>
> I'm in favor of the overall pTLP process. I don't
> agree with others that it hasn't been well specified yet. I
>
There is (yet) a singular page that defines the process. Roman has b
with that. And if
> someone does claim this then the two things are not orthogonal.
>
> Ross
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
>
> From: Greg Stein<mailto:gst...@gmail.com>
> Sent: 2/24/2015 12:32 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org<
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>...
> Sam --> Think there is no need for a new concept, and have no problem with
> incoming projects backed by ASF veterans to bypass the Incubator.
>
I believe Sam gave this based on a singular, concrete proposal. He would
likely respond d
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Niclas Hedhman
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:27 PM, jan i wrote:
> >> The proposal only refer to new projects entering Apache, would it be
> worth
> >> while to consider a way for projects that e
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
> wrote:
> > ...either this pTLP idea is independent of the IPMC. Or it is not
>
> I think it is actually in between ;-)
>
> While the pTLP itself, once created by the boa
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacre...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >> ...the steps that lead to the board voting on the
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacre...@apache.org>
> >>...The Incubator PMC might not have a
> >> formal say in pT
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:56 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Roman,
>
> I don't think much is missing. One of my concerns with all of these
> proposals, especially for participants like myself, is the difference in
> how the IPMC operates vs how these PMCs must operate. For someone like me,
> I would
I'd suggest striking the user@ mailing list. Keep the community (such as it
is) on dev@ until traffic gets too heavy. I've seen early splitting of the
user/dev keep a new project from reaching a good critical mass.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Initial sketch placed on the w
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
>...
>
> our own project operations, which we'll do in any case. The presumed
> pTLP would be to develop the code; I could easily imagine some of the
> code being useful as examples outside of the ASF. Being a pTLP would
> also make developme
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> > I'd suggest striking the user@ mailing list. Keep the community (such
> as it
> > is) on dev@ until traffic gets too heavy. I've seen early splitting of
&
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <
ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> It's a tough one. We could be setting a precedence here that we absolutely
> do not want to set. On the other hand, it's problematic (not to mention
> simply ridiculous) if the foundation not being
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
>...
> In case you're curious -- I'd ask the same question, for example,
> about a community
> that decided to produce software that is be only applicable as an add-on
> for a small market share commercial offering.
>
The Foundation does
To clarify one step further: podlings are not official projects, so any
outreach via apache.org (and its name/recognition) needs appropriate
messaging. That is why we have press@ :-)
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <
ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> It's not ComD
hahaha funny that the template at that site says the software is in the
public domain, but then goes on to state what can be done with it, and to
provide a disclaimer. If it is truly in the public domain, then no futher
discussion is needed.
And note that some jurisdictions (eg France) don't a
Hello, Lens people!
In the future, please ensure that *all* release announcements include the
Incubating "Disclaimer" in them. Your download page should be updated
(asap) to include the same.
Thanks,
-g
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Amareshwari Sriramdasu <
amareshw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
On Jul 29, 2015 11:37 AM, "Branko Čibej" wrote:
>
> On 29.07.2015 18:14, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015, at 03:19 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> >> Personally I'm not too happy with how this community tracks issues, but
> >> hey, if it works for them, why fix it? It'll be a fine day whe
On Jul 29, 2015 12:45 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:25PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Jul 29, 2015 11:37 AM, "Branko Čibej" wrote:
> > >
> > > On 29.07.2015 18:14, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > &
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 2:08 PM Ryan Blue wrote:
>...
> 2. The license problems so far show that the project has not paid adequate
> attention to licensing up to now, which is a big risk. I'd like to see what
> kind of licensing scrub is proposed before the potential podling's first
> release. I
Heya Ryan,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 2:39 PM Ryan Blue wrote:
> > we have allowed (and IMO should continue) podlings to have licensing
> issues during their incubator releases
>
> Thanks for pointing this out, Greg. I wasn't aware of this and have always
> had releases fail when we discover licens
Roy said a while ago that for (P)PMC votes, a -1 is a veto. It is basically
saying, "I cannot work with this person". And corollary, "I should not have
to".
Cheers,
-g
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018, 20:54 Hen wrote:
> Interesting.
>
> Foundation-wise, all our votes are Majority Voting (new member vote,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 1:10 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
>...
> For podlings that have an active GitHub through GitBox the implication of
> this step is that the IPMC will now have control of the GitHub auth.
>
> (1) What needs to be done to the archive to make it clear that the podling
> is retired? S
Please file an INFRA ticket, and we'll create the svn area for the podling,
and apply the right permissions.
Cheers,
Greg Stein
InfraAdmin, ASF
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:19 AM Huxing Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to store some private information for Dubbo(incubating)
&g
Example: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14329
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:22 AM Greg Stein wrote:
> Please file an INFRA ticket, and we'll create the svn area for the
> podling, and apply the right permissions.
>
> Cheers,
> Greg Stein
> InfraAdmin, ASF
>
&
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 9:35 PM Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 1:10 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> >...
>
>> For podlings that have an active GitHub through GitBox the implication of
>> this step is that the IPMC will now have control of the GitHub auth.
>>
&
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 8:22 PM Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 5:33 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> > Hi -
> >
> > ...
> > > Possibly retirement?
> > > ODF toolkit (7 years in the incubator!)
> >
> > I’ve discussed this some on the ODF toolkit dev list. Development was
> > recently moved
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 8:01 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
>...
> In the past we typically shied away from setting deadlines for certain
> milestones in community development within podlings. This, in my view,
> somewhat encouraged this phenomenon of an "eternal podling" (active
> enough not to be i
Slack has no F/OSS discounts, but they *do* have a discount for charities
like the ASF. The ASF has not (yet) chosen to purchase a license, though,
as we encourage mailing lists rather than synchronous chat services. We
also want the discussions *recorded* on ASF hardware for archival/review
purpos
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 7:08 PM Greg Stein wrote:
>
> > Slack has no F/OSS discounts, but they *do* have a discount for charities
> > like the ASF. The ASF has not (yet) chosen to purchase a license, though,
> > as we encourage mailing lists rather than synchronous chat
On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 8:04 PM Sid Anand wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> Interesting. I just tried that and was shown "airflow is already taken by a
> channel, user, or user group".
>
Seems somebody in your community already set it up?
> However, apache-airflow is available.
>
Why create something new, i
yone can register an account on this
> slack workspace using any email account (e.g. does not need to be
> Apache.org emails)? Is that correct?
>
> -s
>
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 6:32 PM Greg Stein wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 8:04 PM Sid Anand wrote:
> >
&
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 5:30 PM P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> Aren’t the foundation-level bylaws about how the ASF operates as a
> non-profit business?
>
There are two types of "bylaws" at the Foundation level. The official ones
you're referring to, and the project ones under dev/ (the "how it works"
hehe.. and I agree with both of you :-)
But when the concept of "foundation-level project bylaws" came up, that is
where they are. Not labeled as such, not explained well, etc. Agreed. Yet
conceptually, those are the "default project bylaws" should a PMC not
decide to write up something else.
We'
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 2:18 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
>...
> For IPMC members who are unable to be a mentor I’m curious to know what
> the reasons are, I’m sure that “not having the time" is probably the number
> one reason, but are is there any thing else stopping member (in particular
> first ti
esn't touch the code repository.
Probot Stale has been enabled for Airflow.
Cheers,
Greg Stein
Infrastructure Administrator, ASF
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 7:47 PM Sid Anand wrote:
> Ismael,
> Thanks for this pointer. I've re-opened my INFRA ticket and referenced your
> Apache
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:25 PM Julian Hyde wrote:
>...
> As a reviewer, how am I to vote on this release candidate?
You do NOT vote on binary artifacts. Since you cannot release binaries, you
should not put the Foundation's imprimatur on those artifacts (and as PMC
Member, that is what your v
releases.
>
> When reviewing binary archives we need to make sure that the license file
> is updated with the shiped dependencies licenses appropriately and that
> they are all compatible with the Apache License (notice file might also
> need to be updated).
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 2
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 12:25 PM Julian Hyde wrote:
> Jim, you’re re-iterating the premise of my question. In the context of my
> question, it doesn’t matter what these things are called. But we need to
> know how reviewers are to handle them.
>
> Since I asked the original question, I have found
If they didn't graduate, then they aren't Apache projects. So as Myrle
says, "what are they doing on our servers?" For the retired podlings, our
copy of their code could be misleading, relative to where it came from, or
where the community may have newly forked it.
Not an Infra opinion,
-g
On Mo
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 3:21 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> -0 (binding) - This podling has never completed a suitable podling name
> search. It seems that people no longer consider that relevant as it is not
> in the Maturity model and I’m not sure why. It could be because that is
> ComDev and not the
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:06 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hey just because there is a restaurant chain called Cava does not mean
> that a software project called Cava is not suitable.
>
> BTW Cava is Spanish Sparkling Wine - it is like Champagne but made with
> Spanish varietals. [1]
>
I read it as: i
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:48 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
> > On Feb 6, 2019, at 6:16 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:06 PM Dave Fisher
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey just because there is a restaurant chain called Cava does not mean
>
Hehe... I think she just said "patches welcome" 😋
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019, 08:19 Myrle Krantz I have no objections to you editing that into it. I do however think it's
> important to explain the reasons for the rules together with the rules.
>
> Please note that I've mentioned legal jeopardy, so if
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 12:42 PM Markus Weimer wrote:
>...
> === Meritocracy ===
>
> The TVM stack began as a research project of the SAMPL group at Paul G.
> Allen
> School of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Washington. The
> project
> is now driven by an open source community invo
701 - 800 of 929 matches
Mail list logo
