On Apr 14, 2004, at 6:11 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
I was also thinking of approaching JetBrains for IDEA licenses for
our group as well.
hehehe. do ask for an ASF-wide license too ;)
JetBrains did extend a free (for non-commercial use) license to all Ant
committers. I use it every waking moment!
E
+1 from me too, of course :)
The search.apache.org proposal is forthcoming. I've drafted it at:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/TopLevelProposal
I'll propose this to the Jakarta PMC in a day or so after we have a
chance for others to comment.
The link between Nutch and search.apach
On Dec 21, 2004, at 4:06 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Yep. However, the Apache 4.0 License ( in (1) scope of the subprojects
)
disturbs me. :-)
Corrected!
Erik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additiona
l indexing functionality so that Lucene4c can stand
alone, without the use of another Lucene implementation for
bootstrapping.
The project would be part of the new Lucene top leve project, and Erik
Hatcher has offerred to serve as a sponsor.
While I have yet to expand the community of develope
quot;Lucene4c"
geir
On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:59 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
I presume this codebase is substantial enough that it requires
incubation? Or because it was a single developer, could he
contribute it directly to the Lucene project and bypass incubation?
Erik
On Feb 14, 2
The Lucene PMC has unanimously voted to accept the Lucene4c codebase.
Let's bring it into incubation!
What's next?
Erik
On Feb 17, 2005, at 2:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 17, 2005, at 11:30 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
It seems that the best course of action is for the Lucene PMC to vot
On Feb 21, 2005, at 5:46 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
The Lucene PMC has unanimously voted to accept the Lucene4c codebase.
Let's bring it into incubation!
What's next?
I figure this probably fell off most people's radar over the weekend,
but just so there's
If there are things that I can do to give Garrett karma or update the
website, let me know. I'm not quite sure how I fit in and what powers
I have to push things without assistance.
Thanks,
Erik
On Feb 24, 2005, at 7:21 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Erik Hatcher
At least two of the developers (myself and Brian McCallister) for the
port of the Java Lucene to Ruby are already official Apache committers.
Brian is new to the Lucene development community, but a seasoned
Apache guy.
My preference would be to get the other developers as committers to a
/rub
Again, please move this thread to the repository@ list. Thank you!
Erik
On May 3, 2005, at 6:07 PM, Jeffrey Liu wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the clarification. If I understand it correctly, this means
potentially I can put plugin distributions into this repository,
host a
site.xml file somewhe
On May 6, 2005, at 7:16 PM, Danese Cooper wrote:
Not that I get to vote...but I have been stumping for this for 6+
years, so...
++1
Danese
On Danese's tail... +1 from me.
Erik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Not sure if my vote counts since I'm on the Lucene PMC, but ...
+1
Erik
On May 18, 2005, at 2:11 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1
On 5/18/05, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I believe that Nutch has met all of the requirements for graduation.
Nutch has an active, diverse developer communi
George - I'm bringing this issue to the incubator list. I've not
been very actively involved in the Incubator, and I got an error
trying to commit the new directory you request.
$ svn add lucene.net/
A lucene.net
~/dev/asf/incubator erik$ svn commit -m "add lucene.net directory"
svn:
So how does this work? Does the incubator also need to vote on this
or is it accepted for incubation based on the Lucene PMC vote?
I'm +1, for the record :)
Erik
On Jan 3, 2006, at 10:19 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Hello Incubator PMC folks,
I would like to propose a new Apache proje
That's a good policy, Brian.
+1 myself, as I do plan to work with Solr.
Erik
On Jan 10, 2006, at 8:48 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
+0 (would be +1 but I am trying not to +1 anything which I cannot
commit time to help with)
I will use it, though =)
-Brian
On Jan 10, 2006, at 1:3
Sorry 'bout that. I had done the proper thing and created an XML
file and generated the HTML and committed both yesterday, but I had
not yet updated the site where a hand-made HTML file had been put
erroneously. Thanks for taking care of it, and I apologize for the
inconvenience.
I thought I set all the basics up for this weeks ago, George. I
haven't had a chance to look at the specifics, but the .xml files you
need to edit should be there. Use the build process to
generate .html. Do not edit .html directly, only the .xml files.
And use svn on the apache servers
My apologies if this sounded overly harsh George and I did
correspond back and forth privately while I got some things
configured and the site published, and he probably did reply to my
mail instructions on the process.
Erik
On Apr 11, 2006, at 4:01 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
I
On Apr 11, 2006, at 4:29 PM, George Aroush wrote:
Btw, Lucene.Net is been referred to as "Lucene.Net" and not
"Lucene.NET"
Noel suggested so some time ago to prevent any legal issues with
Microsoft.
I'm a bit shocked that capitalization matters. I helped write (award
winning!) Windows NT
I'm +1 as well. Since the paperwork and administrative overhead
takes a while, I encourage Jeff to get the ball rolling submitting a
CLA right away, as we discuss (if needed) the process and acceptance
of Jeff as a Lucene.Net committer. Should be no problem. We need
more committers on Lu
Yes, I added that wiki piece for Lucene.Net. Please refine it as
desired.
I'm not clear on your timeline below... when you re-released 1.3-rc3,
that was with Pasha's codebase, right? And what about 1.4-alpha -
was any of that code from Pasha, or was it a from-scratch creation by
you?
.
Regards,
-- George
-Original Message-----
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 7:06 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene.Net
Yes, I added that wiki piece for Lucene.Net. Please refine it as
desired.
I'm not clear on your
+1
Erik
On Sep 25, 2007, at 1:20 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the
proposed Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad
interest in this project, which bodes well for its ability to build
a diverse developer community
What do you have in mind with lucene4c? That project was closed
down a while ago. There is also the goal of Lucy http://
lucene.apache.org/lucy/ that hasn't materialized yet either.
Erik
On Sep 26, 2007, at 9:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All!
We're interested to follow th
+1
On Oct 29, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
Hi,
Following up on the proposal discussed at [1] I'd like to call for
a vote to
incubate Buildr. Buildr is a simple and intuitive build system for
Java
projects written in Ruby (and based on Rake), please see the complete
proposal text
To second a previous message. JRuby is quite good already, and
getting better every day. Having JRuby tie to Ant's API through the
elegance of Rake would be awesome.
Erik
On Oct 29, 2007, at 7:20 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
+1
For what it is worth, I heard a lot of comments abou
On Oct 30, 2007, at 9:23 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
Good to see some Ruby code coming into the foundation, even if it is
for compiling Java.
There's Ruby code under Solr:
* solr-ruby: Ruby API to Solr
* Flare: Ruby on Rails plugin using solr-ruby to present a faceted UI.
A coupl
+1
On Nov 28, 2007, at 7:59 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007.
[ ] +1 Accept Shindig for incubation
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason :
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
+1
On Feb 9, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages
of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we
proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors.
Now it is time to vote on the proposal which
On Feb 22, 2008, at 7:52 AM, Santiago Gala wrote:
El vie, 22-02-2008 a las 09:34 +0100, Endre Stølsvik escribió:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Another option might be to take the code somewhere else for a while,
work on it, gather a community and come back to the incubator
when the
project ha
I was away at ApacheCon (with fairly lousy 'net access, sadly)... I
just updated Lucene.Net's April report.
Erik
On Apr 13, 2008, at 7:02 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
I reviewed the submitted project reports for April. I'm not sure if
people are actively following the page or the dif
166M/x1/www/incubator.apache.org/lucene.net
i've just removed some (large) old docs.
Erik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
On Aug 4, 2008, at 1:48 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Please vote on accepting Tashi into the Incubator.
Tashi's proposal is at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TashiProposal
Thanks!
Doug
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P
On Oct 2, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Please vote on accepting Droids into incubation.
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 from me as well.
Erik
On Nov 6, 2008, at 2:15 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Alex Boisvert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Buildr community is requesting to graduate from the incubator
as a
top-level project. We've recently held a
[ X ] +1 Approve gra
I'm going to check on DIGY's and the Doug and Dave too... will do that
Monday morning and get the account creation process rolling for them
too.
Erik
On Nov 9, 2008, at 6:32 PM, George Aroush wrote:
Hi folks,
Isik Yigit (aka: DIGY @ Lucene.Net who was recently voted in as
commit
I have requested accounts for both Digy and Doug. My mistake, Dave
isn't yet proposed as a committer.
Erik
On Nov 9, 2008, at 7:47 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
I'm going to check on DIGY's and the Doug and Dave too... will do
that Monday morning and get the account c
I believe the next step is for you to be added to those with write
rights on that svn tree. I'm not sure who's in charge of that
particular piece if it is under Lucene then Doug can do it,
otherwise the incubator PMC can do it somehow.
Erik
On May 10, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Jeff R
+1
On Sep 26, 2006, at 7:17 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
issues addressed in this release:
1. updated proposal included
2. The first paragraph explains it to a layperson
3. OASIS issue addressed
[ ] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the fol
I didn't specify as such with my vote, but I believe my +1 was
binding as well.
Erik
On Oct 3, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Ian Holsman wrote:
On 03/10/2006, at 7:32 PM, Mads Toftum wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 12:09:24PM +1000, Ian Holsman wrote:
I hope I get this part of process correc
+1
Sorry to see Lucene4c go dormant, but here's to the success of Lucy!
Erik
On Oct 9, 2006, at 11:34 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Since there hasn't been any significant work on Lucene4c in quite some
time, I'd like to officially mark it as dormant so I don't have to
keep writing board
apache.org/lucene.net/
I be happy to do this myself if someone will tell me where to find
the
page to http://lucene.apache.org/ -- of course, I am assuming it's OK
to do this link change.
Regards,
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon
+1 (binding)
On Oct 23, 2006, at 2:03 PM, Xavier Hanin wrote:
Hi All,
After several weeks of discussion with our user community [1] and with
several Apache members, I am proud to present a proposal [2] for
the open
source project Ivy to join the Apache Incubator.
I and all the Ivy team an
On Oct 23, 2006, at 6:50 PM, david reid wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
+1 (binding)
Forgive my ignorance, but what does "+1 (binding)" mean?
see here:
<http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html>
On Oct 23, 2006, at 7:24 PM, david reid wrote:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
it's a hint that the voter is a pmc member.
*sigh*
Really, no, seriously, you're telling me that the PMC can't be trusted
to count votes from it's members and others it feels are qualified?
It's surely easier to count t
+1
On Dec 19, 2006, at 6:45 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
The Solr community has voted to release apache-solr-1.1.0-incubating
We now ask the Incubator PMC to approve this release.
Artifacts for release:
http://people.apache.org/~yonik/solr/staging_area/1.1/CHANGES.txt
http://people.apache.org/~yon
On Jan 12, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
The Solr podling is therefore requesting to graduate from the
Incubator to become an Apache Lucene subproject.
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On Mar 10, 2007, at 10:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+11Mar07:
+ - Release: Apache Lucene.Net.2.0 build 004 "final"
George - Again I have to claim being lame on the specifics here, but
what vote passed a "final" release? I believe you should be calling
anything at best a "release
On Mar 15, 2007, at 9:23 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Two parts to the vote:
ONE: Should Incubator tarballs go in the normal place (and thus
mirrors).
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
-1
TWO: Should there be an Incubator maven repository.
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
+0 (who cares about maven? ;)
pursuing eternal enli
I'll chime in here to lend some support to George and echo what was
said earlier on this thread... having others sign your key is not a
necessity for making a release (at least within any policies I've
seen). Is there such a policy? If not, let's let George move on
with the next steps in
I've waited out on the vote intentionally to see what others hand.
The licensing issues that RAT turned up seem minor to me, especially
being in project files that are not part of a binary distribution and
probably not even needed for compilation of the codebase in general.
So...
+1 on
51 matches
Mail list logo
