OURCES TO BE CREATED =
* None. (Struts Action SVN module and build systems already exist.)
= INITIAL COMMITTERS =
* Jason Carreira (jcarreira at apache.org)
* Don Brown (mrdon at apache.org)
* Rene Gielen
* Rainer Hermanns
* Ted Husted (husted at apache.org)
* Toby Jee
* Patrick Li
I forgot to include the Struts Sponsor results...
Binding PMC votes:
- Don Brown +1
- Martin Cooper +1
- Ted Husted +1
- Craig McClanahan +1
- Wendy Smoak +1
- Joe Germuska +1
- James Mitchell +1
- Niall Perberton +1
- James Holmes +1
- Hubert Rabago +1
Non-binding:
- Gary VanMatre
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 13:18, Don Brown wrote:
= RESOURCES TO BE CREATED =
* None. (Struts Action SVN module and build systems already exist.)
Resources are indeed needed, as the incubatee will not be homed in the "target
PMC" until after graduation.
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Howdy,
I like this as both a WebWork user and with my Apache hat on.
WebWork 2 will form the base of Struts Action 2.0 and is under heavy
active development.
Just out of curiosity, how soon are you hoping to make a release out
of the incubator?
We'd like to get an alpha
king with everyone,
Don
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:18:04PM -0800, Don Brown wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WebWork2Proposal
- LSD
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comm
about new mentors in some easy way.
For example there's this account request from Don Brown
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from today - it's not easily possible to find out
if he is supposed to be in charge of that - there's nothing on the PMC
list and there's just one vote thread
To explain further, WebWork will form the core of Struts Action 2. We
decided to go the Incubator route for two reasons:
1. The code has minor LGPL deps that we'll need to clean
2. We want to bring in a number of new developers
Since this project is central to the future of Struts (Struts Actio
In the WebWork2 podling, we have several files that contain a copyright
header naming the file as belonging to the ePlus corporation. Turns out,
this copyright was mistakenly applied due a developer's mistaken IDEA
configuration, which was set to add that copyright to every new file. That
develop
That is my understanding, yes. Simply a misconfiguration of IDEA.
Don
On 4/5/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Don,
>
> To be clear, are you indicating that the copyright notice is simply
> entirely
> false, the notice was erroneously placed, and that the named entity has no
> c
I'd like to get the WebWork 2 podling out of incubation and into Struts, but
I have some questions to help determine if the requirements have been met.
1. Does all Java code have to use the ASF copyright header? We have some
files that have a "NanoContainer Organization" copyright, with an
ASF-d
On 4/19/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is obviously not an open source license (eg strange limitations on
> redistribution, no license to create derivative works, bla bla). We
> obviously want to share this code with others under the terms of an open
> source license. So you sho
The Apache Struts PMC has voted to accept the graduation of WebWork 2
from the Incubator.
Initial vote:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/struts-dev/200604.mbox/ajax/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Vote result:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/struts-dev/200605.mbox/ajax/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
On 5/2/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Don,
"All those issues have been resolved, but are not listed specifically in
that status page."
Please do. And have all of Martin's issues also been cleared?
I added the specific IP tasks we accomplished. As I later in that
thread, I in
+1
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Nicholas L Gallardo
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc: Bryant Luk ; Christopher J Blythe
>> ; Dust
I also have a full backup, in case one of your templates was lost, for
some reason. Even if it wasn't, there are UI changes in this rather
large upgrade of Confluence so you'll probably need tweaking
regardless.
Don
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Bertrand
Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi Dick,
>
> On S
but if
you don't get a response on a wiki admin, try the infra list, irc
channel, or general harassment of the incubator PMC :)
Don
> Since I don't have admin rights any more for the wiki, some nice admin
> is going to have to add the code to the new export template.
>
>
The vote to graduate the WebWork 2 Podling to Struts PMC has passed.
The following Incubator PMC members have voted:
Don Brown +1
Ted Husted +1
Martin Cooper +1
Noel Bergman +1
Jim Jagielski +1
Therefore, I will begin the graduation tasks as described in the
policy document.
Initial Struts
This has my hearty +1! This is great news as I've always admired the
framework and the community behind it, and this will further
facilitate the inter-framework discussions we (Struts) has been
periodically having with Wicket.
Let me know of any way I can help,
Don
On 7/26/06, Upayavira <[EMAI
+1
On 8/24/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/24/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, please cast your votes:
>
> [X] +1 Accept Wicket as an Incubator podling
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason
On 9/28/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 28, 2006, at 9:20 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> I took the liberty of looking at the Struts 2 release, and they don't
> have license headers in the aforementioned files.
That's a Bad Thing(tm).
Tattletale! :)
Don
LSD
--
Agreed. I don't think it is fair to be making up graduation
requirements right when a project is about to graduate. If we are to
require a project to go through an Incubation process, that process
should be well-defined and not constantly changing based on the whims
of Incubation members. That
hman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 19 October 2006 02:14, Don Brown wrote:
> I don't think it is fair to be making up graduation
> requirements right when a project is about to graduate.
Can you please be more specific. Which requirements have been mad up on the
spot jus
What exactly makes something a part of the "official" ASF
infrastructure? I thought it was that a member of Infrastructure had
volunteered to maintain it, and if that's the case, Confluence is
indeed a part of the "official" ASF infrastructure since I, as a
member of ASF and Infrastructure, have
I'm willing to write whatever docs or build whatever
team size infrastructure feels necessary to ensure Confluence is
well-supported.
Don
On 11/9/06, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 9, 2006, at 10:52 AM, Don Brown wrote:
> What exactly makes something a part of
+1
On 5/25/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 25 May 2007 00:46, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
[x] +1 Recommend to the board to establish Apache Wicket (binding)
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.c
25 matches
Mail list logo
