I don't think this needs more discussion, but to clarify my comment, it was my impression that requirements, specifically that a release has to be created, were being added to the graduation checklist ad hoc. Some members saw it differently, and view it as more of a discussion item, which in retrospect, may be closer to its intended purpose.
It is my general opinion, having worked in the Incubator for some time and having mentored a project through it that the Incubator would be best served by a defined process or checklist that guides the graduation process. Without such a process, a graduation vote or discussion could turn into something akin to begging passage from the Nnights of Ni. Apparently, I'm in the minority here, which is fine, but just because I may disagree doesn't mean I'm spreading "FUD" or inexperienced. Don On 10/21/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 19 October 2006 02:14, Don Brown wrote: > I don't think it is fair to be making up graduation > requirements right when a project is about to graduate. Can you please be more specific. Which requirements have been mad up on the spot just for Harmony? Either this is a case of FUD or more likely, not following the overall Incubator discussion, both general and about other podlings... That said, I think Geir is showing remarkable patience and resilience to get this done. Keep up the good work, and show us Harmony in action :o) Cheers Niclas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
