Re: Continuous Build environment?

--- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Brett Porter Blog: http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository

son and your own common sense. -- Buddha - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.e

Re: Continuous Build environment?

have the builds going asap for 1.0.2 integration and testing. i can make do with our internal build for now, so it isn't a crisis, but i would like this process to become more transparent. is possible / practical? thanks, scott out Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Br

Re: Continuous Build environment?

hanks for your patience. Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: gene

Re: Project category Incubator update

Buildr CouchDB Qpid retired/dormant: Depot Heraldry TripleSoup Lucene4c Otherwise looks right - Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incub

Re: Apache Wink Proposal

On 23/04/2009, at 3:59 AM, Peltz, Christopher wrote: Greg - one correction - HP did sign an Apache CLA, so it should say "Yes", next to all HP initial committers. That's not correct - each still requires an individual CLA if they are going to participate in the project. I think you are thi

Re: FW: MODERATE for lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org

What exactly is the problem? I assume you get this in response to trying to accept moderation requests. Do the moderation requests not succeed? What mail client do you use? Did this work before? - Brett On 25/05/06, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi folks, This problem has been happ

Re: Incubator artifacts and repositories

On 17/06/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The repository folks have thus far created several repositories: http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/ http://www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/ http://people.apache.org/repository/ There's also http://people.apache.org/mav

Re: Incubator artifacts and repositories

Hi Noel, I'm expecting you'll probably respond to my other mail too, but I just wanted to pick up on this point. On 17/06/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Distinguishing between what was put out during Incubation and what was put out post-Incubation is a good thing. Why would a

Re: Incubator artifacts and repositories

On 18/06/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That it is now a Apache project and all that comes with that. Changing the label on the web page is not sufficient, as all artifacts contain the "Incubating" disclaimer. Yes, I'm aware of that, and probably should have directly mentioned t

Re: Incubator artifacts and repositories

On 19/06/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yep. I have no problems with that per se. Especially if Maven is a happy fellow with "0.9-incubating-SNAPSHOT" and such... Yep. Also, under the versioning rules: 0.9-incubating-SNAPSHOT < 0.9-incubating < 0.9-SNAPSHOT < 0.9 So even if

Re: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project

What about maintaining both as branches of the CeltiXFire project? - Brett On 01/07/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 - The XFire community will definitely still need the ability to make releases after we graduate. As you said, there are big incompatabile changes (I think of this

Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Change | Re: Important Ch

unsubscribed them... On 12 Jul 2006 23:54:39 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This message is for all users sending submissions to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; ** This address is no longer receiving support or assistance submissions. ** Aanval now requires all support and assistance

Re: [VOTE] CeltiXfire Project Proposal

+1 On 13/07/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, There has been plenty of discussion around the CeltiXfire proposal, we feel that all the issues forwarded have been addressed, and we would now like to officially propose CeltiXfire to the Incubator for consideration. The proposal can

Re: Maven 2 repo for incubating project releases?

So the solution that best corresponds to this is an incubation repository. http://people.apache.org/maven-repository-incubator/ (this could well be incubator.apache.org/maven-repository or whatever) Then: org.apache.activemq activemq 4.0.1-incubated None of this will be uploaded to Ibi

Re: [rant] seperate policy change from proposal discussion

+42 (which, I believe, is also the average number of messages per single thread on this list at the moment). Anyway, I'm definitely in agreement with "versioning" policy. Podlings should comply to the latest agreed set at the time of entry, and then a more recent one on graduation (so even if som

Re: [IVY] setup of infrastructure

On 31/10/06, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Personnally I don't mind, What I like with only one list is that you can easily reply to a commit and discuss it if required. Having two separate lists is more "scalable". If any other one has a preference, it's ok for me. We set the reply-to

Re: [IVY] setup of infrastructure

On 31/10/06, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does Ivy want to import history, or just the latest code? An history import would be nice, but isn't there a problem with legal issues, since old code was not under Apache License? And maybe the easier is just to import latest code (well, I

Re: [IVY] setup of infrastructure

, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Xavier Hanin wrote: >> > On 11/1/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 31/10/06, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > Does Ivy want to i

Re: [VOTE] Retire AltRMI

+1 On 07/11/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The AltRMI podling, has become stagnant. Here is a vote to move it into retirement. [ ] -1 : It lives on, you someone missed my recent commits on it last week [ ] 0 : I don't do fall clea

[PROPOSAL] NMaven podling

Hi, The Maven PMC has voted to accept NMaven for incubation (see <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on [EMAIL PROTECTED]). The full proposal is attached below, and can be viewed here also: http://maven.apache.org/proposals/incubator/nmaven.html I'm posting this here for any feedback or objections from the inc

Re: December 2006 Incubator Reports

I've added the OpenEJB report. Sorry for missing the deadline. On 18/12/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Yes, its that time of the month again, so this should not come as a surprise > to anyone. Reports are due on or by Friday, December 15, 2006 And, onc

Re: March Board reports due

NMaven reported last month, as scheduled. Not on the reporting schedule for March, so I've removed it. On 06/03/07, Adam Lally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/6/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hola podlings, > > This month's ASF Board reports should be written up on the wiki at > h

Re: March Board reports due

4th On 07/03/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: NMaven's still on the first 3 months isn't it? Hen On 3/7/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > NMaven reported last month, as scheduled. Not on the reporting > schedule for March, so I've

Re: [VOTE] Tika - a content analysis toolkit

On 18/03/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [X] +1 Accept Tika as a new podling [ ] -1 Do not accept the new podling (provide reason, please) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail

[proposal] OpenEJB Graduation Proposal

ski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Brett Porter([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Dain Sundstrom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that David Blevins be and hereby is appointed to the office of Vice President, OpenEJB, to serve in accordance with and su

Re: ServiceMix Mentor list

Apologies Noel, I meant to send an explanation and hadn't come back to it yet. I think I was listed in these two files because I was a champion of the original proposal. However, as they came to incubate, I never became a mentor (I've never been on the PPMC list) - and at least at the time there

Re: [proposal] OpenEJB Graduation Proposal

On 03/04/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Brett, Was there a process by which this list of pmc members was arrived at? The group decided, at the start of incubation, to bootstrap the PPMC with just the mentors and have them add PPMC members as a normal PMC would. So those names

Re: ServiceMix Mentor list

On 04/04/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So it was just a coincidence that you happened to look at the file and remove yourself a few hours before a roll call was posted to the PPMC list? Yep - actually, I was looking in incubator-info.txt because of OpenEJB. Thanks, Brett

Re: Question about the PMC structure for graduating projects

On 04/04/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is it appropriate to include those members in the proposal or simply stay with the PPMC and build the new PMC after graduation? Its very easy to do either - the PPMC can vote to add those people to the current PPMC before taking the vote to

[vote] Propose OpenEJB for graduation to a TLP

* Jacek Laskowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Brett Porter([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Dain Sundstrom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that David Blevins be and hereby is appointed to the office of Vice President, OpenEJB, to ser

Re: [vote] Propose OpenEJB for graduation to a TLP

On 24/04/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Brett, What is the diversity of the Committer list and the PMC? There are individuals from >= 3 employers in both committers and the PMC. > the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to > enterprise application and re

Re: [vote] Propose OpenEJB for graduation to a TLP

On 30/04/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is that still true of companies owned by the same entity are counted as one (e.g., IBM, Lotus and Tivoli would count as a single employer)? Yup. - Brett - To unsubscribe

[vote] (repost) Propose OpenEJB for graduation to a TLP

]) * David Jencks([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Jacek Laskowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Brett Porter([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Dain Sundstrom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that David Blevins be appointed to the office

Re: [vote] (repost) Propose OpenEJB for graduation to a TLP

recast IFF it isn't too much trouble or +1 IFF we recast? :D Yes, I'll adjust to the new template before submitting to the board, should the vote pass. - Brett On 03/05/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 However, IFF ("if and only if", for those not posessing a math or logic ba

making project decisions with a small number of PMC members

Hi, Quick question (I hope). I was thinking about what will happen if the NMaven podling would like to add a committer, make a release, etc. Would votes by Maven PMC members (As the sponsoring project) be considered binding in this case, or should we have IPMC members? We currently only have 2

Re: making project decisions with a small number of PMC members

he binding IPMC votes after the PPMC votes, then this is an issue that needs to be addressed. Good luck, Craig On May 15, 2007, at 1:16 AM, Leo Simons wrote: > On May 15, 2007, at 12:26 AM, Brett Porter wrote: >> Quick question (I hope). I was thinking about what will happen if the >>

Re: to brand or not to brand?

As I understand it, you need to call it Apache Ivy on first reference, and mention prominently that it is "currently undergoing incubation at the Apache Software Foundation" (or something like that). - Brett On 22/05/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/22/07, Xavier Hanin <[

Re: [Vote] Accept JRS project for incubation

+1 On 29/06/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have changed the proposal to indicate that initial source will not be made available until the software grant is executed. Other than that, the proposal is unchanged from the original submission. Full text is attached below. Votes, plea

Re: [RESULT]] (repost) Propose OpenEJB for graduation to a TLP

Seems to just have been an issue of updating both websites - it certainly has graduated: http://openejb.apache.org/ I will update both right now. - Brett On 11/07/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sunday 13 May 2007 03:56, Henri Yandell wrote: > This last vote has passed. This

Re: [DISCUSS] Whimsy PMC

e any other thoughts on the matter. > > - Sam Ruby > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Brett Porter http://brettporter.wordpress.com/

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-16) Set Up Mailing LIsts for "ADF Faces" Podling

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-16?page=comments#action_12371921 ] Brett Porter commented on INCUBATOR-16: --- please close as a duplicate > Set Up Mailing LIsts for "ADF Faces&

[jira] Closed: (INCUBATOR-81) Update the Hama incubation status

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brett Porter closed INCUBATOR-81. - Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Brett Porter applied, thanks! > Update the Hama incubat

[jira] Closed: (INCUBATOR-85) Request Mailing lists from INFRA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brett Porter closed INCUBATOR-85. - Resolution: Fixed > Request Mailing lists from IN

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-85) Request Mailing lists from INFRA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12636864#action_12636864 ] Brett Porter commented on INCUBATOR-85: --- just the same addresses as the other

[jira] Closed: (INCUBATOR-102) Remove account from hama project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brett Porter closed INCUBATOR-102. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Brett Porter > Remove account from hama proj

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-24) Setup OpenEJB mailing lists

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-24?page=comments#action_12420211 ] Brett Porter commented on INCUBATOR-24: --- done - David, can you close it? > Setup OpenEJB mailing lists > --- > > Key:

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-23) OpenEJB status page

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-23?page=comments#action_12420212 ] Brett Porter commented on INCUBATOR-23: --- done - David, can you close it? > OpenEJB status page > --- > > Key: INCUBATOR-23 &g

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-24) Setup OpenEJB mailing lists

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-24?page=comments#action_12421484 ] Brett Porter commented on INCUBATOR-24: --- ah, sorry. I didn't realise all the incubator ones were done that way. It seems the majority outsi

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-24) Setup OpenEJB mailing lists

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-24?page=comments#action_12421488 ] Brett Porter commented on INCUBATOR-24: --- ok, can you please reopen it? (I'm going to have to look into what group I actually need to do this on INCU

[jira] Reopened: (INCUBATOR-24) Setup OpenEJB mailing lists

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-24?page=all ] Brett Porter reopened INCUBATOR-24: --- Assignee: Brett Porter seems I had two accounts and added the group to the wrong one > Setup OpenEJB mailing li

<    1   2