Hi,
> For [1], I think we need to remove it. For [2] I have raised on legal via
> JIRA[3].
Thanks. It would be nice to know why this happened, and depending on that
answer there may be more work to do to get the LICENSE into shape. I’m guessing
that teh project may of added all dependancies to
Hi Justin,
It’s added in this PR[1] which is trying to improve our LICENSE file. A
bunch of submodules were also added and we are aware we should only include
those bundled in source release.
I have verified all license in the top level LICENSE file are included in
source release except this MKL B
Hi,
> It’s added in this PR[1] which is trying to improve our LICENSE file.
Thanks for that.
> I have verified all license in the top level LICENSE file are included in
> source release except this MKL BLAS license.
I run the release through Fossology [1] and did some spot checks (not an
exha
Hi,
I don’t rally care what they are called but I would suggest that we use
- Keep the existing one called as it is
- Name the new one something like DISCLAIMER-PERMISSIVE, DISCLAIMER-ISSUES,
DISCLAIMER-INITIAL, or DISCLAIMER-PROGRESS
The name may be a bit long but I think it needs to clearly in
