Hi folks!
Thanks for all the feedback and on the additional mentor; I think the proposal
is ready to go to a vote now.
Presuming folks don't have any last minute questions, I'll post it later today.
-busbey
On 2017-05-23 19:52 (-0500), Kostas Sakellis wrote:
> Thank you John for the feedback
Thank you for the guidance, Sebb. I will remove all of them once Apache
Tephra 0.12.0-incubating version is released.
Thanks,
Gokul
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:10 AM, sebb wrote:
> Please remember to delete the superseded releases from
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/teph
Hi all,
After bring open for over 72 hours, the vote for releasing Apache Tephra
0.12.0-incubating passed with 3 binding +1s and no 0 or -1.
Binding +1s:
Alan Gates
James Taylor
John D. Ament
Thanks,
Gokul
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Gokul Gunasekaran
wrote:
> Thank you for the guidance,
Hi John/Sam,
Thanks for your response. Will rectify the identified issues on [1] and get
back on this thread once done.
Thanks
Suma
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Hemanth Yamijala
wrote:
> Sam / John,
>
> Thank you for your responses. Given the extended holiday in US, we
> request some time
Billie,
Thanks for the response, it helps give some more context. I also like
Josh's email. It probably better describes my point of view. I also
selfishly don't want the incubator to be stuck with many podlings that we
already know what's going to happen with.
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:50
+1 [binding]
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 04:56PM, FENG, Xixuan (Aaron) wrote:
> Greetings IPMC!
>
> The discussion seems to have died down, so I'm calling the
> vote: I propose that we graduate Apache MADlib from the Incubator.
> The full text of the proposal is below. The discuss thread can be fou
+1 (loiterer)
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> +1 [binding]
>
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 04:56PM, FENG, Xixuan (Aaron) wrote:
> > Greetings IPMC!
> >
> > The discussion seems to have died down, so I'm calling the
> > vote: I propose that we graduate Apache MADlib from
Hi all,
Normally a vote for a release is open for 72 hours. If we don't get enough
vote to (less than 3 buindings) in this time do we simply extend the vote,
or do we cancel it?
Regards, Raphael
--
My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
--
Hi,
> Normally a vote for a release is open for 72 hours. If we don't get enough
> vote to (less than 3 buindings) in this time do we simply extend the vote, or
> do we cancel it?
It’s a minimum of 72 hours it stays open until you get enough votes. No need to
cancel it.
Thanks,
Justin
---
With 5 +1 binding votes, 2 +1 non-bidning votes and 0 votes
of any other kind this vote PASSES. Thanks to everyone who
voted. The voting tally can be seen below:
+1 binding:
John D. Ament
Jim Jagielski
P. Taylor Goetz
Roman Shaposhnik
Konstantin Boudnik
+1 non-binding:
Pie
I give my +1 here
Am .05.2017, 11:23 Uhr, schrieb sospartan :
Hi IPMC,
I'm calling a vote for Weex-incubating 0.12.0-RC4 release.
In this release, source tarball only include files necessary to build
Weex
SDK.
All binaries were excluded.
A build README(README_RELEASE.md) is in the tarball
Hi Justin
Am .05.2017, 04:38 Uhr, schrieb Justin Mclean :
Hi,
Normally a vote for a release is open for 72 hours. If we don't get
enough vote to (less than 3 buindings) in this time do we simply extend
the vote, or do we cancel it?
It’s a minimum of 72 hours it stays open until you get e
12 matches
Mail list logo