[jira] [Updated] (INCUBATOR-139) Test ticket for Apache Incubator Logo Contest submissions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bertrand Delacretaz updated INCUBATOR-139: -- Summary: Test ticket for Apache Incubator Logo Contest submissions (was: Apa

Re: board comments on incubator

Within each of the podlings there is one question that should be raised regularly (annually, quarterly, monthly, whatever): 'are we mature enough to graduate?'. And this question can be raised by anyone participating (Mentors, PPMC Members, non-privileged contributors). But, even if that occurs re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.5.0 (incubating)

+1 > On Dec 20, 2016, at 12:42 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> Nazeer: Sure I will move them as suggested. > > Up to you, but I’d leave the LIENSE and NOTICE in the war file and make > copies of them at the top level. > > Thanks, > Justin > --

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.5.0 (incubating)

> On Dec 19, 2016, at 8:46 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Hi, > > So to point out, release vote threads are open *at least* 72 hours. There > is no reason to add an extra 48 hours to the vote, it'll close when it > passes That's not quite 100% true... The vote doesn't "auto-close" once the requ

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.5.0 (incubating)

+1 (binding) > On Dec 19, 2016, at 3:33 AM, Nazeer Shaik wrote: > > Hi all, > > We are extending voting time for another 48 hrs as we didn't get any > response. Request you to review and vote for this release. > > Thanks, > Nazeer > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Nazeer Shaik > wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.5.0 (incubating)

Thank you Jim for reviewing and up voting the release. FYI: The release is already announced :-) Thanks, Nazeer Thanks, Nazeer *Principal Architect, **Conflux Technologies Pvt Ltd * *Address*: #304, 2nd Floor, 7th Main Road, HRBR Layout 1st Block, Bengaluru,

Re: board comments on incubator

On Dec 22, 2016 3:35 AM, "Pierre Smits" wrote: But, even if that occurs regularly, there are outside forces at play as well. While there is a general consensus within the podling, these outside forces express viewpoints that lead to Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt. This often has more to do with

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.4.0-incubating

+1 (binding) Casting my vote here. Regards JB On 12/21/2016 05:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the Apache Beam, version 0.4.0-incubating, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please p

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.4.0-incubating

Beam has graduated at this point, so I'm not sure why you're voting on a release here. John On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:15 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Casting my vote here. > > Regards > JB > > On 12/21/2016 05:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Ple

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.4.0-incubating

Hi John, as you can see in the original vote e-mail: "* While we are currently in graduation discussions, I think it makes sense to make this incubating release anyway. It significantly improves getting started experience for our users, and we’d like to have it released by the time any potential

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.4.0-incubating

The problem is that at this point, the IPMC is absolved of Beam's actions. Our votes are not binding. Its similar to feedback I gave to Mark B when Geode was graduating and they wanted to add a new committer - just wait a couple of days. Your votes are binding now, so you have no dependency on th

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.4.0-incubating

Valid point. It means that we can proceed with 0.4.0-incubating release (without IPMC vote). Agree ? Regards JB On 12/22/2016 04:50 PM, John D. Ament wrote: The problem is that at this point, the IPMC is absolved of Beam's actions. Our votes are not binding. Its similar to feedback I gave t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.4.0-incubating

I personally would re-roll to drop -incubating and vote on it on your dev list. John On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:06 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Valid point. > > It means that we can proceed with 0.4.0-incubating release (without IPMC > vote). Agree ? > > Regards > JB > > On 12/22/2016 04:50

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.5.0 (incubating)

Yeah, I just wanted it on the record :) > On Dec 22, 2016, at 7:56 AM, Nazeer Shaik > wrote: > > Thank you Jim for reviewing and up voting the release. > FYI: The release is already announced :-) > > Thanks, > Nazeer > > Thanks, > Nazeer > > *Principal Architect, **Conflux Technologies Pvt Lt

[VOTE] Release Apache Streams (incubating) 0.4.1

Hi Incubator PMC,  The Apache Streams community has voted and approved the proposal to release Apache Streams 0.4.1 (incubating). We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members to review and vote on this  incubator release.  0.4.1-incubating is a maintenance release focused on code, documen

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams (incubating) 0.4.1

Moving my vote from dev@streams +1 binding On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:27 PM, sblackmon wrote: > Hi Incubator PMC, > > The Apache Streams community has voted and approved the proposal to > release Apache Streams 0.4.1 (incubating). > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members to review and

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.4.0-incubating

My advice: Drop the -incubating. Vote on your dev@ list. The incubator is done with you. ;-) Craig > On Dec 22, 2016, at 8:06 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Valid point. > > It means that we can proceed with 0.4.0-incubating release (without IPMC > vote). Agree ? > > Regards > JB > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Ratis for Apache Incubator (Was: Concur for Apache Incubator)

FYI, Jing Zhao and I just have finished removing hadoop dependency from the non-hadoop modules. We will continue working on the documentations. Thanks. Tsz-Wo On 12/16/16, 4:27 PM, "Tsz Sze" wrote: +1 Ratis sounds great! BTW, I am working on removing Apache Hadoop dependency (ex