IPMC Community
We've been advised to cancel this vote since our PPMC vote was less than
the minimum voting window of 72 hours. We will resubmit a VOTE to the IPMC
community once the voting window of 72 hours has elapsed and we have a vote
that passes.
Thanks
Kam
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 8:08 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Ok, now I'm a bit confused. I'll try my best to state my points of
> clarification in line.
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 7:37 PM Christopher wrote:
>
>> I also wish to point out that the FluoProposal (
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FluoP
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 9:36 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> I'm -1 until the website issues are resolved.
>
> - Make sure its clear that any existing releases are not apache endorsed.
One interesting thing this discussion has highlighted that we didn't
realize was the following :
1. Releases of Fluo
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Keith Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 9:36 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>> I'm -1 until the website issues are resolved.
>>
>> - Make sure its clear that any existing releases are not apache endorsed.
>
> One interesting thing this discussion has highlighted th
Hi general@incubator.apache.org,
Apparently I thoroughly fat-fingered my initial mail and sent to
APACHE.INCUBATOR.org instead of the correct domain.
There are several IPMC members on the Beam-dev list (which was CC'ed) who
thought I had correctly started the vote, but of course I had not.
I thin
Hi Justin,
Thank you for catching that, We would fix those issues you mentioned, Thanks.
Best Regards
+Gary
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 5:17 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apa
Hi Justin and Apache Beam team,
I'm so Sorry, It is my bad, please ignore my previous mail, Thanks.
Best Regards
+Gary
-Original Message-
From: Wang, Gang1 [mailto:gang1.w...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 10:42 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Relea
Hi all,
After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing Apache
Mnemonic 0.2.0-incubating passed with 5 binding +1s, 4 non-binding +1s and no 0
or -1.
*Binding votes +1s:*
Patrick Hunt (phunt)
Henry Saputra (hsaputra)
Gangumalla, Uma (umamahesh)
Justin Mclean (justin)
John
Mentor here catching up on things here after being offline for a week...
Wow. This rather blew up! A couple of things I wanted to say, in
addition to an ACK that this mentor is paying attention (as much as the
email backlog is caught up, anyways).
- I think there is a very fair point brought
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:57 PM Josh Elser wrote:
> Mentor here catching up on things here after being offline for a week...
>
> Wow. This rather blew up! A couple of things I wanted to say, in
> addition to an ACK that this mentor is paying attention (as much as the
> email backlog is caught up,
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> - I think there is a very fair point brought up by Craig/Justin/John at
> the gray line between "Apache Fluo" and "fluo.io". However, I will say
> that I do *not* think this is remotely close to the level that we've
> seen in other TLPs as of l
Thanks for the review Justin and the website notes.
Dan already created the corresponding Jira, we gonna fix that asap.
Regards
JB
On 08/02/2016 02:17 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- file name contains incubating
- signature and hash good
- LICENSE and NOTICE good. (Al
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Dan Halperin
wrote:
>
> Apparently I thoroughly fat-fingered my initial mail and sent to
> APACHE.INCUBATOR.org instead of the correct domain.
>
wow, I didn't realize about the mistake either...
Sergio, would you mind re-sending your response to the correct list?
13 matches
Mail list logo
