This vote passes with 4 binding "+1" votes, no "0" notes, and 2 "-1"
binding votes. Despite the negative votes, we will release and fix the L/N
files in the next release and try to clarify the README. It is very
important to get this 2.4.4 release out ASAP.
Thanks to all voters!
2015-07-13 10:33
Hi,
> This vote passes with 4 binding "+1" votes, no "0" notes, and 2 "-1"
> binding votes.
If you read carefully I think you find there were 3 -1 votes on the binary
releases.
> It is very important to get this 2.4.4 release out ASAP.
Given that the changes were not major and could of been qu
2015-07-16 10:41 GMT+02:00 Justin Mclean :
> Hi,
>
> > This vote passes with 4 binding "+1" votes, no "0" notes, and 2 "-1"
> > binding votes.
>
> If you read carefully I think you find there were 3 -1 votes on the binary
> releases.
>
Agreed for binaries. However AFAIK, what Apache legally cares
Le 16/07/15 10:41, Justin Mclean a écrit :
> Hi,
>
>> This vote passes with 4 binding "+1" votes, no "0" notes, and 2 "-1"
>> binding votes.
> If you read carefully I think you find there were 3 -1 votes on the binary
> releases.
True. I -1 the binary release. Interesting case : should we release
Hello
The release passes with
4 +1 (binding) votes
0 -1 (binding) votes
Thanks to all who helped make this release possible.
Here is the IPMC vote thread: http://s.apache.org/wp6
+1
On 07/13/2015 06:31 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
+1 binding
For the source releases I checked:
- incubating in artefact name
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- all source files have Apache headers
- no unexpected binaries
- Unable to compile form s
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 16/07/15 10:41, Justin Mclean a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>>> This vote passes with 4 binding "+1" votes, no "0" notes, and 2 "-1"
>>> binding votes.
>> If you read carefully I think you find there were 3 -1 votes on the binary
>> releases.
>
2015-07-16 18:49 GMT+02:00 Roman Shaposhnik :
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
> wrote:
>> Le 16/07/15 10:41, Justin Mclean a écrit :
>>> Hi,
>>>
This vote passes with 4 binding "+1" votes, no "0" notes, and 2 "-1"
binding votes.
>>> If you read carefully I think you
I'm interested in adding my name to the YetusProposal[1] as an
"Additional Interested Contributor".
Can someone please add edit privileges to my account, JoeyEcheverria?
Thanks!
-Joey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Joey Echeverria wrote:
> I'm interested in adding my name to the YetusProposal[1] as an
> "Additional Interested Contributor".
>
> Can someone please add edit privileges to my account, JoeyEcheverria?
Done.
Marvin Humphrey
---
+1 (binding)
have fun
jan i
On Thursday, July 16, 2015, Rich Bowen wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On 07/13/2015 06:31 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> +1 binding
>>
>> For the source releases I checked:
>> - incubating in artefact name
>> - signatures and hashes good
>> - DISCLAIMER exists
>> - LICE
Am 16.07.2015 18:49, schrieb Roman Shaposhnik:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 16/07/15 10:41, Justin Mclean a écrit :
Hi,
This vote passes with 4 binding "+1" votes, no "0" notes, and 2 "-1"
binding votes.
If you read carefully I think you find there were 3 -1
Can someone show me where in the bylaws this dreaded and apparently
mandatory 72+ hour window is?
When last I looked, it was the preferred thing to do in most
circumstances, it was not _MANDATED BY LAW_.
If this issue is as serious as you say it is, fix the minor nits, call a
speedy new vote,
On Thursday, July 16, 2015, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> Am 16.07.2015 18:49, schrieb Roman Shaposhnik:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Le 16/07/15 10:41, Justin Mclean a écrit :
>>>
Hi,
This vote passes with 4 binding "+1" votes, no "0" note
Le 16/07/15 18:49, Roman Shaposhnik a écrit :
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
> wrote:
>> Le 16/07/15 10:41, Justin Mclean a écrit :
>>> Hi,
>>>
This vote passes with 4 binding "+1" votes, no "0" notes, and 2 "-1"
binding votes.
>>> If you read carefully I think you
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Cédric Champeau
wrote:
> Like it or not, it passed the vote.
Given the logistics of rolling another RC (even with a shortened
window) and the urgency of the release due to security issues, I think
this was a decent outcome.
That said, contended release votes are
Le 16/07/15 19:48, Daniel Gruno a écrit :
> Can someone show me where in the bylaws this dreaded and apparently
> mandatory 72+ hour window is?
> When last I looked, it was the preferred thing to do in most
> circumstances, it was not _MANDATED BY LAW_.
Nobody said that. However, I like it when a
Hello,
TinkerPop 3.0.0-incubating has passed VOTE with:
+1 (3 -- Justin, Rich, Jan)
0 (0)
-1 (0)
Thank you,
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On Jul 16, 2015, at 11:25 AM, jan i wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> have fun
> jan i
>
> On Thursday, July 16, 2015, Rich Bowen
IMO, what would really help would be a step-by-step guide to examining a
release for L & N issues. Justin explained part of his technique in this
thread already. The person creating the release artifacts should have a
decent chance at finding these issues before opening any vote thread.
-Alex
O
Hi!
I'd like to nominate Jun Aoki (a committer on Apache Ambari)
for this project. He's done a lot of integration work with testpatch
for Amabri and Geode. He's already committer on Ambari and
thus pretty versed in the Apache Way. What would be the best
way to consider him?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Sat
Le 16/07/15 20:43, Alex Harui a écrit :
> IMO, what would really help would be a step-by-step guide to examining a
> release for L & N issues. Justin explained part of his technique in this
> thread already. The person creating the release artifacts should have a
> decent chance at finding these
What is the "notificati...@yetus.apache.org" list for?
- Henry
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> Hi Folks!
>
> There's a community going through board resolution to move from within
> Hadoop to form a new TLP named Yetus. Due to a request on a private list
> we've made a inc
With the graduation of NiFi I depart, at least for now.
Thanks for all the fish.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hi,
> +1 ! And adding such a tool into rat or whatever would be extremely
> helpful, too...
The “tools” I use generally make a bit of noise and require some interpretation
/ filtering so I’m not sure they could be automated cleanly. One thing rat
might be able to do that I don’t think it curren
Hi Cédric,
let me start with saying that I do appreciate your personal efforts
and the Groovy podling efforts in general. You guys are really
on-boarding quite well and are one of the easiest podling to mentor.
What I felt disappointed about is not that you produced a release
with L&N issues, but
The links for the download will be posted to the website tomorrow morning.
Thanks.
Matt
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Ryan Hendrickson <
rhendrickson.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fantastic! Is this going to hit the download site soon?
> https://nifi.incubator.apache.org/download.html
>
> Ryan
>
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> With the graduation of NiFi I depart, at least for now.
>
> Thanks for all the fish.
Happy trails, Benson! It's always a pleasure.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-
Hello Incubators,
We are happy to announce Blur 0.2.4-incubating is ready for release.
The release artifacts can be found at this location:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/blur/0.2.4-incubating/
The source distribution is provided by:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incub
Hi all,
The Apache Kylin community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Kylin 0.7.2 (incubating), the first release of Apache Kylin.
We already have applied some suggestion
in last vote attempt, please refer to below vote mail thread for detail.
Proposal:
http://s.apache.org/ky
Hi all,
The Apache Lens team is proud to announce the release of Apache Lens
2.2.0-beta-incutaing.
Apache Lens provides an Unified Analytics interface. Lens aims to cut the
Data Analytics silos by providing a single view of data across multiple
tiered data stores and optimal execution environment
My -0 wasn't really reflecting on the quality of the release, but rather an
issue with broken format of the checksum files (which was making the validation
harder) .
I see that the issue is getting addressed for the next release, hence I'm
changing my vote to
+1 (binding)
--
Regards,
Cos
My -0 wasn't really reflecting on the quality of the release, but was rather
about this long standing issue with broken format of the checksum files (which
was making the validation harder) .
I see that the issue is getting addressed for the next release, hence I'm
changing my vote to
+1 (bind
32 matches
Mail list logo
