On Thursday, July 16, 2015, Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> wrote:
> Am 16.07.2015 18:49, schrieb Roman Shaposhnik: > >> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Le 16/07/15 10:41, Justin Mclean a écrit : >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> This vote passes with 4 binding "+1" votes, no "0" notes, and 2 "-1" >>>>> binding votes. >>>>> >>>> If you read carefully I think you find there were 3 -1 votes on the >>>> binary releases. >>>> >>> >>> True. I -1 the binary release. Interesting case : should we release if >>> we have as many -1 than +1 ? >>> >> >> Personally, I'm disappointed in the podling for not taking >> care of feedback that seems really easy to take care of. >> > > but not in time, because the apache process is too slow. What so you > prefer? A unfixed zero-day vulnerability reported against an apache > project, or a podling release which is not 100% according to strict apache > views. We are not a TLP yet after all. > > And this release is a special case. > > That security fix is the only reason why we did want release ASAP. We own > it to the community to be able to react to such things fast. And I really > would not like to explain to our users that we could not do a release, > because of a minor issue. If the apache process would not be so slow, we > would of course have made it different. But waiting another 6 days, while > some will be in holidays already, would have been a problem. Security problems must be dealt with as fast as possible even if it means twisting the apache process. rgds jan i > > bye blackdrag > > -- > Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou > blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
