Re: IP Clearance Questions

2015-04-08 Thread Niclas Hedhman
I would like to bring this question up again. BLOCKER. The http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html document states that *Note:* the grant form *must* be acknowledged before continuing. If the source is referenced by checksum in the grant, commit the canonical tarball

Re: IP Clearance Questions

2015-04-08 Thread jan i
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > I would like to bring this question up again. BLOCKER. > > The http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html > document states that > > > *Note:* the grant form *must* be acknowledged before continuing. If the > source is

Re: IP Clearance Questions

2015-04-08 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Ok, I was more reading it as must be placed into the drop box with the checksum so it can be referenced properly. In any event, I think the text is confusing me quite a bit and would like to know what is 'proper' process for a GitHub project to come in? Does it even make sense when Git has no 'can

Re: IP Clearance Questions

2015-04-08 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Ok, I was more reading it as must be placed into the drop box with the > checksum so it can be referenced properly. > > In any event, I think the text is confusing me quite a bit and would like > to know what is 'proper' process for a GitHub

Re: [PROPOSAL] Climate Model Diagnostic Analyzer

2015-04-08 Thread Michael Joyce
Great proposal Chris. If you're still looking for mentors I would be happy to help out. -- Joyce On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 11:24 AM, jonathon wrote: > On 06/04/15 17:05, James Carman wrote: > > I would love to help out. I don't know much about the problem domain, > > but I am a "sciency" kind of

Re: IP Clearance Questions

2015-04-08 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:05 AM, jan i wrote: > But even so In Corinthia we bended the rules and imported directly into out > git repo. This still ensures a record == initial commit. I trust that Corinthia's actions were reasonable, but "bending the rules" is an approach you might take when the ru

Re: IP Clearance Questions

2015-04-08 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > I would like to bring this question up again. BLOCKER. > > The http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html > document states that > > > *Note:* the grant form *must* be acknowledged before continuing. If the > source

Re: [PROPOSAL] Climate Model Diagnostic Analyzer

2015-04-08 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
Yes, Mike would love for you to help out! Please add yourself as a mentor thank you! ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 9110

Re: [PROPOSAL] Climate Model Diagnostic Analyzer

2015-04-08 Thread Michael Joyce
Sounds great Chris. Thanks much. I'll get myself added in there in just a second. -- Joyce On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Yes, Mike would love for you to help out! > > Please add yourself as a mentor thank you! > > +++

Re: wiki access for ClimateModelDiagnosticAnalyzerProposal

2015-04-08 Thread Nick Burch
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Whitehall, Kim D (398M) wrote: my user account is kimwhitehall Karma granted, good luck with the proposal! Nick - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e

File podling reports next month rather than late

2015-04-08 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > General section looks grand. > > We have a few projects unreported, DataFu, ODF Toolkit, OpenAz. > > I know a bit about Datafu which has been very quiet for some time. > > Who knows more about the others? > > Andrei, Konstantin, Suresh are the

Re: File podling reports next month rather than late

2015-04-08 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:32 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:02 PM Marvin Humphrey > wrote: >> We should feel good about the content of the report for this month -- it >> meets or exceeds our usual standards. However, we've had a few process >> glitches here at the end. >> >

Re: File podling reports next month rather than late

2015-04-08 Thread John D. Ament
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:02 PM Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > General section looks grand. > > > > We have a few projects unreported, DataFu, ODF Toolkit, OpenAz. > > > > I know a bit about Datafu which has been very quiet for some time. > > > >

Re: wiki access for ClimateModelDiagnosticAnalyzerProposal

2015-04-08 Thread Whitehall, Kim D (398M)
Thanks Nick! Best regards, Kim ** Kim Whitehall, Ph.D. Scientific Applications Software Engineer Computer Science for Data Intensive Applications Group (398M) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA

wiki access for ClimateModelDiagnosticAnalyzerProposal

2015-04-08 Thread Whitehall, Kim D (398M)
Hi, my user account is kimwhitehall I would like access to edit the ClimateModelDiagnosticAnalyzerProposal wiki Thanks! Best regards, Kim

Re: IP Clearance Questions

2015-04-08 Thread Alex Harui
On 4/8/15, 11:09 AM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote: >JIRA has been used for this purpose before. However, if we're going to >the >trouble of codifying this process, is there any reason not to `svn mkdir` >the >`donations` directory and use it henceforth? IMO, it would be better to not use SVN. Mos

Re: IP Clearance Questions

2015-04-08 Thread jan i
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:05 AM, jan i > > wrote: > > But even so In Corinthia we bended the rules and imported directly into > out > > git repo. This still ensures a record == initial commit. > > I trust that Corinthia's actions were reasonabl

Re: File podling reports next month rather than late

2015-04-08 Thread Ted Dunning
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Thanks again to everyone who has contributed towards another strong report > from the Incubator this month -- I'm confident that we'll meet the same > standards next month but with smoother running. > Thanks for the help Marvin. The proce