Hello,
TinkerPop Apache Incubator would start off with the minimal number of required
initial committers to get the project underway. These are the individuals who
spend most of the time with TinkerPop and are the ones who will be doing all
heavy lifting to migrate over to ASF. Once we have thi
Hello,
TinkerPop3 is a complete re-write of TinkerPop2 and TP3 does not depend on TP2
in any way. TP3 was started November 2013 (1+ year ago). We have CLAs for every
TP3 contributor. We do not have CLAs for every TP2 contributor.
We are primarily interested in moving forward first with TinkerPo
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Considering that both detailed answers as well and more "philosophical"
> answers don't satisfy, I am at a loss to what approach to try next.
The Board should endorse a document establishing what Apache expects of
its projects.
This docum
Hi Justin,
Thank you for the feedback.
I will add the DISCLAIMER, update the year in the NOTICE file, and delete
the HEADER file. I will create a new RC and restart the vote.
I cced dev@reef.
Thanks.
-Gon
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The release is missing D
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Considering that both detailed answers as well and more "philosophical"
>> answers don't satisfy, I am at a loss to what approach to try next.
>
> The Board should endorse a docum
HI,
> I will add the DISCLAIMER, update the year in the NOTICE file, and delete
> the HEADER file. I will create a new RC and restart the vote.
You may want to wait a little until other IPMC members reply, if other people
are fine with it and you fix it for the next release I'm happy to vote +1.
Hi Justin,
I will wait.
Thanks!
-Gon
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> HI,
>
> > I will add the DISCLAIMER, update the year in the NOTICE file, and delete
> > the HEADER file. I will create a new RC and restart the vote.
>
> You may want to wait a little until other IPMC
Does it help anything to look at this, again, as failure modes?
One failure mode is a project that emerges from the incubator showing,
well, gross signs that it 'doesn't get it.'
Another failure mode is that a group of people who really do get it, at the
level of the broad principles, get into tr
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> The release is missing DISCLAIMER file [1][2] While the web site does
> contain the incubating disclaimer and README mentions incubation it's
> missing the full text so that needs to be fixed for the next release and
> probably this one. What
Hi,
In that case +1 (binding) from me.
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> On Jan 10, 2015, at 7:14 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote:
>
> The Apache REEF PPMC has voted to release Apache REEF 0.10.0-incubating
> based on the release candidate described below. Now it is the IPMC's turn
> to vote.
>
> Here's the PPMC voting result (five binding +1 votes):
> http://mail-archiv
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I have an complementary suggestion to Marvin's push for documentation. My
> request is for a much clearer channel of communication to the board. All
> too often, projects wind up communicating with individuals; some board
> members, some n
Hi Alan,
Thank you for your comments.
I mistakenly copied and pasted digest values in my email. :(
My further comments are inlined.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
wrote:
>
> > On Jan 10, 2015, at 7:14 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote:
> >
> > The Apache REEF PPMC has voted to relea
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> More analogies; Just like "Western Culture"
I think a better analogy would be "US Culture". Yes it is as nebulous
as it gets, but the fact that US Constitution exists as a written document
makes a LOT of things WAY easier.
Thanks,
Roman.
14 matches
Mail list logo
