On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Luke Han wrote:
> ...I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Kylin as a new incubator
> project...
+1, binding
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 5:42 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since I'm new at being a mentor, I was wondering how to handle slow infra
> requests for podlings?
>
Hi John:
An occasional ping will help on the tickets.
Failing that, feel free to complain to me. And if I fail, you can talk
to Ri
Arvind
Thank you for offering to be a mentor. The proposal has been updated.
Arvind Prabhakar (StreamSets)
One of the comments we have received thus far is a potential concern of
whether multiple communities/projects can exist in similar problem areas.
Your background in Flume which solves sim
Hi,
one of the things I brought from ApacheCon is the idea if providing
dashboard for the podlings. Bitergia presented there their approach [1],
and I think could be useful. See for instance the dashboard they
provided for Apache CloudStack [2].
I already discussed it with Roman, and I think
+1 binding
On 18 November 2014 19:43, Josh Elser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Apache Slider project has voted to release 0.60.0-incubating. The team
> voted to release these artifacts with 6 +1's and nothing else. 2 of the 6
> votes were from IPMC members.
>
> Vote thread: http://s.apache.org/a6O
> Resu
Very interesting project!
I'm happy to help mentoring it.
On 20/11/14 03:02, Joe Witt wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose NiFi as an Apache Incubator Project.
In addition to the copy provided below the Wiki version of the
proposal can be found here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProp
+1 (binding)
On 20/11/14 23:31, Luke Han wrote:
Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201411.mbox/%3ccakmqrob22+n+r++date33f3pcpyujhfoeaqrms3t-udjwk6...@mail.gmail.com%3e
I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Kylin as a n
+1 (binding)
Looks good to me.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Apache Slider project has voted to release 0.60.0-incubating. The team
> voted to release these artifacts with 6 +1's and nothing else. 2 of the 6
> votes were from IPMC members.
>
> Vote thread: http
Sergio
Excellent - really appreciate it and look forward to working with you.
Have updated the proposal.
Sergio Fernandez (Redlink, Salzburg Research>
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal
Thanks
Joe
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Sergio Fernández <
sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearc
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
...
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal
Note that AFAICS some of the nominated mentors are not members of the
Incubator PMC [1] - they cannot be "formal" incubation mentors then.
ASF members can join that PMC just by asking.
ASF
Bertrand,
Understood. I had noticed other proposals listing these folks as mentors
but also providing their IPMC status along side. I'll do the same for now
and if they join the ipmc i'll update it and if they end up not doing so
will remove them. If that is not reasonable then just let me know
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
> ...I had noticed other proposals listing these folks as mentors
> but also providing their IPMC status along side. I'll do the same for now
> and if they join the ipmc i'll update it and if they end up not doing so
> will remove them. If th
I've advised Joe to 'asterix' the would-be mentors who are not iPMC yet, so
that he can proceed to a vote on the base of the ones who are sooner rather
than later, and the stragglers can be formally added to the metadata once
they are on the iPMC.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Sergio Fernández
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one of the things I brought from ApacheCon is the idea if providing
> dashboard for the podlings. Bitergia presented there their approach [1], and
> I think could be useful. See for instance the dashboard they provided for
> Apache
I agree with David.
For example, many projects are now mirrored to github, and github has
very good analytics:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pulse
https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/graphs/contributors
And, I don't have to log an INFRA JIRA to get them. Which makes both
m
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
Here is my [+1]
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
> positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
>
> Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
>
> Here is my [+1]
>
--
Sean
Great stuff, +1
On Thursday, November 20, 2014, Luke Han wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
>
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201411.mbox/%3ccakmqrob22+n+r++date33f3pcpyujhfoeaqrms3t-udjwk6...@mail.gmail.com%3e
>
> I would like to call a VOTE
Hey Benson
Can you please include the proposal with the vote, the wiki page can change
or be removed and the mailing list acts as the archive for the initial
proposal.
-Jake
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a c
+1, best wishes... based on revision #25[1]
--tim
[1] - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal?action=recall&rev=25
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
> positive conversation, so I offer thi
One down side to the github provided analytics is that projects may be
restricted in how they can make use of those analytics in e.g.
presentations. Github has previously asserted that those analytic outputs
are subject to a license grant from github and requested sign off in the
form of a user agr
+1 (binding). Good luck!
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattm
Hi All,
The Apache Aurora project has voted to release 0.6.0-incubating, our second
release. The team voted in favor of this release with 7 binding +1s, 1
non-binding +1. 3 of the binding +1 votes were from IPMC members.
Vote thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-aurora-dev
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 3:35 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> ...I am generally against us standing up our own service that does this.
> We've had a couple of these systems over the years. (pulse.a,o for
> instance). It takes a non-trivial amount of work to setup and maintain
> such a system, and in
This vote passes with 3 +1's. Billie's vote was cast on dev@slider.
Spoke with her directly and she said that she did forward the vote to
general@incubator but I haven't seen it (not sure if it's just me..)
Summary:
+1 Steve Loughran
+1 Billie Rinaldi
+1 John Ament
Thank you to those who took
On 21 November 2014 20:44, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 3:35 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> > ...I am generally against us standing up our own service that does this.
> > We've had a couple of these systems over the years. (pulse.a,o for
> > instance). It takes a non-t
We already evaluated the Bitergia offering - it is expensive and does not
provide sufficient benefit for the money (don't get me started on how metrics
are not a good evaluator of open source code...)
I fully agree with the comments below.
Ross
-Original Message-
From: jan i [mailto:j.
+1
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
> positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
>
> Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
>
> Here is my [+1]
>
--
http://hortonworks.com/download/
Note - I should say my comment below is in the context of a not-for-profit
software foundation using their services. People in different use cases should
look at their specific circumstances - obviously :-D
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:ross.gard...@m
+1 -C
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
> positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
>
> Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
>
> Here is my [+1]
+1 (binding)
On Fri Nov 21 2014 at 1:58:34 PM Benson Margulies
wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
> positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
>
> Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
>
> Here is my [+1]
>
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 6:35 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Sergio Fernández
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> one of the things I brought from ApacheCon is the idea if providing
>> dashboard for the podlings. Bitergia presented there their approach [1], and
>> I think could be us
Sergio, I think there's no need to ask for permission
in this particular case, unless you'd need to have
INFRA help you obtaining information that is not
publicly available.
But then again, knowing what this information is
would be useful anyway ;-)
So yeah... go ahead! I'd like to help as much
a
What, the whole text? OK.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> Hey Benson
> Can you please include the proposal with the vote, the wiki page can change
> or be removed and the mailing list acts as the archive for the initial
> proposal.
>
> -Jake
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:5
= NiFi Proposal =
== Abstract ==
Ni``Fi is a dataflow system based on the concepts of flow-based programming.
== Proposal ==
Ni``Fi supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing,
transformation, and system mediation logic. Some of the high-level
capabilities and objectives of Ni
+1
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:00 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri Nov 21 2014 at 1:58:34 PM Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful
> and
> > positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
> >
> > Vote will be open f
+1 (binding)
-Jake
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
> positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
>
> Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
>
> Here is my [+1]
>
>From what I understand, that Accumulo may or may not suffer from
"bifurcation" is debatable despite this blanket claim otherwise.
Regardless, Sean's point is valid, even if only a theoretical concern for
NiFi at this point. If the podling is interested in growing outside
community I'd be happy to
I would tend to disagree with your assertion about Accumulo, but this is
neither the time nor the place to discuss Accumulo's strengths and
weaknesses.
I'll make the assumption that request to enter incubation is a strong
intent to grow outside of the project's current home.
+1 (non-binding)
I didn't make an assertion *about* Accumulo, what I said exactly was:
"that Accumulo may or may not suffer from "bifurcation" is
debatable"
I assert there are two sides to that argument (I've heard them both),
merely to suggest that Sean's concerns should not be dismissed as they
were.
Thanks for the clarification -- that wasn't how it came across to me.
Andrew Purtell wrote:
I didn't make an assertion *about* Accumulo, what I said exactly was:
"that Accumulo may or may not suffer from "bifurcation" is
debatable"
I assert there are two sides to that argument (I've h
+1 (non-binding)
rb
On 11/21/2014 01:54 PM, Jake Farrell wrote:
+1 (binding)
-Jake
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
Vote will be open for the usua
Andrew - appreciate your comments and offer to assist as a mentor. Now
that the vote for incubation has kicked off i'm not sure what i'm allowed
to do or not. Will check will Benson.
For what it is worth I agree Sean raised a great point. I think it will be
an important part of our community bu
+1 ( binding)
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
> positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
>
> Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
>
> Here is my [+1]
>
--
Best regards,
- And
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
> positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> = NiFi Proposal =
>
> == Abstract ==
> Ni``Fi is a dataflow system based on the concepts of flow-based
> programming.
>
> == Proposal ==
> Ni``Fi supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of d
+1 - binding
On Nov 21, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
> positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
>
> Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
>
> Here is my [+1]
-
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 20, 2014, at 2:31 PM, Luke Han wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201411.mbox/%3ccakmqrob22+n+r++date33f3pcpyujhfoeaqrms3t-udjwk6...@mail.gmail.com%3e
>
> I would like to call
+1 (non-binding)
Great proposal!
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 16:22 Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> +1 - binding
>
> On Nov 21, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful
> and
> > positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
> >
Andrew - I've updated the proposal to reflect you as a mentor.
* Andrew Purtell (Salesforce) , IPMC Member
Thanks again
Joe
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Andrew - appreciate your comments and offer to assist as a mentor. Now
> that the vote for incubation has kicked of
50 matches
Mail list logo
