Hi,
Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
Ideally, your directory name should match the release version (0.5.0.rc2 vs
0.5.0)
John
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau wrote:
> It is my pleasure to present the Apach
Hi John,
Thanks for the feedback. I'd like to respond to each of your concerns:
>>Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
The notice file states: "Please see LICENSE for additional copyright and
licensing information." The LICENSE file contains the MIT license.
>>Your source file includes bi
During our first vote here on the Incubator General mailing lists, folks
pointed out a couple of problems in our release files.
There were some JavaScript components that we don't need in the source code
release and binary files (DLLs in the Dot-Net SDK) that we cannot ship. The
offending files an
+1 (binding)
Others have checked signatures and conducted functional tests (and noted
tiny discrepancies on the web-site build instructions). I have used this
software from the master branch quite recently. As such, I focussed on
non-functional aspects of the distro.
This looks like a very clea
On 7 September 2014 18:24, Dave wrote:
> During our first vote here on the Incubator General mailing lists, folks
> pointed out a couple of problems in our release files.
>
> There were some JavaScript components that we don't need in the source code
> release and binary files (DLLs in the Dot-Ne
+1 binding
Thanks for addressing things quickly and working through some of the pain
points :-)
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Dave wrote:
> During our first vote here on the Incubator General mailing lists, folks
> pointed out a couple of problems in our release files.
>
> There were some Ja
Sorry, I have to vote -1
The release is not staged in the proper place (e.g.
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ )
If this gets moved, I can vote +1
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for the feedback. I'd like to respond to each of your
As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put something
on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC approves
that release:
"Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the main
directories" [1]
For this candidate, as with our last two release
On 7 September 2014 21:31, Jacques Nadeau wrote:
> As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put something
> on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC
> approves
> that release:
>
> "Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the main
> di
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:39 PM, jan i wrote:
> On 7 September 2014 21:31, Jacques Nadeau wrote:
>
> > As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put
> something
> > on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC
> > approves
> > that release:
> >
> > "Only
On 7 September 2014 21:48, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:39 PM, jan i wrote:
>
> > On 7 September 2014 21:31, Jacques Nadeau wrote:
> >
> > > As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put
> > something
> > > on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by
Hey John,
Thanks for the vote and the information. I didn't even realize that the
dist.a.o/dev folder existed at until I read your reference at [1]. Always
new things to learn. I guess that is another option as opposed to the old
skool people.a.o.
[1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#ho
Hi!
it looks like September report is almost done,
except the following podlings:
* Streams
[ ](streams) Matt Franklin
[ ](streams) Ate Douma
[ ](streams) Craig McClanahan
* Falcon
[ ](falcon) Alan Gates
[ ](falcon) Chris Douglas
[ ](falcon) Devaraj Das
Hi Guys,
So I spent some time this weekend updating my scripts. They now fully
process missing ticks as well. Here is the list they generated of mentors
from January 2012 - August 2014 that did *not* sign off on a report (note
I'm at the top, bad mentor Chris). The results are a LOT better for wik
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Also, if there's anybody planning on creating
> a summary -- please let me know. Otherwise
> I'll do by the end of the day tomorrow.
If this month's Report Manager needs support, I'm happy to pitch in.
If we have to fall back to the PMC C
15 matches
Mail list logo